IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/urbpla/v11y2026a10780.html

Experimenting With Gamification and Geogames in Urban Planning: A Systematic Literature Review

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Crilly

    (Architecture and Built Environment, Northumbria University, UK)

  • Georgiana Varna

    (School of Architecture, Planning & Landscape, Newcastle University, UK)

  • Alec Coaker

    (School of Architecture, Planning & Landscape, Newcastle University, UK)

  • Rhodri Cenek Gibbon

    (School of Architecture, Planning & Landscape, Newcastle University, UK)

  • Joshua Jackson

    (School of Architecture, Planning & Landscape, Newcastle University, UK)

  • Niamh Ellen McDonald

    (School of Architecture, Planning & Landscape, Newcastle University, UK)

  • Deegan Ramsey Smith

    (School of Architecture, Planning & Landscape, Newcastle University, UK)

Abstract

This systematic literature review examines the complex intersection of gamification and urban planning with particular attention to the interrelated fields of experimental urbanism, systems theory, digitalization of the urban planning system, game theory, and agent‐based modelling. As such, this article addresses the critical gap of an existing systematic and detailed literature review in this emerging area of using geogames in urban planning research and practice. The review synthesises both the available scholarship and related grey literature to understand how simulations and game‐based approaches are utilized in citizen engagement and urban planning policy. This article identifies the current priority themes in the application of gamification to urban planning through a temporal and thematic exploration of a mix of theoretical frameworks, empirical studies, practice‐based experiments, and software applications. This has been undertaken through a multi‐dimensional analysis of mixed academic and media databases. Moreover, it evaluates the effectiveness of urban simulations and game‐based planning interventions, highlighting the most promising areas for future applied research. The findings suggest that gamification and urban planning simulations represent a change in focus in planning theory and practice, offering new tools for participatory scenario‐based planning,urban analytics, and understanding or managing complex urban systems. The article concludes by highlighting current research gaps and proposing a dynamic future research agenda to advance the understanding and effective implementation of simulated approaches and geogames in urban design and planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Crilly & Georgiana Varna & Alec Coaker & Rhodri Cenek Gibbon & Joshua Jackson & Niamh Ellen McDonald & Deegan Ramsey Smith, 2026. "Experimenting With Gamification and Geogames in Urban Planning: A Systematic Literature Review," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v11:y:2026:a:10780
    DOI: 10.17645/up.10780
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/10780
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/up.10780?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Raphael Jolly & Alexandra Budke, 2023. "Assessing the Extent to Which Players Can Build Sustainable Cities in the Digital City-Builder Game “Cities: Skylines”," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-19, July.
    2. Philip Salesses & Katja Schechtner & César A Hidalgo, 2013. "The Collaborative Image of The City: Mapping the Inequality of Urban Perception," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(7), pages 1-12, July.
    3. C M Macal, 2016. "Everything you need to know about agent-based modelling and simulation," Journal of Simulation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(2), pages 144-156, May.
    4. David Webb, 2018. "Tactical Urbanism: Delineating a Critical Praxis," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(1), pages 58-73, January.
    5. Giuseppe Piras & Sofia Agostinelli & Francesco Muzi, 2024. "Digital Twin Framework for Built Environment: A Review of Key Enablers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-27, January.
    6. Nathan Fox & Victoria Campbell-Arvai & Mark Lindquist & Derek Van Berkel & Ramiro Serrano-Vergel, 2022. "Gamifying Decision Support Systems to Promote Inclusive and Engaged Urban Resilience Planning," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(2), pages 239-252.
    7. Waddell, Paul & Ulfarsson, Gudmundur F. & Franklin, Joel P. & Lobb, John, 2007. "Incorporating land use in metropolitan transportation planning," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 41(5), pages 382-410, June.
    8. Peter Johnson & Pamela Robinson, 2014. "Civic Hackathons: Innovation, Procurement, or Civic Engagement?," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 31(4), pages 349-357, July.
    9. Z. Aslıg�l G��men & Stephen J. Ventura, 2010. "Barriers to GIS Use in Planning," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 76(2), pages 172-183, April.
    10. Stephan Hügel & Anna R. Davies, 2022. "Playing for Keeps: Designing Serious Games for Climate Adaptation Planning Education With Young People," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(2), pages 306-320.
    11. James Delaney, 2022. "Minecraft and Playful Public Participation in Urban Design," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(2), pages 330-342.
    12. Stephan Hügel & Anna R. Davies, 2022. "Playing for Keeps: Designing Serious Games for Climate Adaptation Planning Education With Young People," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(2), pages 306-320.
    13. Andrew Karvonen & Bas Heur, 2014. "Urban Laboratories: Experiments in Reworking Cities," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(2), pages 379-392, March.
