IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ccs/journl/y2019id439.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The EU-Russia Geopolitical Contradictions and Participation of the Post-Soviet States in Regional Economic Integration

Author

Listed:
  • A. S. Skriba
  • A. O. Altukhov

Abstract

Starting from the late 2000s, the Post-Soviet states have faced the so-called integration dilemma. Seeking to deepen their trade relations and economic links with the regional centers of force - the European Union and Russia - they found themselves increasingly compelled to choose between two integration projects: either joining the EU Association Agreement and Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area or developing relations with Russia and several other interested members of the CIS under the auspices of the Customs Union and Single Economic Space (Eurasian Economic Union since 2015).This paper purports to demonstrate that, although both tracks were declared to be economic by nature and were not publicly opposing each other, it was geopolitical reasoning that has dominated the deliberations of the five Eastern European members of the CIS in assessing and choosing between the two. The paper contrasts these countries’ political strategies and approaches to the integration dilemma and examines the internal and external factors behind these approaches. We explain why, despite the apparent similarity of the economies and interests of some of the states in question, their political strategies have diverged considerably under changing geopolitical circumstances. Finally, the paper evaluates the prospects of further engagement of Eastern European CIS countries in the integration projects.

Suggested Citation

  • A. S. Skriba & A. O. Altukhov, 2019. "The EU-Russia Geopolitical Contradictions and Participation of the Post-Soviet States in Regional Economic Integration," Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law, Center for Crisis Society Studies, vol. 12(2).
  • Handle: RePEc:ccs:journl:y:2019:id:439
    DOI: 10.23932/2542-0240-2019-12-2-51-70
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ogt-journal.com/jour/article/viewFile/439/390
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.23932/2542-0240-2019-12-2-51-70?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Willem te Velde, Dirk, 2011. "Regional Integration, Growth and Convergence," Journal of Economic Integration, Center for Economic Integration, Sejong University, vol. 26, pages 1-28.
    2. Athanasios Vamvakidis, 1999. "Regional Trade Agreements or Broad Liberalization: Which Path Leads to Faster Growth?," IMF Staff Papers, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 46(1), pages 1-3.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Angkeara Bong & Gamini Premaratne, 2018. "Regional Integration and Economic Growth in Southeast Asia," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 19(6), pages 1403-1415, December.
    2. M. G. C. N. Madadeniya & S. Sivarajasingham, 2018. "Which Is Better For Economic Growth In Sri Lanka, Trade With Saarc Or Trade With Asean?," Journal of Smart Economic Growth, , vol. 3(3), pages 95-116, December.
    3. G.D.N.M Godagampala, 2018. "Impact Of Investments In Human Capital Determinants On Economic Growth: Time Series Analysis Based On Sri Lanka," Journal of Smart Economic Growth, , vol. 3(3), pages 85-93, December.
    4. Alan V. Deardorff & Robert M. Stern, 2004. "EU Expansion and EU Growth," International Economic Association Series, in: Alan V. Deardorff (ed.), The Past, Present and Future of the European Union, chapter 5, pages 74-102, Palgrave Macmillan.
    5. Teweldemedhin, M.Y. & van Schalkwyk, Herman D., 2010. "The impact of trade liberalisation on South African agricultural productivity," 2010 AAAE Third Conference/AEASA 48th Conference, September 19-23, 2010, Cape Town, South Africa 95963, African Association of Agricultural Economists (AAAE).
    6. Ibrahim, Muazu, 2020. "Effects of trade and financial integration on structural transformation in Africa: New evidence from a sample splitting approach," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 556(C).
    7. Burçak Polat & Antonio Rodríguez Andrés, 2017. "Trade openness, labour market rigidity and economic growth: A dynamic panel data analysis," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 28(4), pages 555-564, December.
    8. Dodzin, Sergei & Vamvakidis, Athanasios, 2004. "Trade and industrialization in developing economies," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(1), pages 319-328, October.
    9. Tarun Bose & Jannatul Bristy, 2017. "Are Countries Participating into Regional Integration Performing Better in Growth and Liberalization Than Non-Participators? A Study on European Countries," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(2), pages 171-171, January.
    10. Kenneth Chan & Vinh Dang, 2010. "Multilateral trade and export-led growth in the world economy: some post-war evidence," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 38(3), pages 689-703, June.
    11. Blaise Gnimassoun, 2019. "How to Boost the Impact of Intra-African Trade on Income in Africa?," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 541-557, July.
    12. Stiglitz, Joseph E., 2000. "Capital Market Liberalization, Economic Growth, and Instability," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 1075-1086, June.
    13. Olivier Peron & Serge Rey, 2012. "Trade and convergence of per capita income in the Indian Ocean Zone, 1950–2008," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 49(3), pages 657-683, December.
    14. Enoch Kwaw-Nimeson & Ze Tian, 2023. "Institutional Quality, Foreign Direct Investment, and Regional Integration: Empirical Evidence From CEN-SAD," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(1), pages 21582440221, January.
    15. Shankaran Nambiar & Arunnan Balasubramaniam, 2016. "Does ASEAN–India Trade Stimulate Income? A Cointegration Analysis Using the ARDL Approach," South Asia Economic Journal, Institute of Policy Studies of Sri Lanka, vol. 17(2), pages 295-314, September.
    16. Faiza Umer & Shaista Alam, 2015. "Trade Openness, Size of Economy and the Saving–Investment Relationship: A Dynamic Analysis for Pakistan," South Asian Journal of Macroeconomics and Public Finance, , vol. 4(2), pages 233-257, December.
    17. Park, Jun-ki & Ryu, Deockhyun & Lee, Keun, 2019. "What determines the economic size of a nation in the world: Determinants of a nation’s share in world GDP vs. per capita GDP," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 203-214.
    18. Brodzicki Tomasz, 2003. "In search for accumulative effects of European economic integration," International Trade 0310006, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Kadigi, Reuben M.J. & Robinson, Elizabeth & Szabo, Sylvia & Kangile, Joseph & Mgeni, Charles P. & De Maria, Marcello & Tsusaka, Takuji & Nhau, Brighton, 2022. "Revisiting the Solow-Swan model of income convergence in the context of coffee producing and re-exporting countries in the world," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 115636, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    20. Takfarinas Saber & Dominik Naeher & Philippe Lombaerde, 2023. "On the Optimal Size and Composition of Customs Unions: An Evolutionary Approach," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 62(4), pages 1457-1479, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ccs:journl:y:2019:id:439. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Кривопалов Ð Ð»ÐµÐºÑ ÐµÐ¹ Ð Ð»ÐµÐºÑ ÐµÐµÐ²Ð¸Ñ‡ (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.