IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cbu/jrnlec/y2018v3p253-260.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial Economic Impacts Of Workplace Innovation In Eu-28 And Norway

Author

Listed:
  • ERDEI RAUL

    (WEST UNIVERSITY OF TIMIȘOARA, ROMANIA)

  • MOROC ANDREI

    (WEST UNIVERSITY OF TIMIȘOARA, ROMANIA)

Abstract

Knowledge has become a key driver in the contemporary economy, and economic growth through knowledge is constantly at the center of attention concerning specialists, business people, political decision-makers, and individuals in general. The creation and distribution of knowledge, technologies, and new products are components of human activity, through which companies can develop in an environment that is subject to strong challenges and shocks, in a dynamic, global, competitive, but also very uneven economy. The research involves the development of a study that helps to better understand the forms of work organization through workplace innovation and their effects on economic and social performance at European level, thus suggesting a range of intervention directions and activities to support the overall goal of raising living standards. The implications assessment and influences of work organization on innovation performance (European Commission, 2017) was carried out at national level using EWCS survey data for the years 2005, 2010 and 2015 and the impact measures of innovation were considered in terms of employment in knowledge-intensive activities. The estimated results highlight the effects, including spatial, positive and negative, in assessing the role of national factorial dimensions in employment growth, for which discretionary learning (DL) and Taylorism (TA) forms of work organization seem to have the most significant influence.

Suggested Citation

  • Erdei Raul & Moroc Andrei, 2018. "Spatial Economic Impacts Of Workplace Innovation In Eu-28 And Norway," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 3, pages 253-260, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2018:v:3:p:253-260
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.utgjiu.ro/revista/ec/pdf/2018-03/34_Erdei.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Edward Lorenz, 2015. "Work Organisation, Forms of Employee Learning and Labour Market Structure: Accounting for International Differences in Workplace Innovation," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 6(2), pages 437-466, June.
    2. Anthony Arundel & Edward Lorenz & Bengt-Åke Lundvall & Antoine Valeyre, 2007. "How Europe's economies learn: a comparison of work organization and innovation mode for the EU-15," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 16(6), pages 1175-1210, December.
    3. Edward Lorenz & Antoine Valeyre, 2005. "Organisational Innovation, HRM and Labour Market Structure," Post-Print halshs-00483643, HAL.
    4. Frank Pot & Peter Totterdill & Steven Dhondt, 2016. "Workplace innovation: European policy and theoretical foundation," World Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(1), pages 13-32.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Erdei Raul & Barnutiu Octavian, 2018. "Forms Of Work Organization And Regional Performance In Eu-28 And Norway," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 3, pages 171-178, June.
    2. Kassem HAMMOUD, 2018. "Comparative Analysis Of Innovative Forms Of Work Organization At European Level," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 12(1), pages 367-377, November.
    3. Bengt-åke Lundvall, 2013. "The ‘new new deal’ as a response to the euro-crisis," Chapters, in: Mats Benner (ed.), Before and Beyond the Global Economic Crisis, chapter 8, pages 151-172, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Edward Lorenz, 2015. "Work Organisation, Forms of Employee Learning and Labour Market Structure: Accounting for International Differences in Workplace Innovation," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 6(2), pages 437-466, June.
    5. Lundvall , Bengt-Åke & Vang , Jan & Joseph , KJ & Chaminade , Cristina, 2013. "Bridging Innovation System Research and Development Studies: challenges and research opportunities," Papers in Innovation Studies 2013/33, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    6. Edward Lorenz, 2013. "Innovation, work Organisation and Systems of Social Protection," Post-Print halshs-00931547, HAL.
    7. Arundel, Anthony & Casali, Luca & Hollanders, Hugo, 2015. "How European public sector agencies innovate: The use of bottom-up, policy-dependent and knowledge-scanning innovation methods," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(7), pages 1271-1282.
    8. Armanda Cetrulo & Dario Guarascio & Maria Enrica Virgillito, 2020. "Anatomy of the Italian occupational structure: concentrated power and distributed knowledge," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 29(6), pages 1345-1379.
    9. Hadia Baassiry, 2019. "Le management des compétences dans les pme innovantes : étude de cas au sein du secteur vitivinicole au Liban [Le Management Des Compétences Dans Les Pme Innovantes : Étude De Cas Au Sein Du Secteu," Post-Print hal-02868443, HAL.
    10. Stefano Dughera, 2020. "Skills, preferences and rights: evolutionary complementarities in labor organization," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 843-866, July.
    11. Jana Schmutzler & Edward Lorenz, 2018. "Tolerance, agglomeration, and enterprise innovation performance: a multilevel analysis of Latin American regions," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 27(2), pages 243-268.
    12. Malo Mofakhami, 2022. "Is Innovation Good for European Workers? Beyond the Employment Destruction/Creation Effects, Technology Adoption Affects the Working Conditions of European Workers," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(3), pages 2386-2430, September.
    13. Hadia Baassiry, 2019. "Le management des compétences dans les PME innovantes : étude de cas du secteur vitivinicole au Liban," Post-Print hal-02068648, HAL.
    14. Arocena, Rodrigo & Göransson, Bo & Sutz, Judith, 2015. "Knowledge policies and universities in developing countries: Inclusive development and the “developmental university”," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 10-20.
    15. Tatjana Boczy & Ruggero Cefalo & Andrea Parma & Rikke Skovgaard Nielsen, 2020. "Positioning the Urban in the Global Knowledge Economy: Increasing Competitiveness or Inequality," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 194-207.
    16. Helge Svare & Anne Haugen Gausdal, 2017. "Dynamic capabilities and network benefits," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 13(1), pages 117-146.
    17. Stoika Radu & Nen Madlena, 2014. "Future Strategies In Human Resources. Study Case: Romania," Balkan Region Conference on Engineering and Business Education, Sciendo, vol. 1(1), pages 569-572, August.
    18. Bengt-åke Lundvall, 2012. "One Knowledge Base or Many Knowledge Pools?," Chapters, in: Richard Arena & Agnès Festré & Nathalie Lazaric (ed.), Handbook of Knowledge and Economics, chapter 13, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    19. David Marsden, 2015. "The future of the German industrial relations model [Die Zukunft des deutschen Modells der Arbeitsbeziehungen]," Journal for Labour Market Research, Springer;Institute for Employment Research/ Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), vol. 48(2), pages 169-187, August.
    20. Soete, Luc & Verspagen, Bart & ter Weel, Bas, 2010. "Systems of Innovation," Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, in: Bronwyn H. Hall & Nathan Rosenberg (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 0, pages 1159-1180, Elsevier.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2018:v:3:p:253-260. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ecobici Nicolae The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Ecobici Nicolae to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fetgjro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.