IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/poango/v7y2019i1p70-80.html

Constitutionalization and Entrepreneurship: Explaining Increased EU Steering of Renewables Support Schemes

Author

Listed:
  • Elin Lerum Boasson

    (Department of Political Science, University of Oslo, Norway / CICERO—Center for International Climate Research, Norway)

Abstract

This article sheds light on two under-researched issue areas: the energy policy-shaping role of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) and how constitutionalization of EU state aid law gives the European Commission (Commission) increased leverage over EU policy development. EU state aid governance is embedded in the Treaty of the Functioning of the EU’s prohibition of state aid. The CJEU and the Commissions’ Directorate-General for Competition (DG Comp) have played important roles in the emergence of stronger EU steering of renewable energy support schemes after 2014. For many years, powerful member states, most notably Germany, stopped the adoption of EU rules requiring more market streamlining and European harmonization of renewables support. This primarily played out in regular EU decision-making (co-decision) related to adoption and revision of the Renewable Energy Directive. A radical shift occurred in 2014 when the Commission introduced new guidelines on state aid for environmental protection and energy, giving the Commission increased authority over development of renewables support schemes across Europe. These guidelines called for renewables investments to become more exposed to energy market pricing and introduced auctioning as the main allocation mechanism. Support schemes for renewable energy were included for the first time in the EU state aid guidelines for environmental protection in 2001. Back then, member states had ample leeway to design support schemes as they pleased. The 2014 version of the guidelines includes far more detailed requirements. While the first CJEU ruling on renewables state aid hindered the Commission to intervene, new CJEU rulings after 2008 enabled the Commission to draft more restrictive guidelines. This article concludes that constitutionalization, combined with the policy entrepreneurship of Commission officials, explains the shift in EU steering in 2014. This indicates that constitutionalization and Commission entrepreneurship should be assessed in conjunction. Constitutionalization may be particularly important in the state aid area due to the superior competence of the Commission.

Suggested Citation

  • Elin Lerum Boasson, 2019. "Constitutionalization and Entrepreneurship: Explaining Increased EU Steering of Renewables Support Schemes," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(1), pages 70-80.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v7:y:2019:i:1:p:70-80
    DOI: 10.17645/pag.v7i1.1851
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/1851
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/pag.v7i1.1851?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mitchell P. Smith, 1998. "Autonomy by the Rules: The European Commission and the Development of State Aid Policy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(1), pages 55-78, March.
    2. Newbery, David & Pollitt, Michael G. & Ritz, Robert A. & Strielkowski, Wadim, 2018. "Market design for a high-renewables European electricity system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 695-707.
    3. Andrew Moravcsik, 1993. "Preferences and Power in the European Community: A Liberal Intergovernmentalist Approach," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 473-524, December.
    4. Hussein Kassim & Bruce Lyons, 2013. "The New Political Economy of EU State Aid Policy," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, March.
    5. Jacobsson, Staffan & Lauber, Volkmar, 2006. "The politics and policy of energy system transformation--explaining the German diffusion of renewable energy technology," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 256-276, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elin Lerum Boasson, 2019. "Constitutionalization and Entrepreneurship: Explaining Increased EU Steering of Renewables Support Schemes," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(1), pages 70-80.
    2. Nikolaos Zahariadis, 2013. "Winners and Losers in EU State Aid Policy," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 143-158, March.
    3. Bernard Steunenberg & Pieter Zwaan, 2024. "Working with the EU: How Discourses Shape the Application of EU State Aid Rules," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(1), pages 242-261, January.
    4. Marcel Bednarz & Tom Broekel, 2020. "Pulled or pushed? The spatial diffusion of wind energy between local demand and supply," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 29(4), pages 893-916.
    5. Koecklin, Manuel Tong & Longoria, Genaro & Fitiwi, Desta Z. & DeCarolis, Joseph F. & Curtis, John, 2021. "Public acceptance of renewable electricity generation and transmission network developments: Insights from Ireland," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    6. Chaves, J. P. & Cossent, R. & Gómez San Román, T. & Linares, P. & Rivier, M., 2023. "An assessment of the European electricity market reform options and a pragmatic proposal," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 2325, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    7. Wilson, Charlie, 2012. "Up-scaling, formative phases, and learning in the historical diffusion of energy technologies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 81-94.
    8. Kyriakopoulos, Grigorios L. & Arabatzis, Garyfallos & Tsialis, Panagiotis & Ioannou, Konstantinos, 2018. "Electricity consumption and RES plants in Greece: Typologies of regional units," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 134-144.
    9. Steffen S. Bettin, 2020. "Electricity infrastructure and innovation in the next phase of energy transition—amendments to the technology innovation system framework," Review of Evolutionary Political Economy, Springer, vol. 1(3), pages 371-395, November.
    10. Ma. Janice J. Gumasing & Alyssa Bayola & Sebastian Luis Bugayong & Keithzi Rhaz Cantona, 2023. "Determining the Factors Affecting Filipinos’ Acceptance of the Use of Renewable Energies: A Pro-Environmental Planned Behavior Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-21, May.
    11. Danielle Devogelaer & Benoît Laine, 2016. "Working Paper 09-16 - Drivers of wholesale electricity prices in a small, open economy - Some evidence from the nuclear restart in Belgium [Working Paper 09-16 - Marché de l’électricité : facteurs ," Working Papers 1609, Federal Planning Bureau, Belgium.
    12. Zhang, Ying & Zahoor, Zahid, 2025. "The role of energy subsidies, savings, and transitions in driving energy transformations toward net-zero emissions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 320(C).
    13. Keppler, Jan Horst & Quemin, Simon & Saguan, Marcelo, 2022. "Why the sustainable provision of low-carbon electricity needs hybrid markets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    14. Ibrahim Abada & Andreas Ehrenmann, 2026. "When Market Incompleteness Is Preferable to Market Power: Insights from Power Markets," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 74(2), pages 573-595, March.
    15. Gitelman, Lazar & Kozhevnikov, Mikhail & Ditenberg, Maksim, 2024. "Electrification as a factor in replacing hydrocarbon fuel," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    16. Morales-España, Germán & Nycander, Elis & Sijm, Jos, 2021. "Reducing CO2 emissions by curtailing renewables: Examples from optimal power system operation," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    17. Yang, Ju-Ying, 2025. "Pathways to a sustainable energy future: A comparative case study of four Texas municipalities," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    18. Herrmann, J.K. & Savin, I., 2017. "Optimal policy identification: Insights from the German electricity market," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 71-90.
    19. Guangzeng Sun & Bo Yuan & Han Zhang & Peng Xia & Cong Wu & Yichun Gong, 2025. "Game-Optimization Modeling of Shadow Carbon Pricing and Low-Carbon Transition in the Power Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-15, August.
    20. repec:bla:jcmkts:v:47:y:2009:i::p:483-506 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Zbigniew Juroszek & Weronika Juroszek, 2018. "Attitudes of heat plant managers as one of the key obstacles to district heating decarbonization in Poland," Energy & Environment, , vol. 29(7), pages 1116-1129, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v7:y:2019:i:1:p:70-80. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.