IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ces/ifodic/v16y2018i01p14-17.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparison of Immigration Policies

Author

Listed:
  • Marc Helbling

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Marc Helbling, 2018. "A Comparison of Immigration Policies," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 16(01), pages 14-17, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:ces:ifodic:v:16:y:2018:i:01:p:14-17
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/dice-report-2018-1-helbling.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michel Beine & Anna Boucher & Brian Burgoon & Mary Crock & Justin Gest & Michael Hiscox & Patrick McGovern & Hillel Rapoport & Joep Schaper & Eiko Thielemann, 2016. "Comparing Immigration Policies: An Overview from the IMPALA Database," International Migration Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(4), pages 827-863, December.
    2. Liv Bjerre & Marc Helbling & Friederike Römer & Malisa Zobel, 2015. "Conceptualizing and Measuring Immigration Policies: A Comparative Perspective," International Migration Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(3), pages 555-600, September.
    3. Rainer Bauböck and Marc Helbling, 2011. "Which Indicators are Most Useful for Comparing Citizenship Policies?," EUI-RSCAS Working Papers 54, European University Institute (EUI), Robert Schuman Centre of Advanced Studies (RSCAS).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:ces:ifodic:v:16:y:2018:i:1:p:50000000001953 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Helbling, Marc & Michalowski, Ines, 2017. "A New Agenda for Immigration and Citizenship Policy Research," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 50(1), pages 3-13.
    3. Claudia Lumpe, 2019. "Public beliefs in social mobility and high-skilled migration," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 32(3), pages 981-1008, July.
    4. Leonardo Salvatore Alaimo & Francesco Amato & Filomena Maggino & Alfonso Piscitelli & Emiliano Seri, 2023. "A Comparison of Migrant Integration Policies via Mixture of Matrix-Normals," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 165(2), pages 473-494, January.
    5. Koopmans, Ruud & Michalowski, Ines, 2017. "Why Do States Extend Rights to Immigrants? Institutional Settings and Historical Legacies Across 44 Countries Worldwide," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 50(1), pages 41-74.
    6. Giacomo Solano & Thomas Huddleston, 2021. "Beyond immigration: Moving from Western to Global Indexes of Migration Policy," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 12(3), pages 327-337, May.
    7. Schmid, Samuel D. & Helbling, Marc, 2016. "Validating the Immigration Policies in Comparison (IMPIC) dataset," Discussion Papers, various Research Units SP VI 2016-202, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    8. Hugo Rojas-Romagosa & Johannes Bollen, 2018. "Estimating migration changes from the EU’s free movement of people principle," CPB Discussion Paper 385, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    9. Björn NILSSON, 2019. "Education and migration: insights for policymakers," Working Paper 23ca9c54-061a-4d60-967c-f, Agence française de développement.
    10. Sari Pekkala Kerr & William Kerr & Çağlar Özden & Christopher Parsons, 2017. "High-Skilled Migration and Agglomeration," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 9(1), pages 201-234, September.
    11. Guzi, Martin & Kahanec, Martin & Mýtna Kureková, Lucia, 2022. "The Impact of Immigration and Integration Policies On Immigrant-Native Labor Market Hierarchies," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1198, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    12. Michel Beine & Simone Bertoli & Jesús Fernández-Huertas Moraga, 2016. "A Practitioners’ Guide to Gravity Models of International Migration," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(4), pages 496-512, April.
    13. Mathias Czaika & Christopher R. Parsons, 2017. "The Gravity of High-Skilled Migration Policies," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 54(2), pages 603-630, April.
    14. Cadge, Wendy & Griera, Mar & Lucken, Kristen & Michalowski, Ines, 2017. "Religion in Public Institutions: Comparative Perspectives from the United States, the United Kingdom, and Europe," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 56(2), pages 226-233.
    15. Berger, Valentin & Bjerre, Liv & Breyer, Magdalena & Helbling, Marc & Römer, Friederike & Zobel, Malisa, 2024. "The Immigration Policies in Comparison (IMPIC) Dataset: Technical Report V2," Discussion Papers, various Research Units SP VI 2016-201r, WZB Berlin Social Science Center, revised 2024.
    16. Marc Helbling & Giacomo Solano, 2021. "Assembling – Not Reinventing – the Wheel. New Developments in the Field of Migration Policy Indices," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 12(3), pages 325-326, May.
    17. Rayp, Glenn & Ruyssen, Ilse & Standaert, Samuel, 2017. "Measuring and Explaining Cross-Country Immigration Policies," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 141-163.
    18. Axel Dreher & Martin Gassebner & Paul Schaudt, 2020. "The effect of migration on terror: Made at home or imported from abroad?," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 53(4), pages 1703-1744, November.
    19. Hakan Kilic & Gudrun Biffl, 2022. "Turkish Migration Policy from the 1960s Until Today: What National Development Plans Tell Us," Journal of International Migration and Integration, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 2047-2073, December.
    20. Lumpe, Claudia, 2017. "Public beliefs in social mobility and high-skilled migration," Ruhr Economic Papers 691, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    21. Albert MILLOGO & Ines TROJETTE & Nicolas PÉRIDY, 2021. "Are government policies efficient to regulate immigration? Evidence from France," Region et Developpement, Region et Developpement, LEAD, Universite du Sud - Toulon Var, vol. 53, pages 23-49.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • F22 - International Economics - - International Factor Movements and International Business - - - International Migration

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ifodic:v:16:y:2018:i:01:p:14-17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifooode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.