IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/causin/v8y2020i1p229-248n6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A note on a sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding, and the related E-value

Author

Listed:
  • Sjölander Arvid

    (Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institute, Solna, Sweden)

Abstract

Unmeasured confounding is one of the most important threats to the validity of observational studies. In this paper we scrutinize a recently proposed sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding. The analysis requires specification of two parameters, loosely defined as the maximal strength of association that an unmeasured confounder may have with the exposure and with the outcome, respectively. The E-value is defined as the strength of association that the confounder must have with the exposure and the outcome, to fully explain away an observed exposure-outcome association. We derive the feasible region of the sensitivity analysis parameters, and we show that the bounds produced by the sensitivity analysis are not always sharp. We finally establish a region in which the bounds are guaranteed to be sharp, and we discuss the implications of this sharp region for the interpretation of the E-value. We illustrate the theory with a real data example and a simulation.

Suggested Citation

  • Sjölander Arvid, 2020. "A note on a sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding, and the related E-value," Journal of Causal Inference, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 229-248, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:causin:v:8:y:2020:i:1:p:229-248:n:6
    DOI: 10.1515/jci-2020-0012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/jci-2020-0012
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/jci-2020-0012?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Keisuke Hirano & Jack R. Porter, 2012. "Impossibility Results for Nondifferentiable Functionals," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 80(4), pages 1769-1790, July.
    2. Zhihong Cai & Manabu Kuroki & Judea Pearl & Jin Tian, 2008. "Bounds on Direct Effects in the Presence of Confounded Intermediate Variables," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 64(3), pages 695-701, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sjölander Arvid, 2020. "A note on a sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding, and the related E-value," Journal of Causal Inference, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 229-248, January.
    2. Ting Ye & Luke Keele & Raiden Hasegawa & Dylan S. Small, 2020. "A Negative Correlation Strategy for Bracketing in Difference-in-Differences," Papers 2006.02423, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2022.
    3. Jiannan Lu & Peng Ding & Tirthankar Dasgupta, 2018. "Treatment Effects on Ordinal Outcomes: Causal Estimands and Sharp Bounds," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 43(5), pages 540-567, October.
    4. Hiroaki Kaido & Francesca Molinari & Jörg Stoye, 2019. "Confidence Intervals for Projections of Partially Identified Parameters," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 87(4), pages 1397-1432, July.
    5. Chiba Yasutaka & Taguri Masataka, 2013. "Alternative Monotonicity Assumptions for Improving Bounds on Natural Direct Effects," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 9(2), pages 235-249, July.
    6. Vikesh Amin & Jere R. Behrman & Jason M. Fletcher & Carlos A. Flores & Alfonso Flores-Lagunes & Hans-Peter Kohler, 2022. "Does Schooling Improve Cognitive Abilities at Older Ages: Causal Evidence from Nonparametric Bounds," PIER Working Paper Archive 22-016, Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania.
    7. Victor Chernozhukov & Christian Hansen & Yuan Liao, 2015. "A lava attack on the recovery of sums of dense and sparse signals," CeMMAP working papers CWP56/15, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    8. Joachim Freyberger & Bradley J. Larsen, 2025. "How Well Does Bargaining Work in Consumer Markets? A Robust Bounds Approach," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 93(1), pages 161-194, January.
    9. Kitagawa, Toru & Montiel Olea, José Luis & Payne, Jonathan & Velez, Amilcar, 2020. "Posterior distribution of nondifferentiable functions," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 217(1), pages 161-175.
    10. François Gerard & Miikka Rokkanen & Christoph Rothe, 2020. "Bounds on treatment effects in regression discontinuity designs with a manipulated running variable," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 11(3), pages 839-870, July.
    11. Lorenzo Almada & Ian McCarthy & Rusty Tchernis, 2016. "What Can We Learn about the Effects of Food Stamps on Obesity in the Presence of Misreporting?," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 98(4), pages 997-1017.
    12. Isaiah Andrews & Timothy B. Armstrong, 2017. "Unbiased instrumental variables estimation under known first‐stage sign," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 8(2), pages 479-503, July.
    13. Lafférs, Lukáš & Mellace, Giovanni, 2020. "Identification of the average treatment effect when SUTVA is violated," Discussion Papers on Economics 3/2020, University of Southern Denmark, Department of Economics.
    14. Jiannan Lu & Yunshu Zhang & Peng Ding, 2020. "Sharp bounds on the relative treatment effect for ordinal outcomes," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 76(2), pages 664-669, June.
    15. Hiroaki Kaido & Yi Zhang, 2019. "Robust Likelihood Ratio Tests for Incomplete Economic Models," Papers 1910.04610, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2019.
    16. Gerard, François & Rothe, Christoph & Rokkanen, Miikka, 2016. "Bounds on Treatment Effects in Regression Discontinuity Designs under Manipulation of the Running Variable, with an Application," CEPR Discussion Papers 11668, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    17. Manabu Kuroki & Takahiro Hayashi, 2016. "On the Estimation Accuracy of Causal Effects using Supplementary Variables," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 43(2), pages 505-519, June.
    18. Donald W.K. Andrews, 2011. "Similar-on-the-Boundary Tests for Moment Inequalities Exist, But Have Poor Power," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 1815R, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University, revised Mar 2012.
    19. Hiroaki Kaido & Yi Zhang, 2023. "Applications of Choquet expected utility to hypothesis testing with incompleteness," The Japanese Economic Review, Springer, vol. 74(4), pages 551-572, October.
    20. Amin, Vikesh & Flores, Carlos A. & Flores-Lagunes, Alfonso & Parisian, Daniel J., 2016. "The effect of degree attainment on arrests: Evidence from a randomized social experiment," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 259-273.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:causin:v:8:y:2020:i:1:p:229-248:n:6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyterbrill.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.