IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cbu/jrnlec/y2014vspecialp178-184.html

Qualitative Aspects Of Performance Evaluation Using The Example Of Romanian Economy Sectors

Author

Listed:
  • BURJA VASILE

    (“1 DECEMBRIE 1918” UNIVERSITY OF ALBA IULIA)

  • ALINA VOICULESCU

    (“1 DECEMBRIE 1918” UNIVERSITY OF ALBA IULIA)

Abstract

Company’s performance is an essential objective pursued by investors and stakeholders, both for investments decision making and for verifying the way their interests are fulfilled. Calculation of different performance indicators can lead to conflicting results. The current paper aims to analyze the way in which performance of various Romanian economical sector is reflected by different profitability ratios. The results of the research highlights both advantages and limits of several absolute and relative indicators which express performance and offers an image of the hierarchy of the economical sectors subject to analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Burja Vasile & Alina Voiculescu, 2014. "Qualitative Aspects Of Performance Evaluation Using The Example Of Romanian Economy Sectors," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 0, pages 178-184, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2014:v:special:p:178-184
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.utgjiu.ro/revista/ec/pdf/2014-04.Special/32_Burja%20V,%20Voiculescu.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eslava, Marcela & Haltiwanger, John & Kugler, Adriana & Kugler, Maurice, 2004. "The effects of structural reforms on productivity and profitability enhancing reallocation: evidence from Colombia," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(2), pages 333-371, December.
    2. Camelia Burja & Vasile Burja, 2009. "Analysis of Companies’ Economic Performance Using the Profitability Rates," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 99-110.
    3. Erickson, Kenneth W. & Moss, Charles B. & Mishra, Ashok K., 2004. "Rates of Return in the Farm and Nonfarm Sectors: How Do They Compare?," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 36(3), pages 789-795, December.
    4. Eslava, Marcela & Haltiwanger, John & Kugler, Adriana & Kugler, Maurice, 2004. "The effects of structural reforms on productivity and profitabality enhancing reallocation: evidence from Colombia," Discussion Paper Series In Economics And Econometrics 0408, Economics Division, School of Social Sciences, University of Southampton.
    5. Claudia BURTESCU, 2010. "The reflection of the company's profitability and liquidity in the accounting result," Scientific Bulletin - Economic Sciences, University of Pitesti, issue 9, pages 83-88.
    6. Inna Dynko, 2013. "Evolution of the Concept of Profit: Theoretical Aspect," Oblik i finansi, Institute of Accounting and Finance, issue 2, pages 128-133, June.
    7. Silvio Contessi & Ariel Weinberger, 2009. "Foreign direct investment, productivity, and country growth: an overview," Review, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, vol. 91(Mar), pages 61-78.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Miron Vasile Cristian Ioachim & Avram (Boitos) Camelia & Mihalcea Mihaela Maria, 2017. "Profit And Loss Account – Synthetic Expression Of Absolute Return," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 4, pages 191-196, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Joel M. David & Venky Venkateswaran, 2019. "The Sources of Capital Misallocation," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 109(7), pages 2531-2567, July.
    2. Lucas Navarro, 2012. "Plant level evidence on product mix changes in Chilean manufacturing," The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(2), pages 165-195, February.
    3. Andrea Lasagni & Annamaria Nifo & Gaetano Vecchione, 2015. "Firm Productivity And Institutional Quality: Evidence From Italian Industry," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(5), pages 774-800, November.
    4. Ghulam, Yaseen, 2021. "Institutions and firms’ technological changes and productivity growth," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    5. Gatti, Roberta & Love, Inessa, 2006. "Does access to credit improve productivity ? Evidence from Bulgarian firms," Policy Research Working Paper Series 3921, The World Bank.
    6. Djankov, Simeon & Ramalho, Rita, 2009. "Employment laws in developing countries," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 3-13, March.
    7. Pierce, Justin R., 2011. "Plant-level responses to antidumping duties: Evidence from U.S. manufacturers," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(2), pages 222-233.
    8. Filippo Biondi & Sergio Inferrera & Matthias Mertens & Javier Miranda, 2023. "Declining Business Dynamism in Europe: The Role of Shocks, Market Power, and Technology," Jena Economics Research Papers 2023-011, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
    9. Benavente, José Miguel & Zuñiga, Pluvia, 2022. "How Does Market Competition Affect Firm Innovation Incentives in Emerging Countries? Evidence from Chile and Colombia," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 12198, Inter-American Development Bank.
    10. Enghin Atalay, 2014. "Materials Prices And Productivity," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 12(3), pages 575-611, June.
    11. Massimiliano Calì & Marco Le Moglie & Giorgio Presidente, 2024. "Gain without pain? Non‐tariff measures, plant markup, and productivity," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(3), pages 1364-1397, August.
    12. Kugler, Maurice, 2006. "Spillovers from foreign direct investment: Within or between industries?," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(2), pages 444-477, August.
    13. Mertens, Matthias & Schoefer, Benjamin, 2024. "From Labor to Intermediates: Firm Growth, Input Substitution, and Monopsony," IZA Discussion Papers 17461, IZA Network @ LISER.
    14. Marcela Eslava & Marcela Melendez, 2009. "Politics, Policies and the Dynamics of Aggregate Productivity in Colombia," Research Department Publications 4633, Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department.
    15. Mertens, Matthias, 2020. "Labor market power and the distorting effects of international trade," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    16. Doan Thi Thanh Ha & Kozo Kiyota & Kenta Yamanouchi, 2016. "Misallocation and Productivity: The Case of Vietnamese Manufacturing," Asian Development Review, MIT Press, vol. 33(2), pages 94-118, September.
    17. Juan José Echavarría & Iader Giraldo-Salazar & Fernando Jaramillo-Mejía, 2019. "Protección y productividad en la industria colombiana, 1993-2011," Chapters, in: Jorge García-García & Enrique Montes-Uribe & Iader Giraldo-Salazar (ed.), Comercio exterior en Colombia: política, instituciones, costos y resultados, chapter 8, pages 323-343, Banco de la Republica de Colombia.
    18. Ulrich Doraszelski & Jordi Jaumandreu, 2018. "Measuring the Bias of Technological Change," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 126(3), pages 1027-1084.
    19. Camila Casas & Federico J. Diez & Alejandra Gonzalez & Stefany Moreno, 2015. "Productivity and export market participation: evidence from Colombia," Working Papers 14-14, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
    20. Maurice Kugler & Eric Verhoogen, 2012. "Prices, Plant Size, and Product Quality," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 79(1), pages 307-339.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2014:v:special:p:178-184. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ecobici Nicolae (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fetgjro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.