IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/rh6fc.html

Urban Living Labs in times of post-pandemic epistemic injustices: a speculative realist revision

Author

Listed:
  • Pijpers, Kevin

Abstract

The Urban Living Lab (ULL) is an aspirational device to materialize practices designed around co- production, participation, and transformation in the public arena. It is a research approach that emphasizes short-lived in-situ collaborations purified from the wider ex-situ political and social reality. This approach can strengthen epistemic trust injustices and harms by enforcing an overbearing mode of consensus-seeking participation around dominant epistemic regimes. This paper formulates an alternative, speculative realist approach to the ULL and analyses an ethnographic vignette to explore the intricacies, ambiguities, and disagreements within a post- pandemic ULL-situation in a community playground in Rotterdam South. Through these analyses, this paper takes inventory of matters of care in this stigmatized territory to show how an ULL might be done if it is to generate epistemic justice and social transformation.

Suggested Citation

  • Pijpers, Kevin, 2024. "Urban Living Labs in times of post-pandemic epistemic injustices: a speculative realist revision," SocArXiv rh6fc, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:rh6fc
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/rh6fc
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/6673eb570f8c801c273c9883/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/rh6fc?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrew Karvonen & Bas Heur, 2014. "Urban Laboratories: Experiments in Reworking Cities," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(2), pages 379-392, March.
    2. Sabrina Rahmawan‐Huizenga & Dara Ivanova, 2022. "THE URBAN LAB: Imaginative Work in the City," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(4), pages 542-557, July.
    3. Rianne Dekker & Juan Franco Contreras & Albert Meijer, 2020. "The Living Lab as a Methodology for Public Administration Research: a Systematic Literature Review of its Applications in the Social Sciences," International Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(14), pages 1207-1217, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:osf:socarx:rh6fc_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Cecilie Sachs Olsen & Merlijn van Hulst, 2024. "Reimagining Urban Living Labs: Enter the Urban Drama Lab," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(6), pages 991-1012, May.
    3. Kathryn Davidson & Lars Coenen & Michele Acuto & Brendan Gleeson, 2019. "Reconfiguring urban governance in an age of rising city networks: A research agenda," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(16), pages 3540-3555, December.
    4. Perng, Sung-Yueh & Kitchin, Rob & Donncha, Darach Mac, 2017. "Hackathons, entrepreneurship and the passionate making of smart cities," OSF Preprints nu3ec, Center for Open Science.
    5. Schiuma, Giovanni & Santarsiero, Francesco, 2023. "Innovation labs as organisational catalysts for innovation capacity development: A systematic literature review," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    6. Torill Nyseth & Torill Ringholm & Annika Agger, 2019. "Innovative Forms of Citizen Participation at the Fringe of the Formal Planning System," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(1), pages 7-18.
    7. Veronica Alejandra Neumann & Jochen Hack, 2019. "A Methodology of Policy Assessment at the Municipal Level: Costa Rica´s Readiness for the Implementation of Nature-Based-Solutions for Urban Stormwater Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-38, December.
    8. Anthony McLean & Harriet Bulkeley & Mike Crang, 2016. "Negotiating the urban smart grid: Socio-technical experimentation in the city of Austin," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(15), pages 3246-3263, November.
    9. Anniken Førde, 2019. "Enhancing Urban Encounters: The Transformative Powers of Creative Integration Initiatives," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(1), pages 44-52.
    10. Ramon Marrades & Philippa Collin & Michelle Catanzaro & Eveline Mussi, 2021. "Planning from Failure: Transforming a Waterfront through Experimentation in a Placemaking Living Lab," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 221-234.
    11. Marc Dijk & Joop De Kraker & Anique Hommels, 2018. "Anticipating Constraints on Upscaling from Urban Innovation Experiments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-16, August.
    12. Aksel Ersoy & Ellen van Bueren, 2020. "Challenges of Urban Living Labs towards the Future of Local Innovation," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(4), pages 89-100.
    13. Evans, Joshua & Collins, Damian & Anderson, Jalene, 2016. "Homelessness, bedspace and the case for Housing First in Canada," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 249-256.
    14. Frans Sengers & Bruno Turnheim & Frans Berkhout, 2021. "Beyond experiments: Embedding outcomes in climate governance," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 39(6), pages 1148-1171, September.
    15. Matthew Thompson & Vicky Nowak & Alan Southern & Jackie Davies & Peter Furmedge, 2020. "Re-grounding the city with Polanyi: From urban entrepreneurialism to entrepreneurial municipalism," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(6), pages 1171-1194, September.
    16. Siddharth Sareen, 2020. "Social and technical differentiation in smart meter rollout: embedded scalar biases in automating Norwegian and Portuguese energy infrastructure," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-8, December.
    17. Mike Hodson & James Evans & Gabriele Schliwa, 2018. "Conditioning experimentation: The struggle for place-based discretion in shaping urban infrastructures," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 36(8), pages 1480-1498, December.
    18. Ansell, Christopher K. & Bartenberger, Martin, 2016. "Varieties of experimentalism," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 64-73.
    19. Frans Sengers & Alexander Peine, 2021. "Innovation Pathways for Age-Friendly Homes in Europe," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-25, January.
    20. Anna Liddo & Grazia Concilio, 2017. "Making Decision in Open Communities: Collective Actions in the Public Realm," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 26(5), pages 847-856, September.
    21. Julie Gamble, 2017. "Experimental Infrastructure: Experiences in Bicycling in Quito, Ecuador," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(1), pages 162-180, January.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:rh6fc. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.