IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/qld/uq2004/366.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

SEN'S ECONOMIC PHILOSOPHY Capabilities and Human Development in the Revival of Economics as a Moral Science

Author

Abstract

Sen joins a line of economists - including Cropsey, Schumacher, Myrdal, Ward, Higgins and Etzioni - who have objected to the implicit political philosophy within orthodox neo-classical economics. He argues that the good or just society requires policies to remove all forms of �unfreedoms�, and policies to equalise the extent of capability deprivation. This capabilities approach calls for a rejection of utilitarianism, libertarianism and Rawlsianism in favour of the conception of justice provided by his putatively Smithian/Aristotelian approach. In taking the expansion of freedom to be both the principal end and the principal means of development, however, Sen ignores other philosophical positions which lead to quite different conclusions. Accordingly, his argument remains incomplete and unpersuasive, and the most fundamental questions remain to be resolved.

Suggested Citation

  • L.A. Duhs, 2008. "SEN'S ECONOMIC PHILOSOPHY Capabilities and Human Development in the Revival of Economics as a Moral Science," Discussion Papers Series 366, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
    • Handle: RePEc:qld:uq2004:366
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://economics.uq.edu.au/files/44567/366.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Benjamin Ward, 1972. "What’s Wrong with Economics II," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: What’s Wrong with Economics?, chapter 16, pages 237-246, Palgrave Macmillan.
    2. Amartya Sen, 1997. "Development and Thinking at the Beginning of the 21st Century," STICERD - Development Economics Papers - From 2008 this series has been superseded by Economic Organisation and Public Policy Discussion Papers 02, Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines, LSE.
    3. Benjamin Ward, 1972. "What’s Wrong with Economics?," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-1-349-01806-2, December.
    4. Pettit, Philip, 2001. "Symposium on Amartya Sen's philosophy: 1 Capability and freedom: a defence of Sen," Economics and Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 17(1), pages 1-20, April.
    5. Sen, Amartya K, 1979. "Personal Utilities and Public Judgements: Or What's Wrong with Welfare Economics?," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 89(355), pages 537-558, September.
    6. Benjamin Ward, 1972. "What’s Wrong with Economics I," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: What’s Wrong with Economics?, chapter 6, pages 89-92, Palgrave Macmillan.
    7. Sen, Amartya, 1997. "Development thinking at the beginning of the 21st century," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 6711, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. L A Duhs, 2022. "‘Freedom’ on the Road to Ruin: An Australian Apology to America’s Freedom-Loving Hard Right," Working Papers hal-03701554, HAL.
    2. L Duhs, 2022. "‘Freedom’ on the Road to Ruin: An Australian Apology to America’s Freedom-Loving Hard Right," The Journal of Philosophical Economics, Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, The Journal of Philosophical Economics, vol. 15(1), pages 124-157.
    3. James E. Alvey, 2011. "A Short History of Ethics and Economics," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 12674.
    4. Bowbrick, Peter, 2020. "Toxic famine research and how it suppresses its critics," MPRA Paper 101970, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kakarot-Handtke, Egmont, 2010. "Axiomatic Basics of e-Economics," MPRA Paper 24331, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. M. Akram Khan, 1984. "Islamic Economics: Nature and Need الاقتصاد الإسلامي: الطبيعة والحاجة," Journal of Research in Islamic Economics, King Abdulaziz University, Islamic Economics Institute., vol. 1(2), pages 51-55, July.
    3. Muhammad Anas Zarqa, 2003. "Islamization of Economics: The Concept and Methodology تحقيق إسلامية علم الاقتصاد: المفهوم والمنهج," Journal of King Abdulaziz University: Islamic Economics, King Abdulaziz University, Islamic Economics Institute., vol. 16(1), pages 3-42, January.
    4. Charles Wilber, 2004. "Ethics, human behavior and the methodology of social economics," Forum for Social Economics, Springer;The Association for Social Economics, vol. 33(2), pages 19-50, March.
    5. T.A. Boylan & P.F. O'Gorman, 2007. "Axiomatization And Formalism In Economics," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(3), pages 426-446, July.
    6. repec:abd:kauiea:oldjournal:v:1:y:1984:i:2:no:4:p:51-55 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Wicks, Rick, 2011. "Assumption without representation: the unacknowledged abstraction from communities and social goods," MPRA Paper 51674, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Muriel Gilardone, 2018. "The influence of Sen’s applied economics on his “social choice” approach to justice: agency at the core of public action to remove injustice," Economics Working Paper from Condorcet Center for political Economy at CREM-CNRS 2018-01-ccr, Condorcet Center for political Economy.
    9. Antonio Andreoni, 2013. "Rethinking Microfinance: Towards relational credit practices for sustainability," RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA', FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2013(1), pages 181-190.
    10. Viput Ongsakul & Salil K. Sen, 2019. "Low Carbon Energy Symbiosis for Sustainability: Review of Shared Value-based Policy Metabolism to Enhance the Implementability of the Sustainable Development Goals in Asia," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 9(2), pages 24-30.
    11. Antonio Andreoni & Ha-Joon Chang & Isabel Estevez, 2021. "The Missing Dimensions of the Human Capabilities Approach: Collective and Productive," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 33(2), pages 179-205, April.
    12. Maurizio Sajeva & Marjo Maidell & Jonne Kotta & Anneliis Peterson, 2020. "An Eco-GAME Meta-Evaluation of Existing Methods for the Appreciation of Ecosystem Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-47, September.
    13. Nadeem Ul Haque & Durr-e-Nayab, 2022. "Opportunity to Excel: Now and the Future (Presidential Address)," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 61(1), pages 105-137.
    14. Nadeem Ul Haque & Durr-e-Nayab, 2022. "Pakistan Opportunity To Excel: Now And The Future," PIDE Monograph Series 2022:1, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics.
    15. Antonio Andreoni & Ha-Joon Chang, 2017. "Bringing production and employment back into development: Alice Amsden’s legacy for a new developmentalist agenda," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 10(1), pages 173-187.
    16. Mina Baliamoune-Lutz, 2004. "On the Measurement of Human Well-being: Fuzzy Set Theory and Sen's Capability Approach," WIDER Working Paper Series RP2004-16, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    17. Kjell Brekke & Hilde Lurå & Karine Nyborg, 1996. "Allowing disagreement in evaluations of social welfare," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 63(3), pages 303-324, October.
    18. Vincenzo Atella & Jay Coggins & Federico Perali, 2005. "Aversion to inequality in Italy and its determinants," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 2(2), pages 117-144, January.
    19. Tony J Culyer & Alan Wagstaff, 1991. "Need, equality and social justice," Working Papers 090chedp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
    20. Antoinette Baujard, 2016. "Utilitarianism and anti-utilitarianism," Chapters, in: Gilbert Faccarello & Heinz D. Kurz (ed.), Handbook on the History of Economic Analysis Volume III, chapter 40, pages 576-588, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    21. Suzumura, Kotaro & Xu, Yongsheng, 2001. "Characterizations of Consequentialism and Nonconsequentialism," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 101(2), pages 423-436, December.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:qld:uq2004:366. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SOE IT (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/decuqau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.