IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/clr/wugarc/y1986v12i4p507.html

Betriebsgröße als Determinante beruflicher Gratifikationen

Author

Listed:
  • Josef Brüderl
  • Peter Preisendörfer

Abstract

Das Fazit der Analysen läßt sich in drei Punkten kondensieren: 1. Vor dem Hintergrund der Schlüsselrolle, die der Betriebsgröße in der Literatur über organisationale Determinanten beruflicher Gratifikationen zugemessen wird, fallen die betriebsgrößenbezogenen Unterschiede, die hier auf der Basis eines bundesdeutschen Datensatzes festgestellt werden konnten, überraschend niedrig aus. 2. Entgegen einem weitverbreiteten Eindruck in der Literatur läßt sich eine Beschäftigung in Großbetrieben nicht uneingeschränkt als für Arbeitnehmer vorteilhaft einstufen. Als Beleg hierfür kann man auf den Befund rekurrieren, daß Arbeitszufriedenheit tendenziell negativ mit der Betriebsgröße korreliert. 3. Während sich für Männer - abgesehen von der Arbeitszufriedenheit - eine Beschäftigung in Großbetrieben als der Tendenz nach positiv erweist, erscheint bei Frauen eine Differenzierung notwendig: Sie profitieren zwar in punkto Einkommen von einer Beschäftigung in Großbetrieben, üben dabei allerdings Tätigkeiten mit einem geringeren beruflichen Prestige aus (Arbeitertätigkeiten). Zudem wird ein Mehr an Bildung und Berufserfahrung bei Frauen in Großbetrieben weniger honoriert als bei Frauen in Kleinbetrieben.

Suggested Citation

  • Josef Brüderl & Peter Preisendörfer, 1986. "Betriebsgröße als Determinante beruflicher Gratifikationen," Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft - WuG, Kammer für Arbeiter und Angestellte für Wien, Abteilung Wirtschaftswissenschaft und Statistik, vol. 12(4), pages 507-523.
  • Handle: RePEc:clr:wugarc:y:1986v:12i:4p:507
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://emedien.arbeiterkammer.at/viewer/pdf/AC08890876_1986_004/wug_1986_12_4_0507.pdf
    File Function: PDF-file of article
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert S. Smith, 1979. "Compensating Wage Differentials and Public Policy: A Review," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 32(3), pages 339-352, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Morley Gunderson & Douglas Hyatt, 1996. "Do Injured Workers Pay for Reasonable Accommodation?," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 50(1), pages 92-104, October.
    2. Hamilton,Kirk E. & Helliwell,John F. & Woolcock,Michael, 2016. "Social capital, trust, and well-being in the evaluation of wealth," Policy Research Working Paper Series 7707, The World Bank.
    3. Russell, Helen & Maitre, Bertrand & Watson, Dorothy, 2015. "Trends and Patterns in Occupational Health and Safety in Ireland," Research Series, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), number RS40.
    4. Benkhalifa, Abdelaziz, 2014. "Rôle du syndicat dans la détermination de la valeur de la vie statistique en Tunisie [Trade union role in determining the value of a statistical life in Tunisia]," MPRA Paper 63736, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Scotton Carol R., 2013. "New risk rates, inter-industry differentials and the magnitude of VSL estimates," Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, De Gruyter, vol. 4(1), pages 39-80, March.
    6. Meng, Ronald, 1991. "Compensating wages for long-term job hazards in Canadian industry," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 331-336, July.
    7. repec:eee:labchp:v:1:y:1986:i:c:p:387-423 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Climent Quintana-Domeque, 2008. "Preferences, Comparative Advantage, and Compensating Wage Differentials for Job Routinization," Working Papers 1063, Princeton University, Department of Economics, Industrial Relations Section..
    9. George R. Boyer & Robert S. Smith, 2001. "The Development of the Neoclassical Tradition in Labor Economics," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 54(2), pages 199-223, January.
    10. Helge Arends, 2017. "Equal Living Conditions vs. Cultural Sovereignty? Federalism Reform, Educational Poverty and Spatial Inequalities in Germany," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 47(4), pages 673-706.
    11. William T. Dickens & Brian A. Ross, 1984. "Consistent Estimation Using Data From More Than One Sample," NBER Technical Working Papers 0033, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    12. Pia M. Orrenius & Madeline Zavodny, 2013. "Immigrants in risky occupations," Chapters, in: Amelie F. Constant & Klaus F. Zimmermann (ed.), International Handbook on the Economics of Migration, chapter 11, pages 214-226, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    13. Noria, Gabriela López, 2015. "The effect of trade and FDI on inter-industry wage differentials: The case of Mexico," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 381-397.
    14. Christiane Bode & Jasjit Singh, 2018. "Taking a hit to save the world? Employee participation in a corporate social initiative," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(4), pages 1003-1030, April.
    15. Hamermesh, Daniel S & Wolfe, John R, 1990. "Compensating Wage Differentials and the Duration of Wage Loss," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 8(1), pages 175-197, January.
    16. Ehrenberg, Ronald G. & Schwarz, Joshua L., 1987. "Public-sector labor markets," Handbook of Labor Economics, in: O. Ashenfelter & R. Layard (ed.), Handbook of Labor Economics, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 22, pages 1219-1260, Elsevier.
    17. Maria Kravtsova & Aleksey Oshchepkov, 2019. "Market and Network Corruption," Working Papers 380, Leibniz Institut für Ost- und Südosteuropaforschung (Leibniz Institute for East and Southeast European Studies).
    18. Luis Araujo & Vladimir Ponczek & André Portela Souza, 2016. "Informality in an economy with active labour courts," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(30), pages 2868-2882, June.
    19. Danielle Lamb & Rafael Gomez & Milad Moghaddas, 2022. "Unions and hazard pay for COVID‐19: Evidence from the Canadian Labour Force Survey," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 60(3), pages 606-634, September.
    20. repec:eee:labchp:v:1:y:1986:i:c:p:641-692 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Jessica Primoff Vistnes, 1997. "Gender Differences in Days Lost from Work Due to Illness," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 50(2), pages 304-323, January.
    22. Gary Solon, 1986. "Bias in Longitudinal Estimation of Wage Gaps," NBER Technical Working Papers 0058, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:clr:wugarc:y:1986v:12i:4p:507. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sepp Zuckerstaetter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/awakwat.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.