Modeling Tactical Changes of Formation in Association Football as a Zero-Sum Game
Although tactical decisions made by managers during a match of team sports are very important, there have been few quantitative analyses which include the effect of interaction between both teams decisions, because of the complexity of the problem where one teams decision will affect the other teams. A game theoretic approach can be useful for tackling this type of problem.This paper proposes a game theoretic approach to modeling tactical changes of formation in an association football match. We assume probabilities of scoring and conceding a goal follow Poisson distributions and use a regression model to evaluate the means of the distributions. These means represent the offensive strength for scoring a goal and defensive propensity to concede a goal in terms of a teams formation, i.e. a combination of the number of each type of outfield player on the pitch, and are estimated by means of the maximum likelihood method. We then develop a mathematical formulation with which we can calculate the probability of the home team winning the match, and use it to analyse tactical changes of the teams formations, modeling the football match as a zero-sum game, in which the gain in probability of one team winning is equal to the loss in probability of the other team winning. We demonstrate how the managers decisions affect the probability of winning the match using real data of the Japan professional football league, by showing four cases of the quality of both managers decisions, depending on whether they each use their best or worst strategies.There still remains some uncertainty and longer observational studies will be required for a complete analysis, but this method can help to evaluate quantitatively the quality of tactical decisions made by managers.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 2 (2006)
Issue (Month): 2 (April)
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: https://www.degruyter.com|
|Order Information:||Web: https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/jqas|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:jqsprt:v:2:y:2006:i:2:n:4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Peter Golla)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.