IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlcjg/v47y2011ispecialissueid3272-cjgpb.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Farmers' preference and informal seed dissemination of first Ug99 tolerant wheat variety in Bangladesh

Author

Listed:
  • D.B. PANDIT

    (Wheat Research Centre, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute, Nashipur, Dinajpur, Bangladesh)

  • M.S.N. MANDAL

    (Wheat Research Centre, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute, Nashipur, Dinajpur, Bangladesh)

  • M.A. HAKIM

    (Wheat Research Centre, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute, Nashipur, Dinajpur, Bangladesh)

  • N.C.D. BARMA

    (Regional Wheat Research Centre, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute, Joydebpur, Gazipur, Bangladesh)

  • T.P. TIWARI

    (International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Bangladesh)

  • A.K. JOSHI

    (International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), South Asia Office, Kathmandu, Nepal)

Abstract

Farmers' preference study and informal seed dissemination was carried out through farmer participatory variety selection (PVS) during 2006-2007 to 2008-2009 by the Wheat Research Centre (WRC), Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI), Dinajpur, Bangladesh, in collaboration with CIMMYT. Four varieties including widely grown Shatabdi and four advance lines including Ug99 tolerant BAW 1064 were tested in mother-baby trial approach in 8 villages in each year. Mother trials were researcher designed but farmer managed. However, baby trials were designed and managed by farmers themselves. Preference scores of 30 farmers for varieties were recorded two times viz., pre and post-harvest stages. Farmers' preferred BAW 1064 owing to its 10% yield superiority over the widely grown Shatabdi variety, bolder white grains, larger grains/spike, non-lodging behaviour, earliness and resistance to diseases. This variety was found moderately resistant to Ug99 in Kenya. BAW 1064 was released as BARI Gom 26 in March 2010. After three years of PVS work, 19.4 t seeds reached informally to 969 farmers of 24 PVS villages from only 252 kg source seeds supplied for trials. In 2009-2010, seed production of this variety was done in 44 ha; 33.8 ha in 111 farmers' fields and 10.2 ha in research stations. Around 150 t seeds were produced that are being used for further testing and multiplication in 2010-2011. Seed dissemination through PVS was much faster than official approach of Bangladesh Agriculture Development Corporation (BADC). Hence, for selection and dissemination of CIMMYT developed Ug99 tolerant lines, farmer-participatory approach is being deployed.

