IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cbu/jrnlec/y2024v4p86-100.html

Accounting In The Context Of Corporate Governance: Empirical Study Based On Companies Listed On The Bucharest Stock Exchange

Author

Listed:
  • BIRCA ALIONA

    (ACADEMY OF ECONOMIC STUDIES OF MOLDOVA, ROMANIAN ACADEMY)

  • GRIGOROI LILIA

    (ACADEMY OF ECONOMIC STUDIES OF MOLDOVA)

  • MIHAI OLESIA

    (ALEXANDRU IOAN CUZA UNIVERSITY OF IASI)

Abstract

This study explores accounting in terms of its openness towards new trends of the capital market in the context of globalization and continuously changing needs of various categories of users. The theoretical framework of the study explores the relations between traditional elements of financial and managerial accounting in correlation with new trends generated by the development of sustainable corporate governance. Strategic managerial accounting has been one of the new challenges brought by the need of companies to disclose their non-financial information related to internal and external environment for short, medium and long-term decision-making. The authors look at the regulatory framework in order to underline the evolution and conditions that businesses should comply with in their internal and external reporting. For this purpose, annual reports of main companies listed on the Bucharest Stock Exchange have been used in the empirical study. Specifically, the study proves that that the elements of modern accounting cannot ignore key operations of company management. In this context, such information as risk management, evaluation of investment, corporate social responsibility, internal audit, internal control, managerial strategies, financial reporting, performance and stewardship are becoming very important.

