IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bus/jphile/v15y2022i1n5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

‘Freedom’ on the Road to Ruin: An Australian Apology to America’s Freedom-Loving Hard Right

Author

Listed:
  • L Duhs

    (University of Queensland (Australia))

Abstract

Contemporary America faces deep-seated problems - not least because so many Americans have lost respect for their own electoral system and democratic institutions. America suffers too from unrelenting right wing hyperbole in respect of significant social issues, including their conviction that only they understand, and value, freedom. Because of Australia’s restrictive responses to the covid-19 pandemic, Florida’s Governor Ron DeSantis – a potential Presidential candidate - denigrates Australia as ‘not a free country; not a free country at all’. Australians may dismiss Governor DeSantis’s comments as laughable, but a chorus of hard right comments in support of his view invites a comparison of the different ways in which ‘freedom’ is understood in Republican America and in Australia. One consequence of DeSantis’s conception of ‘freedom’ is the extraordinary American death rate from the Covid-19 pandemic, which in the case of Florida – which DeSantis celebrates as the ‘free-est State’ – stood at about 48 times the Australian rate when he scorned Australia as indistinguishable from communist China. Despite massive American spending on defence budgets, a domestic battle has been waged, and lost, in respect of the more prosaic defence of America’s traditional economic philosophy, and its defining institutions; and American conservatives are now divided even within their own ranks as to what it is that they wish to conserve, other than partisan advantage. The roots of America’s present malaise are to be found in the evolving (mis)understandings of a set of keywords including ‘freedom’, ‘democracy’, ‘tyranny’, ‘individualism’, and ‘society’. The radical right has impoverished the understanding of these keywords, and Australia’s pandemic response was in fact designed to give itself freedom from the ‘freedom’ that the Republican right now eulogises. In the name of an implicit and contentious teleological vision, the Republican understanding of ‘freedom’ has now descended to the point where America’s hard right perversely sees itself as actually now needing to save Australia from democracy, while simultaneously undermining its own democratic institutions. The need for a reinvigorated teaching of economic philosophy is plain to see.

Suggested Citation

  • L Duhs, 2022. "‘Freedom’ on the Road to Ruin: An Australian Apology to America’s Freedom-Loving Hard Right," The Journal of Philosophical Economics, Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, The Journal of Philosophical Economics, vol. 15(1), pages 124-157.
  • Handle: RePEc:bus:jphile:v:15:y:2022:i:1:n:5
    DOI: 10.46298/jpe.9763
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://jpe.episciences.org/10393/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.46298/jpe.9763
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.46298/jpe.9763?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stefan Collignon, 2018. "Negative and positive liberty and the freedom to choose in Isaiah Berlin and Jean-Jacques Rousseau," The Journal of Philosophical Economics, Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, The Journal of Philosophical Economics, vol. 12(1), pages 36-64, November.
    2. Alan Duhs, 1998. "Five dimensions of the interdependence of philosophy and economics integrating HET and the history of political philosophy," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 25(10), pages 1477-1508, November.
    3. Stiglitz, Joseph E., 2021. "The proper role of government in the market economy: The case of the post-COVID recovery," Journal of Government and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 1(C).
    4. L.A. Duhs, 2008. "SEN'S ECONOMIC PHILOSOPHY Capabilities and Human Development in the Revival of Economics as a Moral Science," Discussion Papers Series 366, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. L A Duhs, 2022. "‘Freedom’ on the Road to Ruin: An Australian Apology to America’s Freedom-Loving Hard Right," Working Papers hal-03701554, HAL.
    2. L A Duhs, 2022. "‘Freedom’ on the Road to Ruin: An Australian Apology to America’s Freedom-Loving Hard Right," Post-Print hal-03701554, HAL.
    3. Any Flore Djoumessi Djoukouo, 2023. "Recessions and recoveries in Central African countries: Lessons from the past," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(6), pages 1121-1142, August.
    4. repec:thr:techub:10027:y:2022:i:1:p:452-462 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Lei Wang & Thomas Stephen Ramsey, 2023. "Will falling domestic labor compensation share really be improved when global trade slowdown?," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-12, December.
    6. Xu, Nuo & Kasimov, Ikboljon & Wang, Yanan, 2022. "Unlocking private investment as a new determinant of green finance for renewable development in China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 1121-1130.
    7. Joanna Wyrwa & Magdalena ZaraÅ› & Katarzyna Wolak, 2021. "Smart Solutions in Cities during the Covid-19 Pandemic," Virtual Economics, The London Academy of Science and Business, vol. 4(2), pages 88-103, April.
    8. James E. Alvey, 2011. "A Short History of Ethics and Economics," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 12674.
    9. Liu, Yang & Dilanchiev, Azer & Xu, Kaifei & Hajiyeva, Aytan Merdan, 2022. "Financing SMEs and business development as new post Covid-19 economic recovery determinants," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 554-567.
    10. Witold Chmielarz & Marek Zborowski & Mesut Atasever & Jin Xuetao & Justyna Szpakowska, 2023. "The Role of ICT in Creating the Conscious Development of Green Energy Applications in Times of Crisis: Comparison of Poland, Türkiye and People's Republic of China," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 492-519.
    11. Upravitelev, A., 2023. "Efficacious methods of restraining COVID-19 through behavioral public policy," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 61(4), pages 203-222.
    12. Muh. Ruslan Abdullah & Fasiha Fasiha & Abd. Kadir Arno, 2022. "Reincarnation of MSMEs after the Government's Policy on Economic Recovery Due to the Covid-19 Pandemic in Indonesia," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 27(1), pages 452-462, January.
    13. Bowbrick, Peter, 2020. "Toxic famine research and how it suppresses its critics," MPRA Paper 101970, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Jiam Song & Kwangmin Jung & Jonghun Kam, 2023. "Evidence of the time-varying impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on online search activities relating to shopping products in South Korea," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-12, December.
    15. Chang, Lei & Taghizadeh-Hesary, Farhad & Saydaliev, Hayot Berk, 2022. "How do ICT and renewable energy impact sustainable development?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 123-131.
    16. Ziming Li & Xiangming Chen & Lei Wang, 2022. "A tale of two recoveries: uncovering the imbalance between state-driven production and private consumption in post-pandemic Wuhan, China [Evaluation of local leaders in China]," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 15(3), pages 725-746.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    freedom; democracy; pandemic responses; tyranny; radical right; radical philosophical re-interpretations; [SHS.ECO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and Finance;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D72 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bus:jphile:v:15:y:2022:i:1:n:5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Valentin Cojanu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.