IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/poango/v11y2023i3p189-199.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Janus Face of Valuation: Global Performance Indicators as Powerful and Criticized Public Measures

Author

Listed:
  • Leopold Ringel

    (Department of Sociology, Bielefeld University, Germany)

Abstract

The article conceptualizes global performance indicators as public measures that are powerful but also receive a wide range of criticism. Global performance indicators derive their power from combining three analytically distinct elements: (a) commensuration (comparing performances on a common metric), (b) visual simplification (presenting performances in an appealing format), and (c) serialization (framing performance as a continuous developing property). However, the very same elements are often subject to criticism. The producers of global performance indicators, therefore, defend methodologies and the validity of commensurated numbers, meet charges of visual oversimplification by professing sobriety and nuance, and balance temporal continuity and discontinuity. By conceptualizing global performance indicators as powerful and criticized public measures, the article draws attention to the Janus face of valuation, which the producers must tackle continuously. Investing considerable time, energy, and resources, these organizations are a key feature of today’s vast indicator culture.

Suggested Citation

  • Leopold Ringel, 2023. "The Janus Face of Valuation: Global Performance Indicators as Powerful and Criticized Public Measures," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(3), pages 189-199.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v:11:y:2023:i:3:p:189-199
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/6780
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Judith G. Kelley & Beth A. Simmons, 2015. "Politics by Number: Indicators as Social Pressure in International Relations," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 59(1), pages 55-70, January.
    2. Staffan Andersson & Paul M. Heywood, 2009. "The Politics of Perception: Use and Abuse of Transparency International's Approach to Measuring Corruption," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 57, pages 746-767, December.
    3. Staffan Andersson & Paul M. Heywood, 2009. "The Politics of Perception: Use and Abuse of Transparency International's Approach to Measuring Corruption," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 57(4), pages 746-767, December.
    4. Anne Bowers & Matteo Prato, 2019. "The Role of Third-Party Rankings in Status Dynamics: How Does the Stability of Rankings Induce Status Changes?," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(6), pages 1146-1164, November.
    5. Kelley, Judith G. & Simmons, Beth A., 2019. "Introduction: The Power of Global Performance Indicators," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 73(3), pages 491-510, July.
    6. Ronzani, Matteo & Gatzweiler, Marian Konstantin, 2022. "The lure of the visual: Multimodality, simplification, and performance measurement visualizations in a megaproject," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Janne Mende & Thomas Müller, 2023. "Publics in Global Politics: A Framing Paper," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(3), pages 91-97.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michener, Gregory, 2015. "Policy Evaluation via Composite Indexes: Qualitative Lessons from International Transparency Policy Indexes," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 184-196.
    2. Indra Overland & Anatoli Bourmistrov & Brigt Dale & Stephanie Irlbacher‐Fox & Javlon Juraev & Eduard Podgaiskii & Florian Stammler & Stella Tsani & Roman Vakulchuk & Emma C. Wilson, 2021. "The Arctic Environmental Responsibility Index: A method to rank heterogenous extractive industry companies for governance purposes," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 1623-1643, May.
    3. Hu, Juncheng, 2021. "Do facilitation payments affect earnings management? Evidence from China," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    4. David Arellano Gault, 2017. "Corruption as an organizational process: Understanding the logic of the denormalization of corruption," Contaduría y Administración, Accounting and Management, vol. 62(3), pages 827-842, Julio-Sep.
    5. Eugen Dimant & Guglielmo Tosato, 2018. "Causes And Effects Of Corruption: What Has Past Decade'S Empirical Research Taught Us? A Survey," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(2), pages 335-356, April.
    6. Guillermo Perry & Víctor Saavedra & Fernando Cepeda & Andrés Hernández & Mónica Pachón & Elizabeth Ungar & María Margarita Zuleta & Juan Camilo Medellín, 2018. "Lucha integral contra la corrupción en Colombia: reflexiones y propuestas," Libros Fedesarrollo 16610, Fedesarrollo.
    7. Dr. Ambrues Monboe Nebo, 2023. "Can Liberia Replicatethe Singapore Experience inCurbing Entrenched and Systemic Corruption? A Comparative Analysis," International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 10(06), pages 30-40, June.
    8. Dávid-Barrett, Elizabeth & Fazekas, Mihály, 2020. "Anti-corruption in aid-funded procurement: Is corruption reduced or merely displaced?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    9. Chapkovski, Philipp, 2022. "Unintended consequences of corruption indices: an experimental approach," MPRA Paper 112598, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Mihaly Fazekas & Istvan Janos Toth & Lawrence Peter King, 2014. "Anatomy of grand corruption: A composite corruption risk index based on objective data," CERS-IE WORKING PAPERS 1403, Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies.
    11. Gutmann, Jerg & Padovano, Fabio & Voigt, Stefan, 2020. "Perception vs. experience: Explaining differences in corruption measures using microdata," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    12. Alice N. Sindzingre & Christian Milelli, 2010. "The Uncertain Relationship between Corruption and Growth in Developing Countries: Threshold Effects and State Effectiveness," EconomiX Working Papers 2010-10, University of Paris Nanterre, EconomiX.
    13. Ivlevs Artjoms & Hinks Timothy, 2015. "Bribing Behaviour and Sample Selection: Evidence from Post-Socialist Countries and Western Europe," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 235(2), pages 139-167, April.
    14. Carmelo León & Jorge Araña & Javier León, 2013. "Correcting for Scale Perception Bias in Measuring Corruption: an Application to Chile and Spain," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 114(3), pages 977-995, December.
    15. Buchenau Klaus & Lecić Miloš & Matković Damjan & Olaru Vasile Mihai & Frey Barbara & Jović Jovana, 2022. "Vitamin Sea against Corruption: Informality and Corruption through the Interdisciplinary Lens: The Regensburg Corruption Cluster. A Workshop on the Island of Cres, Croatia, 23–30 September 2021," Comparative Southeast European Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 70(2), pages 358-378, June.
    16. Faradj Koliev & Thomas Sommerer & Jonas Tallberg, 2021. "Compliance without coercion: Effects of reporting on international labor rights," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 58(3), pages 494-509, May.
    17. Marek Litzman & Luděk Kouba, 2015. "How the Legal Environment Affects the Structure of Employment," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 63(6), pages 2005-2009.
    18. Agu Sylvia U, 2016. "Instrumentalities for the Effectiveness of Measures of Public Accountability in Africa," SAGE Open, , vol. 6(2), pages 21582440156, April.
    19. Pieroni, Luca & d'Agostino, Giorgio & Bartolucci, Francesco, 2013. "Identifying corruption through latent class models: evidence from transition economies," MPRA Paper 43981, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. José-Miguel Bello y Villarino, 2021. "Measuring Corruption: A Critical Analysis of the Existing Datasets and Their Suitability for Diachronic Transnational Research," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 157(2), pages 709-747, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v:11:y:2023:i:3:p:189-199. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.