    14. Nathan Fox & Victoria Campbell-Arvai & Mark Lindquist & Derek Van Berkel & Ramiro Serrano-Vergel, 2022. "Gamifying Decision Support Systems to Promote Inclusive and Engaged Urban Resilience Planning," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(2), pages 239-252.
    15. Robert Goodspeed, 2015. "Smart cities: moving beyond urban cybernetics to tackle wicked problems," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 8(1), pages 79-92.
    16. James Delaney, 2022. "Minecraft and Playful Public Participation in Urban Design," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(2), pages 330-342.
    17. Oswald Devisch & Alenka Poplin & Simona Sofronie, 2016. "The Gamification of Civic Participation: Two Experiments in Improving the Skills of Citizens to Reflect Collectively on Spatial Issues," Journal of Urban Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(2), pages 81-102, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrew Hudson-Smith & Moozhan Shakeri, 2022. "The Future’s Not What It Used To Be: Urban Wormholes, Simulation, Participation, and Planning in the Metaverse," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(2), pages 214-217.
    2. Katinka Tóbiás & Lajos Boros, 2025. "Participatory Planning and Gamification: Insights from Hungary," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-25, March.
    3. Maria Teresa Carone & Loredana Antronico & Roberto Coscarelli, 2025. "Learning platforms for climate change adaptation: the importance of effective communication," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-10, December.
    4. Muhammad Ehtsham & Giuliana Parisi & Flavia Pedone & Federico Rossi & Marta Zincani & Eleonora Congiu & Chiara Marchionni, 2025. "AI-Powered Advanced Technologies for a Sustainable Built Environment: A Systematic Review on Emerging Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-45, September.
    5. Jinyi Li & Zhen Liu & Guizhong Han & Peter Demian & Mohamed Osmani, 2024. "The Relationship Between Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Building Information Modeling (BIM) Technologies for Sustainable Building in the Context of Smart Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-38, December.
    6. Cecilie Sachs Olsen & Merlijn van Hulst, 2024. "Reimagining Urban Living Labs: Enter the Urban Drama Lab," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(6), pages 991-1012, May.
    7. Ioanna Arkoudi & Carlos Lima Azevedo & Francisco C. Pereira, 2021. "Combining Discrete Choice Models and Neural Networks through Embeddings: Formulation, Interpretability and Performance," Papers 2109.12042, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2021.
    8. Sarah Williams & Elizabeth Currid-Halkett, 2014. "Industry in Motion: Using Smart Phones to Explore the Spatial Network of the Garment Industry in New York City," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(2), pages 1-11, February.
    9. Devon McAslan & Farah Najar Arevalo & David A. King & Thaddeus R. Miller, 2021. "Pilot project purgatory? Assessing automated vehicle pilot projects in U.S. cities," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-16, December.
    10. Andrei I. Vlad & Alexei A. Romanyukha & Tatiana E. Sannikova, 2024. "Parameter Tuning of Agent-Based Models: Metaheuristic Algorithms," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-21, July.
    11. Bernardine Chidozie & Ana Ramos & José Vasconcelos & Luis Pinto Ferreira & Reinaldo Gomes, 2024. "Highlighting Sustainability Criteria in Residual Biomass Supply Chains: A Dynamic Simulation Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-24, November.
    12. Matjaž Uršič & Tina Cotič, 2025. "The Limited Role of Socio-Ecological Indicators in Temporary Use of Space—Deficits in Revitalization of Degraded Urban Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-24, June.
    13. Anthony McLean & Harriet Bulkeley & Mike Crang, 2016. "Negotiating the urban smart grid: Socio-technical experimentation in the city of Austin," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(15), pages 3246-3263, November.
    14. Been, Vicki & Ellen, Ingrid Gould & Gedal, Michael & Glaeser, Edward & McCabe, Brian J., 2016. "Preserving history or restricting development? The heterogeneous effects of historic districts on local housing markets in New York City," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 16-30.
    15. Francesc Valls Dalmau & Pilar Garcia-Almirall & Ernest Redondo Domínguez & David Fonseca Escudero, 2014. "From Raw Data to Meaningful Information: A Representational Approach to Cadastral Databases in Relation to Urban Planning," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-28, October.
    16. Pijpers, Kevin, 2024. "Urban Living Labs in times of post-pandemic epistemic injustices: a speculative realist revision," SocArXiv rh6fc, Center for Open Science.
    17. Messa, Federico & Scarponi, Lily & Abdelfattah, Lamia & Carpentieri, Gerardo & Martinelli, Valerio & Stiuso, Tonia & Gorrini, Andrea, 2025. "Modeling women's perceived level of safety at night in Milan," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    18. Galdo, Virgilio & Li, Yue & Rama, Martin, 2021. "Identifying urban areas by combining human judgment and machine learning: An application to India," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    19. Anniken Førde, 2019. "Enhancing Urban Encounters: The Transformative Powers of Creative Integration Initiatives," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(1), pages 44-52.
    20. Ramon Marrades & Philippa Collin & Michelle Catanzaro & Eveline Mussi, 2021. "Planning from Failure: Transforming a Waterfront through Experimentation in a Placemaking Living Lab," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 221-234.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v11:y:2026:a:10780. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.