IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cbk/journl/v2y2013i2p19-34.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Expanding and Diversifying Montenegro’s Exports: A Product Space Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Željko Bogetić

    (Lead Economist and Country Sector Coordinator for Western Balkans at the World Bank)

  • Igor Pejović

    (Lecturer at Higher School of Economic in Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Israel Osorio-Roddarte

    (Consultant at the World Bank)

Abstract

This paper provides an analysis of the export potential and export diversification of Montenegro. Based on this analysis as well as a review of international experience and field discussions, the paper also provides policy recommendations for exploiting its considerable export potential and engendering export diversification. The Product Space (PS) methodology is used to identify prospective comparative advantage by making inferences from the revealed pattern of trade. The indicated products in which Product Space methodology points to export potential have links to information available to entrepreneurs and producers that can be expected to be reflected in private investment decisions and decisions regarding entry into export markets. The analysis shows that Montenegro currently has a limited and highly concentrated export base but it is also in the middle of a major transformation towards a much more tourism and services based economy. The policy challenge is how to foster this process to fully tap into its potential for exports and diversification. Exports allow entrepreneurs and producers in small economies to expand beyond the limitations of the domestic market size. Successful export potential has been realized in other countries through openness in international trade and allowing the private sector to judge profitable opportunities. Thanks to its superior geographic location, adequate human capital and infrastructure base, and natural resources, Montenegro has been found to possess substantial export potential, which could turn into its major growth engine. To convert this potential into success, Montenegro will need to rebalance the role of government policy and improve local incentives towards entrepreneurship and exports. The important policy role of government in Montenegro is to correct mismatches between educational preferences of students and the human-capital requirements for export success. The other important role of government is to foster greater infrastructure connectivity (especially via air, rail and roads, but also the greater use opportunities offered by sea trade and port logistics services). The government also should maintain and promote an open trading regime and flexible, neutral regulatory environment. Finally, the government should avoid subsidizing particular firms or sectors at the expense of taxpayers or other firms or sectors. This would likely distort incentives and channel local private and public resources into rent-seeking as opposed to efforts to improve skills, products, and productivity.

Suggested Citation

  • Željko Bogetić & Igor Pejović & Israel Osorio-Roddarte, 2013. "Expanding and Diversifying Montenegro’s Exports: A Product Space Analysis," Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice, Central bank of Montenegro, vol. 2(2), pages 19-34.
  • Handle: RePEc:cbk:journl:v:2:y:2013:i:2:p:19-34
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.cbcg.me/repec/cbk/journl/vol2no2-2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ricardo Hausmann & Bailey Klinger, 2007. "The Structure of the Product Space and the Evolution of Comparative Advantage," CID Working Papers 146, Center for International Development at Harvard University.
    2. Edgardo M. Favaro, 2008. "Small States, Smart Solutions : Improving Connectivity and Increasing the Effectiveness of Public Services," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 6416, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:cbk:journl:v:2:y:2013:i:1:p:19-34 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Edurne Magro Montero & Mari Jose Aranguren & Mikel Navarro, 2011. "Smart Specialisation Strategies: The Case of the Basque Country," Working Papers 2011R07, Orkestra - Basque Institute of Competitiveness.
    3. Florent Silve & Alexander Plekhanov, 2018. "Institutions, innovation and growth : Evidence from industry data," The Economics of Transition, The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, vol. 26(3), pages 335-362, July.
    4. Hailu, Degol & Kipgen, Chinpihoi, 2017. "The Extractives Dependence Index (EDI)," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 251-264.
    5. Naved Hamid & Maha Khan, 2015. "Pakistan: A Case of Premature Deindustrialization?," Lahore Journal of Economics, Department of Economics, The Lahore School of Economics, vol. 20(Special E), pages 107-141, September.
    6. Lyubimov, Ivan & Gvozdeva, Margarita & Lysyuk, Maria, 2018. "Towards increased complexity in Russian regions : networks, diversification and growth," BOFIT Discussion Papers 8/2018, Bank of Finland, Institute for Economies in Transition.
    7. Berg, Andrew & Ostry, Jonathan D. & Zettelmeyer, Jeromin, 2012. "What makes growth sustained?," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(2), pages 149-166.
    8. Bahar, Dany & Hausmann, Ricardo & Hidalgo, Cesar A., 2014. "Neighbors and the evolution of the comparative advantage of nations: Evidence of international knowledge diffusion?," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(1), pages 111-123.
    9. Duygu Buyukyazici & Leonardo Mazzoni & Massimo Riccaboni & Francesco Serti, 2022. "Workplace Skills as Regional Capabilities: Relatedness, Complexity and Industrial Diversification of Regions," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2210, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Jun 2022.
    10. Boschma, Ron & Capone, Gianluca, 2015. "Institutions and diversification: Related versus unrelated diversification in a varieties of capitalism framework," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(10), pages 1902-1914.
    11. Ricardo Hausmann & Bailey Klinger, 2008. "Growth Diagnostics: Perú," Research Department Publications 2005, Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department.
    12. Chen, Zhao & Poncet, Sandra & Xiong, Ruixiang, 2017. "Inter-industry relatedness and industrial-policy efficiency: Evidence from China’s export processing zones," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 809-826.
    13. Richard Baldwin, 2013. "Trade and Industrialization after Globalization's Second Unbundling: How Building and Joining a Supply Chain Are Different and Why It Matters," NBER Chapters, in: Globalization in an Age of Crisis: Multilateral Economic Cooperation in the Twenty-First Century, pages 165-212, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    14. Piotr Gabrielczak & Tomasz Serwach, 2017. "The impact of the euro adoption on the complexity of goods in Slovenian exports," Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci/Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Economics and Business, vol. 35(1), pages 45-71.
    15. Nicola D Coniglio & Raffaele Lagravinese & Davide Vurchio & Massimo Armenise, 2018. "The pattern of structural change: testing the product space framework," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 27(4), pages 763-785.
    16. Nomaler, Önder & Verspagen, Bart, 2022. "Some new views on product space and related diversification," MERIT Working Papers 2022-011, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    17. David Rigby, 2012. "The Geography of Knowledge Relatedness and Technological Diversification in U.S. Cities," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1218, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Oct 2012.
    18. Long, Cheryl & Zhang, Xiaobo, 2012. "Patterns of China's industrialization: Concentration, specialization, and clustering," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 593-612.
    19. Jie Cai & Nan Li & Ana Maria Santacreu, 2022. "Knowledge Diffusion, Trade, and Innovation across Countries and Sectors," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 14(1), pages 104-145, January.
    20. Jeroen Content & Nicola Cortinovis & Koen Frenken & Jacob Jordaan, 2022. "The roles of KIBS and R&D in the industrial diversification of regions," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 68(1), pages 29-64, February.
    21. T.E. Uberti & M.A. Maggioni & E. Marrocu & S. Usai, 2023. "The role of localised, recombinant and exogenous technological change in European regions," Working Paper CRENoS 202303, Centre for North South Economic Research, University of Cagliari and Sassari, Sardinia.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Exports; Trade; Competitiveness; Diversification; Montenegro;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F14 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Empirical Studies of Trade
    • O24 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Development Planning and Policy - - - Trade Policy; Factor Movement; Foreign Exchange Policy
    • O52 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies - - - Europe

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cbk:journl:v:2:y:2013:i:2:p:19-34. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cbmgvme.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.