IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/col/000180/014109.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trayectorias y condiciones para la innovación en empresas de propiedad femenina: análisis comparativo de dos ciudades colombianas

Author

Listed:
  • Carolina Ortiz Riaga
  • Maria Eugenia Morales
  • Edison Fredy León Paime

Abstract

Resumen El objetivo de este artículo es realizar un análisis comparativo de las trayectorias y condiciones institucionales del entorno para desarrollar procesos de innovación en empresas de propiedad femenina en las ciudades de Bogotá y Bucaramanga (Colombia). La investigación parte de desarrollar la teoría de los campos como mecanismo de análisis para configurar una red conceptual que identifica a la mujer empresaria como un agente importante del campo empresarial, y a la innovación como un proceso estratégico en el que intervienen trayectorias y capitales específicos. Metodológicamente se hace un análisis discursivo de categorías inducidas en torno a las trayectorias y a los contextos institucionales, que emergen de un conjunto de 27 entrevistas semiestructuradas, que recopilan las experiencias de mujeres empresarias que han desarrollado procesos de innovación y que han sido reconocidas en diferentes ámbitos. Como resultado, el artículo identifica que, si bien existen diferencias en el entorno institucional de las dos ciudades, las empresarias a partir de sus trayectorias logran construir estrategias favorables para el desarrollo de prácticas que apuntan a la innovación. Aunque, el contexto institucional de la ciudad de Bucaramanga parece reportarse como más favorable para la innovación, las expresiones discursivas no permiten afirmar que Bogotá se presente como un contexto hostil.

