IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ces/ifosdt/v65y2012i15p35-39.html

Neuer Protektionismus – Gefahren für den Freihandel

Author

Listed:
  • Jasmin Katrin Gröschl

Abstract

In Zeiten des wirtschaftlichen Abschwungs greifen immer mehr Staaten zu weitreichenden protektionistischen Maßnahmen. Die Folgen des Protektionismus sind nicht zu unterschätzen, denn er schränkt den Freihandel nachhaltig ein und hemmt die wirtschaftliche Erholung. Dabei spielen im Gegensatz zu früher nicht-tarifäre Maßnahmen (NTMs) immer häufiger eine entscheidende Rolle. Diese neue Form des Protektionismus ist eine ernstzunehmende Bedrohung für den globalen Freihandel und die Weltwirtschaft.

Suggested Citation

  • Jasmin Katrin Gröschl, 2012. "Neuer Protektionismus – Gefahren für den Freihandel," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 65(15), pages 35-39, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:65:y:2012:i:15:p:35-39
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/ifosd_2012_15_4.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Felbermayr, Gabriel & Jung, Benjamin & Larch, Mario, 2013. "Optimal tariffs, retaliation, and the welfare loss from tariff wars in the Melitz model," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(1), pages 13-25.
    2. Crivelli, Pramila & Gröschl, Jasmin, 2012. "SPS measures and trade: Implementation matters," WTO Staff Working Papers ERSD-2012-05, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Teodora Borota & Fabrice Defever & Giammario Impullitti, 2019. "Innovation union: Costs and benefits of innovation policy coordination," Discussion Papers 2019-14, University of Nottingham, GEP.
    2. Bagwell, Kyle & Lee, Seung Hoon, 2020. "Trade policy under monopolistic competition with firm selection," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    3. Takatsuka, Hajime & Zeng, Dao-Zhi, 2016. "Nontariff protection without an outside good," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 65-78.
    4. Kohl, Miriam & Richter, Philipp M., 2023. "Unilateral tax policy in the open economy," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    5. Hassan Molana & Catia Montagna, 2016. "Selection, Trade, and Employment: The Strategic Use of Subsidies," Dundee Discussion Papers in Economics 296, Economic Studies, University of Dundee.
    6. Eyal RONEN, 2017. "Quantifying the trade effects of NTMs: A review of the empirical literature," Journal of Economics and Political Economy, KSP Journals, vol. 4(3), pages 263-274, September.
    7. Gabriel Felbermayr & Benjamin Jung, 2012. "Unilateral Trade Liberalization in the Melitz Model: A Note," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 32(2), pages 1724-1730.
    8. Julian Hinz & Elsa Leromain, 2020. "Critically Important: The Heterogeneous Effect of Diplomatic Tensions on Trade," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 57(2), pages 309-331, September.
    9. Allan Sørensen, 2020. "Export promotion and intra‐industry reallocations," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(2), pages 303-319, May.
    10. Gaubert, Cecile & Itskhoki, Oleg & Vogler, Maximilian, 2021. "Government policies in a granular global economy," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 95-112.
    11. Felbermayr, Gabriel J. & Larch, Mario & Lechthaler, Wolfgang, 2012. "Endogenous labor market institutions in an open economy," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 30-45.
    12. Allan Sørensen, 2022. "Spillovers from foreign business conditions," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 158(3), pages 779-814, August.
    13. José Manuel Álvarez Zárate (Editor), 2016. "¿Hacia dónde va América Latina respecto al derecho económico internacional?," Books, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Facultad de Derecho, number 860.
    14. Qasim, Ahmed Waqar & Itaya, Jun-ichi, 2019. "Trade Policy with Intermediate Inputs Trade," Discussion paper series. A 342, Graduate School of Economics and Business Administration, Hokkaido University.
    15. Atsushi Tadokoro, 2020. "Tariff policies, variable markups, and within-sector missallocation," Discussion Papers in Economics and Business 20-16, Osaka University, Graduate School of Economics.
    16. Forslid, Rikard & Okubo, Toshihiro & Ulltveit-Moe, Karen Helene, 2018. "Why are firms that export cleaner? International trade, abatement and environmental emissions," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 166-183.
    17. Hiroyuki Nishiyama & Azusa Fujimori & Takahiro Sato, 2022. "Regional disparities, firm heterogeneity, and the activity of Japanese manufacturing multinationals in India," Pacific Economic Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(5), pages 462-488, December.
    18. Luca Macedoni & Ariel Weinberger, 2025. "International Spillovers Of Quality Regulations," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 66(1), pages 453-484, February.
    19. Costinot, Arnaud & Rodríguez-Clare, Andrés, 2014. "Trade Theory with Numbers: Quantifying the Consequences of Globalization," Handbook of International Economics, in: Gopinath, G. & Helpman, . & Rogoff, K. (ed.), Handbook of International Economics, edition 1, volume 4, chapter 0, pages 197-261, Elsevier.
    20. Takumi Naito, 2021. "Can The Optimal Tariff Be Zero For A Growing Large Country?," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 62(3), pages 1237-1280, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • F13 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations
    • O10 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:65:y:2012:i:15:p:35-39. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifooode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.