IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/jossai/v7y2019i4p317-329n2.html

How the Investor’s Risk Preferences Influence the Optimal Allocation in a Credibilistic Portfolio Problem

Author

Listed:
  • Georgescu Irina

    (Department of Economic Cybernetics, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Kinnunen Jani

    (Abo Akademi University, Tuomiokirkkotori 3, Turku, 20500, Finland)

Abstract

A classical portfolio theory deals with finding the optimal proportion in which an agent invests a wealth in a risk-free asset and a probabilistic risky asset. Formulating and solving the problem depend on how the risk is represented and how, combined with the utility function defines a notion of expected utility. In this paper the risk is a fuzzy variable and the notion of expected utility is defined in the setting of Liu’s credibility theory. Thus, the portfolio choice problem is formulated as an optimization problem in which the objective function is a credibilistic expected utility. Different approximation calculation formulas for the optimal allocation of the credibilistic risky asset are proved. These formulas contain two types of parameters: Various credibilistic moments associated with fuzzy variables (expected value, variance, skewness and kurtosis) and the risk aversion, prudence and temperance indicators of the utility function.

Suggested Citation

  • Georgescu Irina & Kinnunen Jani, 2019. "How the Investor’s Risk Preferences Influence the Optimal Allocation in a Credibilistic Portfolio Problem," Journal of Systems Science and Information, De Gruyter, vol. 7(4), pages 317-329, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:jossai:v:7:y:2019:i:4:p:317-329:n:2
    DOI: 10.21078/JSSI-2019-317-13
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.21078/JSSI-2019-317-13
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.21078/JSSI-2019-317-13?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zakamouline, Valeri & Koekebakker, Steen, 2009. "Portfolio performance evaluation with generalized Sharpe ratios: Beyond the mean and variance," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 33(7), pages 1242-1254, July.
    2. Irina Georgescu & Jani Kinnunen, 2016. "Credibilistic risk aversion and prudence," International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 11(1), pages 146-160.
    3. Kimball, Miles S, 1990. "Precautionary Saving in the Small and in the Large," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 58(1), pages 53-73, January.
    4. Ñíguez, Trino-Manuel & Paya, Ivan & Peel, David, 2016. "Pure higher-order effects in the portfolio choice model," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 19(C), pages 255-260.
    5. Sadefo Kamdem, Jules & Tassak Deffo, Christian & Fono, Louis Aimé, 2012. "Moments and semi-moments for fuzzy portfolio selection," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 517-530.
    6. Christian Gollier, 2004. "The Economics of Risk and Time," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262572249, December.
    7. Irina Georgescu, 2018. "The Effect of Prudence on the Optimal Allocation in Possibilistic and Mixed Models," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 6(8), pages 1-19, August.
    8. L. Eeckhoudt & C. Gollier & H. Schlesinger, 2005. "Economic and financial decisions under risk," Post-Print hal-00325882, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Irina Georgescu & Louis Aimé Fono, 2019. "A Portfolio Choice Problem in the Framework of Expected Utility Operators," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-16, July.
    2. Irina Georgescu, 2018. "The Effect of Prudence on the Optimal Allocation in Possibilistic and Mixed Models," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 6(8), pages 1-19, August.
    3. Irina Georgescu, 2019. "Expected utility operators and coinsurance problem," Papers 1908.06927, arXiv.org.
    4. Danau, Daniel, 2020. "Prudence and preference for flexibility gain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(2), pages 776-785.
    5. Carnero, M. Angeles & León, Angel & Ñíguez, Trino-Manuel, 2023. "Skewness in energy returns: estimation, testing and retain-->implications for tail risk," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 178-189.
    6. Gabriele Cardullo & Luca Beltrametti, 2025. "Monitoring and prudence," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 146(2), pages 221-235, October.
    7. Loubergé, Henri & Malevergne, Yannick & Rey, Béatrice, 2020. "New Results for additive and multiplicative risk apportionment," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 140-151.
    8. Masamitsu Ohnishi & Yusuke Osaki, 2005. "The Monotonicity of Asset Prices with Changes in Risk," Discussion Papers in Economics and Business 05-14, Osaka University, Graduate School of Economics.
    9. Louis Eeckhoudt & Harris Schlesinger, 2006. "Putting Risk in Its Proper Place," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 96(1), pages 280-289, March.
    10. Corneo, Giacomo, 2015. "Volkswirtschaftliche Bewertung öffentlicher Investitionen," Discussion Papers 2015/12, Free University Berlin, School of Business & Economics.
    11. Chang, Jen-Wen, 2020. "Monitoring and competing principals: A double-edged sword," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    12. Christian Gollier, 2003. "Collective Risk-Taking Decisions with Heterogeneous Beliefs," CESifo Working Paper Series 909, CESifo.
    13. Olivier Rousse & Benoît Sévi, 2005. "Behavioral Heterogeneity in the US Sulfur Dioxide Emissions Allowance Trading Program," ERSA conference papers ersa05p550, European Regional Science Association.
    14. Koeniger, Winfried, 2002. "The Dynamics of Market Insurance, Insurable Assets, and Wealth Accumulation," IZA Discussion Papers 615, IZA Network @ LISER.
    15. Chavas, Jean-Paul, 2013. "On the microeconomics of food and malnutrition under endogenous discounting," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 80-96.
    16. Takehito Masuda & Eungik Lee, 2019. "Higher order risk attitudes and prevention under different timings of loss," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 22(1), pages 197-215, March.
    17. León, Angel & Moreno, Manuel, 2017. "One-sided performance measures under Gram-Charlier distributions," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 38-50.
    18. X. H. Wang & Carmen Menezes, 2002. "The Precautionary Premium and the Risk-Downside Risk Tradeoff," Working Papers 0204, Department of Economics, University of Missouri, revised 16 May 2002.
    19. Bonilla, Claudio A. & Vergara, Marcos, 2013. "Credit rationing or entrepreneurial risk aversion? A comment," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 120(2), pages 329-331.
    20. Baiardi, Donatella & De Donno, Marzia & Magnani, Marco & Menegatti, Mario, 2015. "New results on precautionary saving under two risks," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 17-20.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:jossai:v:7:y:2019:i:4:p:317-329:n:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyterbrill.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.