IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlswr/v9y2014i1id33-2012-swr.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Regional analysis using the Geomorphologic Instantaneous Unit Hydrograph (GIUH) method

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammad Reza KHALEGHI

    (Department of Range and Watershed Management, Teheran Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran)

  • Jamal GHODUSI

    (Department of Range and Watershed Management, Teheran Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran)

  • Hassan AHMADI

    (Department of Range and Watershed Management, Teheran Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran)

Abstract

The construction of design flood hydrographs for ungauged drainage areas has traditionally been approached by regionalization, i.e. the transfer of information from the gauged to the ungauged catchments in a region. Such approaches invariably depend upon the use of multiple linear regression analysis to relate unit hydrograph parameters to catchment characteristics and generalized rainfall statistics. In the present study, Geomorphologic Instaneous Unit Hydrograph (GIUH) was applied to simulate the rainfall-runoff process and also to determine the shape and dimensions of outlet runoff hydrographs in a 37.1 km2 area in the Ammameh catchment, located at northern Iran. The first twenty-one equivalent rainfall-runoff events were selected, and a hydrograph of outlet runoff was calculated for each event. An intercomparison was made for the three applied approaches in order to propose a suitable model approach that is the overall objective of this study. Hence, the time to peak and peak flow of outlet runoff in the models were then compared, and the model that most efficiently estimated hydrograph of outlet flow for similar regions was determined. Statistical analyses of the models demonstrated that the GIUH model had the smallest main relative and square error. The results obtained from the study confirmed the high efficiency of the GIUH and its ability to increase simulation accuracy for runoff and hydrographs. The modified GIUH approach as described is therefore recommended for further investigation and intercomparison with regression-based regionalization methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammad Reza KHALEGHI & Jamal GHODUSI & Hassan AHMADI, 2014. "Regional analysis using the Geomorphologic Instantaneous Unit Hydrograph (GIUH) method," Soil and Water Research, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 9(1), pages 25-30.
    • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlswr:v:9:y:2014:i:1:id:33-2012-swr
    DOI: 10.17221/33/2012-SWR
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://swr.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/33/2012-SWR.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://swr.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/33/2012-SWR.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/33/2012-SWR?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. H. Christopher Frey & Sumeet R. Patil, 2002. "Identification and Review of Sensitivity Analysis Methods," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(3), pages 553-578, June.
    2. Vikrant Jain & R. Sinha, 2003. "Derivation of Unit Hydrograph from GIUH Analysis for a Himalayan River," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 17(5), pages 355-376, October.
    3. S. Jain & R. Singh & S. Seth, 2000. "Design Flood Estimation Using GIS Supported GIUHApproach," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 14(5), pages 369-376, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mohammad Reza KHALEGHI, 2017. "The influence of deforestation and anthropogenic activities on runoff generation," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 63(6), pages 245-253.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. A. Sarangi & C. Madramootoo & P. Enright & S. Prasher, 2007. "Evaluation of three unit hydrograph models to predict the surface runoff from a Canadian watershed," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 21(7), pages 1127-1143, July.
    2. Emna Ellouze-Gargouri & Zoubeida Bargaoui, 2012. "Runoff Estimation for an Ungauged Catchment Using Geomorphological Instantaneous Unit Hydrograph (GIUH) and Copulas," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 26(6), pages 1615-1638, April.
    3. Samuel Beskow & Lloyd Norton & Carlos Mello, 2013. "Hydrological Prediction in a Tropical Watershed Dominated by Oxisols Using a Distributed Hydrological Model," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 27(2), pages 341-363, January.
    4. Makam, Vaishno Devi & Millossovich, Pietro & Tsanakas, Andreas, 2021. "Sensitivity analysis with χ2-divergences," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 372-383.
    5. S. Cucurachi & E. Borgonovo & R. Heijungs, 2016. "A Protocol for the Global Sensitivity Analysis of Impact Assessment Models in Life Cycle Assessment," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(2), pages 357-377, February.
    6. Wenlin Yuan & Meiqi Liu & Fang Wan, 2019. "Study on the impact of rainfall pattern in small watersheds on rainfall warning index of flash flood event," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 97(2), pages 665-682, June.
    7. Agee, Philip & Nikdel, Leila & McCoy, Andrew & Kianpour rad, Simin & Gao, Xinghua, 2024. "Manufactured housing: Energy burden outcomes from measured and simulated building performance data," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    8. Emanuele Borgonovo, 2006. "Measuring Uncertainty Importance: Investigation and Comparison of Alternative Approaches," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(5), pages 1349-1361, October.
    9. Jose Luiz F. Barbosa & Antonio P. Coimbra & Dan Simon & Wesley P. Calixto, 2022. "Optimization Process Applied in the Thermal and Luminous Design of High Power LED Luminaires," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-28, October.
    10. Carla L. Simões & Ricardo Simoes & Ana Sofia Gonçalves & Leonel J. R. Nunes, 2023. "Environmental Analysis of the Valorization of Woody Biomass Residues: A Comparative Study with Vine Pruning Leftovers in Portugal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-16, October.
    11. Retno Agustarini & Yetti Heryati & Yelin Adalina & Wahyu Catur Adinugroho & Dhany Yuniati & Rizki Ary Fambayun & Gerhard Eli Sabastian & Asep Hidayat & Hesti Lestari Tata & William Ingram & Aulia Perd, 2022. "The Development of Indigofera spp. as a Source of Natural Dyes to Increase Community Incomes on Timor Island, Indonesia," Economies, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-30, February.
    12. Sumeet R. Patil & H. Christopher Frey, 2004. "Comparison of Sensitivity Analysis Methods Based on Applications to a Food Safety Risk Assessment Model," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(3), pages 573-585, June.
    13. Anzhi Wang & Changjie Jin & Jianmei Liu & Tiefan Pei, 2006. "A Modified Hortonian Overland Flow Model Based on Laboratory Experiments," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 20(2), pages 181-192, April.
    14. Abdo Abdullah Ahmed Gassar & Choongwan Koo & Tae Wan Kim & Seung Hyun Cha, 2021. "Performance Optimization Studies on Heating, Cooling and Lighting Energy Systems of Buildings during the Design Stage: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-47, September.
    15. repec:plo:pone00:0218123 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Luigi Dolores & Maria Macchiaroli & Gianluigi De Mare, 2022. "Financial Impacts of the Energy Transition in Housing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-17, April.
    17. Mariem Ellouze & Jean‐Pierre Gauchi & Jean‐Christophe Augustin, 2010. "Global Sensitivity Analysis Applied to a Contamination Assessment Model of Listeria monocytogenes in Cold Smoked Salmon at Consumption," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(5), pages 841-852, May.
    18. Sinan Xiao & Zhenzhou Lu & Pan Wang, 2018. "Multivariate Global Sensitivity Analysis Based on Distance Components Decomposition," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(12), pages 2703-2721, December.
    19. Andreas Binder & Onkar Jadhav & Volker Mehrmann, 2021. "Error Analysis of a Model Order Reduction Framework for Financial Risk Analysis," Papers 2110.00774, arXiv.org.
    20. Babak Jafarizadeh, 2022. "Forecasts of Prices and Informed Sensitivity Analysis: Applications in Project Valuations," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 19(3), pages 205-219, September.
    21. João Delgado & Simon Pollard & Kerry Pearn & Emma L. Snary & Edgar Black & George Prpich & Phil Longhurst, 2017. "U.K. Foot and Mouth Disease: A Systemic Risk Assessment of Existing Controls," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(9), pages 1768-1782, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlswr:v:9:y:2014:i:1:id:33-2012-swr. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.