IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cmj/networ/y2018i12p131-140.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What Takes Consumers To Develop Brand Advocacy On Facebook

Author

Listed:
  • Ana Raluca CHIOSA

    (Alexandru Ioan Cuza University)

  • Bogdan ANASTASIEI

    (Alexandru Ioan Cuza University)

Abstract

The role that social media is playing nowadays makes users' spreading electronic word-of-mouth much more easier. The present research aimed to determine the influence of brand attitude on brand advocacy. Previous research has shown that product performance, altruism (concern for helping others) and need for socila interactions are major antecedents of eWOM communication. A self-administrated questionnaire with a visual stimulus was used to collect data from 108 Romanian Facebook users. The results indicate that brand trust and brand tribalism are important antecedents of brand attitude. Online brand advocacy depends on the trust the consumers have on that brand and the status of members of their brand tribe, thus the ambassadors would promote the brand from their own initiative. Believing that a certain brand can help consumers improve their status in the community or society is a powerful factor that motivates online users to become brand advocates.

Suggested Citation

  • Ana Raluca CHIOSA & Bogdan ANASTASIEI, 2018. "What Takes Consumers To Develop Brand Advocacy On Facebook," Network Intelligence Studies, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 12, pages 131-140, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:cmj:networ:y:2018:i:12:p:131-140
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://seaopenresearch.eu/Journals/articles/NIS_12_7.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. King, Robert Allen & Racherla, Pradeep & Bush, Victoria D., 2014. "What We Know and Don't Know About Online Word-of-Mouth: A Review and Synthesis of the Literature," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 167-183.
    2. Veloutsou, Cleopatra & Moutinho, Luiz, 2009. "Brand relationships through brand reputation and brand tribalism," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(3), pages 314-322, March.
    3. Yubo Chen & Jinhong Xie, 2008. "Online Consumer Review: Word-of-Mouth as a New Element of Marketing Communication Mix," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(3), pages 477-491, March.
    4. Jonah Berger & Raghuram Iyengar, 2013. "Communication Channels and Word of Mouth: How the Medium Shapes the Message," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 40(3), pages 567-579.
    5. Eastlick, Mary Ann & Lotz, Sherry L. & Warrington, Patricia, 2006. "Understanding online B-to-C relationships: An integrated model of privacy concerns, trust, and commitment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(8), pages 877-886, August.
    6. Shirley Taylor & Peter A. Todd, 1995. "Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 6(2), pages 144-176, June.
    7. Morgan-Thomas, Anna & Veloutsou, Cleopatra, 2013. "Beyond technology acceptance: Brand relationships and online brand experience," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 21-27.
    8. Bernard Cova & Veronique Cova, 2002. "Tribal marketing: The tribalisation of society and its impact on the conduct of marketing," Post-Print hal-01822665, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Boisvert, Jean & Christodoulides, George & Sajid Khan, M., 2023. "Toward a better understanding of key determinants and consequences of masstige consumption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    2. M. Narciso, 2022. "The Unreliability of Online Review Mechanisms," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 45(3), pages 349-368, September.
    3. Valentina Daniela N. CONSTANTIN & Roxana-Denisa G. STOENESCU, 2014. "The Impact Of Origin On Creating A Cult Brand: The Case Of Apple," SEA - Practical Application of Science, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 3, pages 123-134, April.
    4. Morgan-Thomas, Anna & Veloutsou, Cleopatra, 2013. "Beyond technology acceptance: Brand relationships and online brand experience," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 21-27.
    5. Hemant C. Sashittal & Avan R. Jassawalla, 2020. "The personal influence of Instagram bloggers on consumer–brand interactions: brands as tribal artifacts," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(6), pages 679-690, November.
    6. Dongxiao Gu & Xuejie Yang & Xingguo Li & Hemant K. Jain & Changyong Liang, 2018. "Understanding the Role of Mobile Internet-Based Health Services on Patient Satisfaction and Word-of-Mouth," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-23, September.
    7. Eelen, Jiska & Özturan, Peren & Verlegh, Peeter W.J., 2017. "The differential impact of brand loyalty on traditional and online word of mouth: The moderating roles of self-brand connection and the desire to help the brand," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 872-891.
    8. Sun, Xiaochi & Foscht, Thomas & Eisingerich, Andreas B., 2021. "Does educating customers create positive word of mouth?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    9. Margurite Hook & Stacey Baxter & Alicia Kulczynski, 2018. "Antecedents and consequences of participation in brand communities: a literature review," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 25(4), pages 277-292, July.
    10. Chapman, Alexis & Dilmperi, Athina, 2022. "Luxury brand value co-creation with online brand communities in the service encounter," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 902-921.
    11. Thomas Friedrich & Sebastian Schlauderer & Sven Overhage, 2021. "Some things are just better rich: how social commerce feature richness affects consumers’ buying intention via social factors," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(1), pages 159-180, March.
    12. Baudier, Patricia & Ammi, Chantal & Hikkerova, Lubica, 2022. "Impact of advertising on users’ perceptions regarding the Internet of things," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 355-366.
    13. Linda Seduram & Abdullah Al Mamun & Anas A. Salameh & Selvan Perumal & Hasnizam Shaari, 2022. "Predicting Smartphone Brand Loyalty Using Four-Stage Loyalty Model," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, May.
    14. Hernández-Ortega, Blanca, 2020. "When the performance comes into play: The influence of positive online consumer reviews on individuals' post-consumption responses," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 422-435.
    15. MinJae Lee & JinKyu Lee, 2012. "The impact of information security failure on customer behaviors: A study on a large-scale hacking incident on the internet," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 375-393, April.
    16. Lingli Luo & Xufei Ma & Zeyu Wang, 2022. "The moderate-reputation trap: Evidence from a Chinese cross-border business-to-business e-commerce portal," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 39(2), pages 395-432, June.
    17. Andreini, Daniela & Pedeliento, Giuseppe & Zarantonello, Lia & Solerio, Chiara, 2019. "Reprint of "A renaissance of brand experience: Advancing the concept through a multi-perspective analysis"," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 355-365.
    18. Nepomuceno, Marcelo Vinhal & Laroche, Michel & Richard, Marie-Odile, 2014. "How to reduce perceived risk when buying online: The interactions between intangibility, product knowledge, brand familiarity, privacy and security concerns," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 619-629.
    19. Joaquin Sanchez & Carmen Abril & Michael Haenlein, 2020. "Competitive spillover elasticities of electronic word of mouth: an application to the soft drink industry," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(2), pages 270-287, March.
    20. Subhajit Bhattacharya & Vijeta Anand, 2021. "What Makes the Indian Youths to Engage with Online Retail Brands: An Empirical Study," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 22(6), pages 1507-1529, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cmj:networ:y:2018:i:12:p:131-140. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Serghie Dan (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://seaopenresearch.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.