Suggested Citation

  • D.B. Pandit & M.S.N. Mandal & M.A. Hakim & N.C.D. Barma & T.P. Tiwari & A.K. Joshi, 2011. "Farmers' preference and informal seed dissemination of first Ug99 tolerant wheat variety in Bangladesh," Czech Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 47(SpecialIs), pages 160-164.
    • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlcjg:v:47:y:2011:i:specialissue:id:3272-cjgpb
    DOI: 10.17221/3272-CJGPB
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://cjgpb.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/3272-CJGPB.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://cjgpb.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/3272-CJGPB.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/3272-CJGPB?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bellon, Mauricio R., 2001. "Participatory Research Methods For Technology Evaluation: A Manual For Scientists Working With Farmers," Manuals 23717, CIMMYT: International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center.
    2. Sperling, Louise & Loevinsohn, Michael E., 1993. "The dynamics of adoption: Distribution and mortality of bean varieties among small farmers in Rwanda," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 41(4), pages 441-453.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Morris, Michael L. & Risopoulos, Jean & Beck, David, 1999. "Genetic Change in Farmer-Recycled Maize Seed: A Review of the Evidence," Economics Working Papers 7683, CIMMYT: International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center.
    2. Mujeyi, Kingstone & Chamunorwa-Mujeyi, Angeline, 2013. "Commercialization of Under-Utilized Plant Species in Zimbabwe: The Case of Jatropha (Jatropha curcas) in Mutoko District," 2013 Fourth International Conference, September 22-25, 2013, Hammamet, Tunisia 161285, African Association of Agricultural Economists (AAAE).
    3. Ram Rana & Chris Garforth & Bhuwon Sthapit & Devra Jarvis, 2007. "Influence of socio-economic and cultural factors in rice varietal diversity management on-farm in Nepal," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 24(4), pages 461-472, December.
    4. Smale, M. & Bellon, M. R. & Aguirre, J. A. & Manuel Rosas, I. & Mendoza, J. & Solano, A. M. & Martinez, R. & Ramirez, A. & Berthaud, J., 2003. "The economic costs and benefits of a participatory project to conserve maize landraces on farms in Oaxaca, Mexico," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 265-275, December.
    5. Bellon, Mauricio R., 2004. "Conceptualizing Interventions to Support On-Farm Genetic Resource Conservation," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 159-172, January.
    6. Soniia David & Louise Sperling, 1999. "Improving technology delivery mechanisms: Lessons from bean seed systems research in eastern and central Africa," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 16(4), pages 381-388, December.
    7. Tschakert, Petra, 2007. "Environmental services and poverty reduction: Options for smallholders in the Sahel," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 94(1), pages 75-86, April.
    8. Bienvenue Zoma-Traoré & Lorenz Probst & Salifou Ouédraogo-Koné & Albert Soudré & Dominique Ouédraogo & Bernadette Yougbaré & Amadou Traoré & Negar Khayatzadeh & Gábor Mészáros & Pamela Anna Burger & O, 2021. "Livestock Keepers’ Attitudes: Keystone of Effective Community-Based Breeding Programs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-14, February.
    9. Henry, Fred Ojulong & Elias, Letayo & Loveness, Sakwera & Rukwa, Ziwa & Frida, Mgonja & Patrick ,Sheunda & Joseph, Kibuka & Daniel, Otwani & Patrick, Audi & Mary, Mgonja & Emmanuel, Manyasa, 2017. "Participatory Variety Selection for enhanced promotion and adoption of improved finger millet varieties: A case for Singida and Iramba Districts in Central Tanzania," African Journal of Rural Development (AFJRD), AFrican Journal of Rural Development (AFJRD), vol. 2(1), March.
    10. Milada Šťastná & Veronika Peřinková & Pavla Pokorná & Antonín Vaishar, 2019. "New Approach to Sustainability in Rural Areas Comprising Agriculture Practices–Analysis of Demonstration Farms in the Czech Republic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-14, May.
    11. Tomonori Yokouchi & Kazuki Saito, 2016. "Factors affecting farmers’ adoption of NERICA upland rice varieties: the case of a seed producing village in central Benin," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 8(1), pages 197-209, February.
    12. Robert Tripp, 1995. "Regulatory Options for a Changing Agricultural Scenario: The Case of Seed Certification," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 13(4), pages 407-422, December.
    13. Nagarajan, Latha & Smale, Melinda, 2005. "Local seed systems and village-level determinants of millet crop diversity in marginal environments of India:," EPTD discussion papers 135, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    14. Cash, David & Clark, William & Alcock, Frank & Dickson, Nancy & Eckley, Noelle & Jager, Jill, 2002. "Salience, Credibility, Legitimacy and Boundaries: Linking Research, Assessment and Decision Making," Working Paper Series rwp02-046, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    15. Bellon, Mauricio R., 2001. "Demand and Supply of Crop Infraspecific Diversity on Farms: Towards a Policy Framework for On-Farm Conservation," Economics Working Papers 7666, CIMMYT: International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center.
    16. Ronner, E. & Descheemaeker, K. & Almekinders, C. & Ebanyat, P. & Giller, K.E., 2019. "Co-design of improved climbing bean production practices for smallholder farmers in the highlands of Uganda," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 1-12.
    17. Tomonori Yokouchi & Kazuki Saito, 2016. "Factors affecting farmers’ adoption of NERICA upland rice varieties: the case of a seed producing village in central Benin," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 8(1), pages 197-209, February.
    18. Tschakert, Petra & Coomes, Oliver T. & Potvin, Catherine, 2007. "Indigenous livelihoods, slash-and-burn agriculture, and carbon stocks in Eastern Panama," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(4), pages 807-820, February.
    19. Ronner, E. & Descheemaeker, K. & Marinus, W. & Almekinders, C.J.M. & Ebanyat, P. & Giller, K.E., 2018. "How do climbing beans fit in farming systems of the eastern highlands of Uganda? Understanding opportunities and constraints at farm level," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 97-110.
    20. Bouba Traore & Birhanu Zemadim Birhanu & Seydou Sangaré & Murali Krishna Gumma & Ramadjita Tabo & Anthony Michael Whitbread, 2021. "Contribution of Climate-Smart Agriculture Technologies to Food Self-Sufficiency of Smallholder Households in Mali," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-17, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlcjg:v:47:y:2011:i:specialissue:id:3272-cjgpb. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.