Suggested Citation

  • Carolina Ortiz Riaga & Maria Eugenia Morales & Edison Fredy León Paime, 2014. "Trayectorias y condiciones para la innovación en empresas de propiedad femenina: análisis comparativo de dos ciudades colombianas," Revista Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Universidad Militar Nueva Granada, vol. 0(2), pages 154-184, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:col:000180:014109
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/rfce/v22n2/v22n2a10.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kurunmaki, Liisa, 1999. "Professional vs financial capital in the field of health care--struggles for the redistribution of power and control," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 95-124, April.
    2. Guan, Jian Cheng & Yam, Richard C.M. & Mok, Chiu Kam & Ma, Ning, 2006. "A study of the relationship between competitiveness and technological innovation capability based on DEA models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 170(3), pages 971-986, May.
    3. Yam, Richard C. M. & Guan, Jian Cheng & Pun, Kit Fai & Tang, Esther P. Y., 2004. "An audit of technological innovation capabilities in chinese firms: some empirical findings in Beijing, China," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(8), pages 1123-1140, October.
    4. David J. Teece & Gary Pisano & Amy Shuen, 1997. "Dynamic capabilities and strategic management," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(7), pages 509-533, August.
    5. Rey de Marulanda, Nohra & Tancredi, Francisco, 2010. "De la innovación social a la política pública: historias de éxito en América Latina y el Caribe," Documentos de Proyectos 39313, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    6. Hanlon, G., 1997. "Commercialising the service class and economic restructuring--a response to my critics," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 22(8), pages 843-855, November.
    7. Walsh, Eamonn J. & Jeacle, Ingrid, 2003. "The taming of the buyer: the retail inventory method and the early twentieth century department store," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(7-8), pages 773-791.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Selma Regina Martins Oliveira & Roberto Sbragia, 2015. "Modelling to assess the impact of technological innovation capacity in the performance of high complexity environments," International Journal of Business Performance and Supply Chain Modelling, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(1), pages 12-35.
    2. Selma Regina MARTINS OLIVEIRA, 2019. "Relationship Between Technological Eco-Innovation Capacity And Innovation Performance: Evidence From Most Innovative Firms In The Usa," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 13(1), pages 163-178, November.
    3. Kibaek Lee & Jaeheung Yoo & Munkee Choi & Hangjung Zo & Andrew P Ciganek, 2016. "Does External Knowledge Sourcing Enhance Market Performance? Evidence from the Korean Manufacturing Industry," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(12), pages 1-19, December.
    4. Serrano García, Jakeline & Acevedo Álvarez, Carlos Alberto & Castelblanco Gómez, Johnatan Mauricio & Arbeláez Toro, Juan José, 2017. "Measuring organizational capabilities for technological innovation through a fuzzy inference system," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 93-109.
    5. Xiaodong Yuan & Weiling Song, 2022. "Evaluating technology innovation capabilities of companies based on entropy- TOPSIS: the case of solar cell companies," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 65-76, June.
    6. Lucía Muñoz-Pascual & Jesús Galende, 2020. "Ambidextrous Knowledge and Learning Capability: The Magic Potion for Employee Creativity and Sustainable Innovation Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-27, May.
    7. Jose Arias-Pérez & Geovanny Perdomo-Charry & Carlos Castaño-Ríos, 2017. "Not-Invented-Here Syndrome And Innovation Performance: The Confounding Effect Of Innovation Capabilities As Organisational Routines In Service Firms," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(01), pages 1-20, January.
    8. Jalal Rajeh Hanaysha & Mohammed Emad Al-Shaikh & Shanmugan Joghee & Haitham M. Alzoubi, 2022. "Impact of Innovation Capabilities on Business Sustainability in Small and Medium Enterprises," FIIB Business Review, , vol. 11(1), pages 67-78, March.
    9. Zhang, Man & Hartley, Janet L., 2018. "Guanxi, IT systems, and innovation capability: The moderating role of proactiveness," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 75-86.
    10. Lau, Antonio K.W. & Lo, William, 2015. "Regional innovation system, absorptive capacity and innovation performance: An empirical study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 99-114.
    11. Broadstock, David C. & Matousek, Roman & Meyer, Martin & Tzeremes, Nickolaos G., 2020. "Does corporate social responsibility impact firms' innovation capacity? The indirect link between environmental & social governance implementation and innovation performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 99-110.
    12. Man Zhang & Patriya Tansuhaj & James McCullough, 2009. "International entrepreneurial capability: The measurement and a comparison between born global firms and traditional exporters in China," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 7(4), pages 292-322, December.
    13. Lu, Qicheng & Meng, Xiangju & Su, Jiaoyue & Au Kai Ming, Alan & Wu, Yongjie & Wang, Chengqi, 2023. "TMT functional background heterogeneity and SMEs’ performance: The role of dynamic capabilities and business environment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    14. Jakeline Serrano‐García & Andrea Bikfalvi & Josep Llach & Juan José Arbeláez‐Toro, 2022. "Capabilities and organisational dimensions conducive to green product innovation: Evidence from Croatian and Spanish manufacturing firms," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 2767-2785, November.
    15. Boly, Vincent & Morel, Laure & Assielou, N’Doli Guillaume & Camargo, Mauricio, 2014. "Evaluating innovative processes in french firms: Methodological proposition for firm innovation capacity evaluation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 608-622.
    16. Jalal Rajeh Hanaysha, 2021. "An Examination of Innovation Capabilities and Corporate Reputation in Banking Sector," Jindal Journal of Business Research, , vol. 10(2), pages 199-213, December.
    17. Dhir, Sanjay & Ongsakul, Viput & Ahmed, Zafar U. & Rajan, Rishabh, 2020. "Integration of knowledge and enhancing competitiveness: A case of acquisition of Zain by Bharti Airtel," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 674-684.
    18. Sang Ho Kook & Ki Hong Kim & Chulung Lee, 2017. "Dynamic Technological Diversification and Its Impact on Firms’ Performance: An Empirical Analysis of Korean IT Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-16, July.
    19. Magaly Gaviria-Marin & Jorge Matute-Vallejo & Hugo Baier-Fuentes, 2021. "The effect of ICT and higher-order capabilities on the performance of Ibero-American SMEs," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 414-450, December.
    20. Lucía Muñoz-Pascual & Jesús Galende, 2020. "Ambidextrous Relationships and Social Capability as Employee Well-Being: The Secret Sauce for Research and Development and Sustainable Innovation Performance," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-22, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Empresariado; Innovación; Mujer empresaria; Prácticas de gestión.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M10 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - General
    • O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:col:000180:014109. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Administrador (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/femngco.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.