IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/jossai/v7y2019i1p70-89n5.html

Aggregation Similarity Measure Based on Hesitant Fuzzy Closeness Degree and Its Application to Clustering Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Wang Feng

    (School of Mathematics and Statistics, Chaohu University, Hefei238000, China)

Abstract

In order to distinguish with effect different hesitant fuzzy elements (HFEs), we introduce the asymmetrical relative entropy between HFEs as a distance measure for higher discernment. Next, the formula of attribute weights is derived via an optimal model according to TOPSIS from the relative closeness degree constructed by the discerning relative entropy. Then, we propose the concept of co-correlation degree from the viewpoint of probability theory and develop another new formula of hesitant fuzzy correlation coefficient, and prove their similar properties to the traditional correlation coefficient. To make full use of the existing similarity measures including the ones presented by us, we consider aggregation of similarity measures for hesitant fuzzy sets and derive the synthetical similarity formula. Finally, the derived formula is used for netting clustering analysis under hesitant fuzzy information and the effectiveness and superiority are verified through a comparison analysis of clustering results obtained by other clustering algorithms.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang Feng, 2019. "Aggregation Similarity Measure Based on Hesitant Fuzzy Closeness Degree and Its Application to Clustering Analysis," Journal of Systems Science and Information, De Gruyter, vol. 7(1), pages 70-89, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:jossai:v:7:y:2019:i:1:p:70-89:n:5
    DOI: 10.21078/JSSI-2019-070-20
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.21078/JSSI-2019-070-20
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.21078/JSSI-2019-070-20?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bin Zhu & Zeshui Xu & Meimei Xia, 2012. "Dual Hesitant Fuzzy Sets," Journal of Applied Mathematics, Hindawi, vol. 2012, pages 1-13, May.
    2. Zeshui Xu & Hui Hu, 2010. "Projection Models For Intuitionistic Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 9(02), pages 267-280.
    3. Stamelos, Ioannis & Tsoukias, Alexis, 2003. "Software evaluation problem situations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(2), pages 273-286, March.
    4. Bustince, H. & Jurio, A. & Pradera, A. & Mesiar, R. & Beliakov, G., 2013. "Generalization of the weighted voting method using penalty functions constructed via faithful restricted dissimilarity functions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 225(3), pages 472-478.
    5. Xiaolu Zhang & Zeshui Xu, 2015. "Hesitant fuzzy agglomerative hierarchical clustering algorithms," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(3), pages 562-576, February.
    6. Meimei Xia & Zeshui Xu & Na Chen, 2013. "Some Hesitant Fuzzy Aggregation Operators with Their Application in Group Decision Making," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 259-279, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chunyong Wang & Qingguo Li & Xiaoqiang Zhou, 2014. "Multiple Attribute Decision Making Based on Generalized Aggregation Operators under Dual Hesitant Fuzzy Environment," Journal of Applied Mathematics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2014(1).
    2. Dheeraj Kumar Joshi & Ismat Beg & Sanjay Kumar, 2018. "Hesitant Probabilistic Fuzzy Linguistic Sets with Applications in Multi-Criteria Group Decision Making Problems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-20, March.
    3. Mi Jung Son & Jin Han Park & Ka Hyun Ko, 2019. "Some Hesitant Fuzzy Hamacher Power-Aggregation Operators for Multiple-Attribute Decision-Making," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-33, July.
    4. Qasim Noor & Tabasam Rashid & Syed Muhammad Husnine, 2021. "An extended TDM method under probabilistic interval-valued hesitant fuzzy environment for stock selection," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(5), pages 1-24, May.
    5. Soniya Gupta & Dheeraj Kumar Joshi, 2025. "Series of novel score functions for Hesitant Bifuzzy set and its application in transportation problem," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 16(8), pages 2785-2799, August.
    6. Meinard, Y. & Tsoukiàs, A., 2019. "On the rationality of decision aiding processes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(3), pages 1074-1084.
    7. Kelin Luo & Yinfeng Xu & Bowen Zhang & Huili Zhang, 2018. "Creating an acceptable consensus ranking for group decision making," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 307-328, July.
    8. Chunqiao Tan & Xiaohong Chen, 2016. "Generalized Archimedean Intuitionistic Fuzzy Averaging Aggregation Operators and their Application to Multicriteria Decision-Making," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(02), pages 311-352, March.
    9. Zhu, Bin & Xu, Zeshui & Zhang, Ren & Hong, Mei, 2015. "Generalized analytic network process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(1), pages 277-288.
    10. Huiping Chen & Guiqiong Xu & Pingle Yang, 2019. "Multi-Attribute Decision-Making Approach Based on Dual Hesitant Fuzzy Information Measures and Their Applications," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-18, August.
    11. Shouzhen Zeng & Jianping Chen & Xingsen Li, 2016. "A Hybrid Method for Pythagorean Fuzzy Multiple-Criteria Decision Making," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(02), pages 403-422, March.
    12. Arunodaya Raj Mishra & Pratibha Rani & Raghunathan Krishankumar & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Fausto Cavallaro & Kattur S. Ravichandran, 2021. "A Hesitant Fuzzy Combined Compromise Solution Framework-Based on Discrimination Measure for Ranking Sustainable Third-Party Reverse Logistic Providers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-24, February.
    13. Peláez, José Ignacio & Bernal, Rubén, 2016. "Selective majority additive ordered weighting averaging operatorAuthor-Name: Karanik, Marcelo," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(3), pages 816-826.
    14. Qin, Quande & Liang, Fuqi & Li, Li & Wei, Yi-Ming, 2017. "Selection of energy performance contracting business models: A behavioral decision-making approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 422-433.
    15. Xun Zhang & Jun Wang, 2023. "Q‐Rung Interval‐Valued Probabilistic Dual Hesitant Fuzzy Sets: A New Tool for Multiattribute Group Decision‐Making," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2023(1).
    16. Gitinavard, Hossein & Mousavi, S. Meysam & Vahdani, Behnam, 2017. "Soft computing based on hierarchical evaluation approach and criteria interdependencies for energy decision-making problems: A case study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 556-577.
    17. Mohsen Ahmadi, 2021. "A Computational Approach to Uncovering Economic Growth Factors," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 58(4), pages 1051-1076, December.
    18. Liu, Bingsheng & Shen, Yinghua & Zhang, Wei & Chen, Xiaohong & Wang, Xueqing, 2015. "An interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy principal component analysis model-based method for complex multi-attribute large-group decision-making," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(1), pages 209-225.
    19. Pavle Milošević & Bratislav Petrović & Ivana Dragović, 2021. "A Novel Approach to Generalized Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets Based on Interpolative Boolean Algebra," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(17), pages 1-21, September.
    20. Barcus, Ana & Montibeller, Gilberto, 2008. "Supporting the allocation of software development work in distributed teams with multi-criteria decision analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 464-475, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:jossai:v:7:y:2019:i:1:p:70-89:n:5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyterbrill.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.