IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/meanco/v10y2022i1p54-65.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Relational Approach to How Media Engage With Their Audiences in Social Media

Author

Listed:
  • Mark Badham

    (Corporate Communication, Jyväskylä University School of Business & Economics, Finland)

  • Markus Mykkänen

    (Department of Language and Communication Studies, University of Jyväskylä, Finland)

Abstract

People are increasingly turning to social media for their news and for sharing and discussing news with others. Simultaneously, media organizations are becoming platform-dependent and posting short forms of their news on their social media sites in the hope that audiences will not only consume this news but also comment on and share it. This article joins other media and journalism studies exploring this phenomenon through a relational approach to media audiences to better understand how media organizations, particularly newspapers, are cultivating relationships with audiences via social media. Drawing on public relations theory about organization–public relationships, the article examines how news organizations nurture relationships with audiences via social media, such as through engagement and dialogic communication strategies. This article empirically examines organization–public relationships strategies (disclosure, access, information dissemination, and engagement) of nine newspapers with the largest reach in Australia, the US, and the UK. A content analysis is conducted of these newspapers’ posts (total 1807) published in March 2021 on their Twitter and Facebook sites to identify and examine these strategies. Findings show that their social media accounts are predominantly used for news dissemination rather than audience engagement. The implications are that although media professionals are frequently distributing news content among their audiences via their social media sites, they are not adequately engaging with them.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark Badham & Markus Mykkänen, 2022. "A Relational Approach to How Media Engage With Their Audiences in Social Media," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(1), pages 54-65.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v10:y:2022:i:1:p:54-65
    DOI: 10.17645/mac.v10i1.4409
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/4409
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/mac.v10i1.4409?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Deephouse & Pursey Heugens, 2009. "Linking Social Issues to Organizational Impact: The Role of Infomediaries and the Infomediary Process," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 86(4), pages 541-553, June.
    2. Seth C. Lewis & Logan Molyneux, 2018. "A Decade of Research on Social Media and Journalism: Assumptions, Blind Spots, and a Way Forward," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(4), pages 11-23.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mark Badham & Markus Mykkänen, 2022. "A Relational Approach to How Media Engage With Their Audiences in Social Media," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(1), pages 54-65.
    2. Peter M. Madsen & Zachariah J. Rodgers, 2015. "Looking good by doing good: The antecedents and consequences of stakeholder attention to corporate disaster relief," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(5), pages 776-794, May.
    3. Srikant, Chethan D., 2019. "Impression management strategies to gain regulatory approval," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 136-153.
    4. Nikki Usher & Matt Carlson, 2018. "The Midlife Crisis of the Network Society," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(4), pages 107-110.
    5. Elanor Colleoni & Nuccio Ludovico & Illia Laura & Ravindran Kiron, 2021. "Does Sharing Economy Have a Moral Capital? Comparing Semantic Networks in Social Media and News Media," Journal of Management and Sustainability, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(2), pages 1-1, December.
    6. James E. Katz, 2018. "Commentary on News and Participation through and beyond Proprietary Platforms in an Age of Social Media," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(4), pages 103-106.
    7. Neta Kligler-Vilenchik, 2018. "Why We Should Keep Studying Good (and Everyday) Participation: An Analogy to Political Participation," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(4), pages 111-114.
    8. Florian Scheiber, 2015. "Dressing up for Diffusion: Codes of Conduct in the German Textile and Apparel Industry, 1997–2010," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 126(4), pages 559-580, February.
    9. Neta Kligler-Vilenchik, 2018. "Why We Should Keep Studying Good (and Everyday) Participation: An Analogy to Political Participation," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(4), pages 111-114.
    10. Tatiana Santos Gonçalves & Pedro Jerónimo & João Carlos Correia, 2021. "Local News and Geolocation Technology in the Case of Portugal," Publications, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-13, November.
    11. Alderete, María Verónica, 2019. "Examining the drivers of internet use among the poor: The case of Bahía Blanca city in Argentina," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    12. Jo-Ellen Pozner & Aharon Mohliver & Celia Moore, 2019. "Shine a Light: How Firm Responses to Announcing Earnings Restatements Changed After Sarbanes–Oxley," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 160(2), pages 427-443, December.
    13. Sherwin Chua & Oscar Westlund, 2019. "Audience-Centric Engagement, Collaboration Culture and Platform Counterbalancing: A Longitudinal Study of Ongoing Sensemaking of Emerging Technologies," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(1), pages 153-165.
    14. Dejan N. Zec, 2024. "Media framing of sustainability: The case of British pharmaceutical companies (2000–2020)," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(4), pages 4001-4019, August.
    15. Ivar John Erdal & Kjetil Vaage Øie & Brett Oppegaard & Oscar Westlund, 2019. "Invisible Locative Media: Key Considerations at the Nexus of Place and Digital Journalism," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(1), pages 166-178.
    16. Miguel Rivera-Santos & Carlos Rufín, 2010. "Odd Couples: Understanding the Governance of Firm–NGO Alliances," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 94(1), pages 55-70, July.
    17. Zhou, Ziyuan & Zhang, Xueying & Ki, Eyun-Jung, 2025. "When the accuser meets the accused: Exploring the role of nonprofit legitimacy and CSR reputation in corporate social irresponsibility," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    18. Zhe Ouyang & Xiaojiao Wang & Yang Liu, 2024. "The use of corporate social responsibility in response to product‐harm crisis: How do stock market reactions matter?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(4), pages 3081-3097, July.
    19. Sun Lee & Craig Carroll, 2011. "The Emergence, Variation, and Evolution of Corporate Social Responsibility in the Public Sphere, 1980–2004: The Exposure of Firms to Public Debate," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 104(1), pages 115-131, November.
    20. Michael Hadani, 2024. "The Impact of Trustworthiness on the Association of Corporate Social Responsibility and Irresponsibility on Legitimacy," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(4), pages 1266-1294, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v10:y:2022:i:1:p:54-65. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.