Suggested Citation

  • Birca Aliona & Grigoroi Lilia & Mihai Olesia, 2024. "Accounting In The Context Of Corporate Governance: Empirical Study Based On Companies Listed On The Bucharest Stock Exchange," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 4, pages 86-100, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2024:v:4:p:86-100
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.utgjiu.ro/revista/ec/pdf/2024-04/10_Aliona.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shyam Sunder, 2015. "Risk in Accounting," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 51(4), pages 536-548, December.
    2. Mary E. Barth & Wayne R. Landsman & Mark H. Lang, 2008. "International Accounting Standards and Accounting Quality," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 46(3), pages 467-498, June.
    3. Iatridis, George, 2010. "International Financial Reporting Standards and the quality of financial statement information," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 193-204, June.
    4. Brickley, James A. & Dark, Frederick H., 1987. "The choice of organizational form The case of franchising," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 401-420, June.
    5. Ahmet C. Kurt, 2018. "How Do Financial Constraints Relate to Financial Reporting Quality? Evidence from Seasoned Equity Offerings," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(3), pages 527-557, May.
    6. Annukka Jokipii, 2010. "Determinants and consequences of internal control in firms: a contingency theory based analysis," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 14(2), pages 115-144, May.
    7. Yugang Yin & Rongfu Tian, 2017. "Investor Sentiment, Financial Report Quality and Stock Price Crash Risk: Role of Short-Sales Constraints," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(3), pages 493-510, March.
    8. Tiago Gonçalves & Cristina Gaio & André Ferro, 2021. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Earnings Management: Moderating Impact of Economic Cycles and Financial Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-14, September.
    9. James A. Brickley & Clifford W. Smith & Jerold L. Zimmerman, 2003. "Corporate Governance, Ethics, And Organizational Architecture," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 15(3), pages 34-45, March.
    10. Phillips, Robert & Freeman, R. Edward & Wicks, Andrew C., 2003. "What Stakeholder Theory is Not," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(4), pages 479-502, October.
    11. Panagiotis E. Dimitropoulos, 2020. "Corporate social responsibility and earnings management in the EU: a panel data analysis approach," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 18(1), pages 68-84, December.
    12. Martin Hilb, 2016. "New Corporate Governance," Management for Professionals, Springer, edition 5, number 978-3-662-49060-0, May.
    13. Andrew L. Friedman & Samantha Miles, 2002. "Developing Stakeholder Theory," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(1), pages 1-21, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang Deng & Tze San Ong & Rosmila Senik, 2024. "Trick or treat? A bibliometric literature review of corporate social responsibility and earnings management," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 4361-4383, September.
    2. Yuan Ding & Thomas Jeanjean & Hervé Stolowy, 2013. "Accounting for Stakeholders or Shareholders? The Case of R&D Reporting," Post-Print hal-01002936, HAL.
    3. Elbakry, Ashraf E. & Nwachukwu, Jacinta C. & Abdou, Hussein A. & Elshandidy, Tamer, 2017. "Comparative evidence on the value relevance of IFRS-based accounting information in Germany and the UK," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 10-30.
    4. Cle‐Anne Gabriel & Kamran Shafique, 2024. "An ethical salience framework to achieve sustainable development goals," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(4), pages 3213-3225, August.
    5. Hela Turki & Senda Wali & Younes Boujelbène, 2016. "IFRS, Environnement Informationnel et Pertinence des chiffres comptables," Post-Print hal-01901074, HAL.
    6. Hiney, Noel & Efthymiou, Marina & Morgenroth, Edgar, 2023. "Impact of Covid-19 on Irish airport stakeholder relationships," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    7. Eliwa, Yasser & Haslam, Jim & Abraham, Santhosh, 2021. "Earnings quality and analysts’ information environment: Evidence from the EU market," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 42(C).
    8. Samantha Miles, 2017. "Stakeholder Theory Classification: A Theoretical and Empirical Evaluation of Definitions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 142(3), pages 437-459, May.
    9. Liu, Chengyun & Su, Kun & Zhang, Miaomiao, 2021. "Water disclosure and financial reporting quality for social changes: Empirical evidence from China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    10. Mihaela Ionascu & Ion Ionascu & Marian Sacarin & Mihaela Minu, 2018. "Benefits of global financial reporting models for developing markets: The case of Romania," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(11), pages 1-24, November.
    11. M N, Nikhil & S Shenoy, Sandeep & Chakraborty, Suman & B M, Lithin, 2023. "Does the Ind AS moderate the relationship between capital structure and firm performance?," MPRA Paper 119541, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 15 Oct 2023.
    12. Abdulrahman Alomair & Alan Farley & Helen Hong Yang, 2022. "The impact of IFRS adoption on the value relevance of accounting information in Saudi Arabia," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(2), pages 2839-2878, June.
    13. Yakovleva, Natalia & Vazquez-Brust, Diego Alfonso, 2018. "Multinational mining enterprises and artisanal small-scale miners: From confrontation to cooperation," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 52-62.
    14. Persakis, Anthony & Iatridis, George Emmanuel, 2015. "Earnings quality under financial crisis: A global empirical investigation," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 1-35.
    15. Hela Turki & Senda Wali & Younes Boujelbene, 2016. "The effect of IFRS mandatory adoption on the information asymmetry," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(1), pages 1209100-120, December.
    16. Louis Maximilian Ronalter & Merce Bernardo & Javier Manuel Romaní, 2023. "Quality and environmental management systems as business tools to enhance ESG performance: a cross-regional empirical study," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(9), pages 9067-9109, September.
    17. Gatluak Gach Chuol Thony & Anthony Duku Peter, 2023. "The Impact of Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standard on Quality of Accounting Information in South Sudan: A Case Study of Kenya Commercial Bank and Cooperative Bank," International Journal of Science and Business, IJSAB International, vol. 19(1), pages 28-48.
    18. Najeb Masoud, 2017. "The effects of mandatory IFRS adoption on financial analysts’ forecast: Evidence from Jordan," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 1290331-129, January.
    19. Rodríguez García, Martha del Pilar & Cortez Alejandro, Klender Aimer & Méndez Sáenz, Alma Berenice & Garza Sánchez, Héctor Horacio, 2017. "Does an IFRS adoption increase value relevance and earnings timeliness in Latin America?," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 155-168.
    20. Chan, Ann L.-C. & Hsu, Audrey W.-H. & Lee, Edward, 2015. "Mandatory adoption of IFRS and timely loss recognition across Europe: The effect of corporate finance incentives," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 70-82.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2024:v:4:p:86-100. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ecobici Nicolae (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fetgjro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.