IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/erjour/v4y2013i1p137-146n6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

New Frontiers of the Innovation Economy and Education

Author

Listed:
  • Schulman Stuart A.

    (Loomba Department of Management, Bernard M. Baruch College, The City University of New York (CUNY), New York, NY 10010, USA)

  • Lyons Thomas S.

    (Loomba Department of Management, Bernard M. Baruch College, The City University of New York (CUNY), New York, NY 10010, USA)

Abstract

The global recession of 2008 has created lingering economic uncertainty and the necessity for innovative thinking and action. Workforce development, with its focus on massification and replication needs to incorporate entrepreneurial innovation and development to scale while disruptive innovation provides the stimulus that animates and drives the model. Education at the university level, entrepreneurship education in particular, needs to examine both new models and new types of students, because acting entrepreneurially is not just for entrepreneurs but for everybody. The model presented in this commentary is an attempt to focus on the processes and linkages between the various “actors” that define the disparate relationships and opportunities described in this commentary.Historically, entrepreneurship and workforce development have been viewed as separate, often conflicting priorities, frequently competing for scarce resources in the landscape of economic development. Although both entrepreneurship and workforce development bring resources and add value to the community economy and share common roots in education and training, there has been little current research that examines how they can be leveraged together to provide new models for economic development and innovation that accelerate growth, while providing for a vibrant economic future for our communities and nation via well-educated, nascent entrepreneurs.

Suggested Citation

  • Schulman Stuart A. & Lyons Thomas S., 2013. "New Frontiers of the Innovation Economy and Education," Entrepreneurship Research Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 4(1), pages 137-146, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:erjour:v:4:y:2013:i:1:p:137-146:n:6
    DOI: 10.1515/erj-2013-0075
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/erj-2013-0075
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/erj-2013-0075?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Edward J. Malecki, 2011. "Connecting local entrepreneurial ecosystems to global innovation networks: open innovation, double networks and knowledge integration," International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 14(1), pages 36-59.
    2. Roland Andersson & John M. Quigley & Mats Wilhelmson, 2004. "University decentralization as regional policy: the Swedish experiment," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 4(4), pages 371-388, August.
    3. Gregg A. Lichtenstein & Thomas S. Lyons, 2001. "The Entrepreneurial Development System: Transforming Business Talent and Community Economies," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 15(1), pages 3-20, February.
    4. Robert P. Giloth, 2000. "Learning from the Field: Economic Growth and Workforce Development in the 1990s," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 14(4), pages 340-359, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:rri:wpaper:200902 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Kazuyuki MOTOHASHI & Qiuhan ZHAO, 2023. "University as a Knowledge Source of Innovation: A spatial analysis of the impact on local high-tech startup creation," Discussion papers 23027, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    3. Bo Yuan & Kecen Jing & Yuhai Liu, 2024. "From agglomeration to dispersion: How does China's noncapital functions' relief affect regional development?," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(3), pages 595-620, June.
    4. Xaver Neumeyer & Susana C. Santos & Michael H. Morris, 2019. "Who is left out: exploring social boundaries in entrepreneurial ecosystems," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 44(2), pages 462-484, April.
    5. Donald F. Kuratko & Greg Fisher & James M. Bloodgood & Jeffrey S. Hornsby, 2017. "The paradox of new venture legitimation within an entrepreneurial ecosystem," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 119-140, June.
    6. Arenal, Alberto & Armuña, Cristina & Feijoo, Claudio & Ramos, Sergio & Xu, Zimu & Moreno, Ana, 2020. "Innovation ecosystems theory revisited: The case of artificial intelligence in China," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(6).
    7. Rocha, Augusto & Brown, Ross & Mawson, Suzanne, 2021. "Capturing conversations in entrepreneurial ecosystems," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(9).
    8. Muhammad Salman Shabbir, 2025. "Exploring link between skills, attitudes, and intentions in information technology industry: a study on entrepreneurial mindset," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    9. Chris Phelan & Richard Sharpley, 2012. "Exploring entrepreneurial skills and competencies in farm tourism," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 27(2), pages 103-118, March.
    10. Tasso Brandt & Torben Schubert, 2014. "Is the university model an organizational necessity? Scale and agglomeration effects in science," Chapters, in: Andrea Bonaccorsi (ed.), Knowledge, Diversity and Performance in European Higher Education, chapter 8, pages iii-iii, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    11. Elena B. Dvoryadkina & Elena G. Efimova, 2019. "The spatial aspect of regional policy in the field of the vocational education system development," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 10(6), pages 28-41, December.
    12. repec:rri:wpaper:200904 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Giulia Faggio & Teresa Schlüter & Philipp vom Berge, 2018. "Interaction of Public and Private Employment: Evidence from a German Government Move," SERC Discussion Papers 0229, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    14. Tasso Brandt & Torben Schubert, 2013. "Is the university model an organizational necessity? Scale and agglomeration effects in science," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 94(2), pages 541-565, February.
    15. Mark D. Partridge & M. Rose Olfert, 2011. "The Winners' Choice: Sustainable Economic Strategies for Successful 21st-Century Regions," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 33(2), pages 143-178.
    16. Neumark, David & Simpson, Helen, 2015. "Place-Based Policies," Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, in: Gilles Duranton & J. V. Henderson & William C. Strange (ed.), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, edition 1, volume 5, chapter 0, pages 1197-1287, Elsevier.
    17. Michaela Trippl & Tanja Sinozic & Helen Lawton Smith, 2015. "The Role of Universities in Regional Development: Conceptual Models and Policy Institutions in the UK, Sweden and Austria," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(9), pages 1722-1740, September.
    18. Seo, Seongmin & Kwak, Do Won, 2024. "The impact of the innovation city project on the local economy: Evidence from Korean Innovation City Project from 2012 to 2014," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    19. Barkley, David L. & Henry, Mark S. & Lee, DooHee, 2006. "Innovative Activity in Rural Areas: The Role of Local and Regional Characteristics," REDRL Research Reports 113802, Clemson University, Regional Economic Development Research Laboratory (REDRL).
    20. Massimiliano Bratti & Luca Benedictis & Gianluca Santoni, 2014. "On the pro-trade effects of immigrants," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 150(3), pages 557-594, August.
    21. Erik Stam & Andrew Ven, 2021. "Entrepreneurial ecosystem elements," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 56(2), pages 809-832, February.
    22. Faggio, Giulia, 2019. "Relocation of public sector workers: Evaluating a place-based policy," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 53-75.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:erjour:v:4:y:2013:i:1:p:137-146:n:6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.