IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/causin/v1y2013i1p51-82n7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Revisiting a Discrepant Result: A Propensity Score Analysis, the Paired Availability Design for Historical Controls, and a Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

Author

Listed:
  • G. Baker Stuart

    (National Cancer Institute)

  • S. Lindeman Karen

    (Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions)

Abstract

There is an ongoing controversy over whether epidural analgesia for women in labor increases the probability of Caesarean section. Previous research compared results from three methods for estimating the effect of epidural analgesia on the probability of Caesarean section: a propensity score analysis, the paired availability design for historical controls, and meta-analysis of randomized trials. The propensity score analysis and a paired availability design gave substantially different results with the latter in closer agreement with results of a meta-analysis of randomized trials. We updated this investigation in three ways. First, we discussed the use of causal graphs for variable selection in the propensity score analysis. Second, we introduced new extrapolation estimates to improve generalizability for the paired availability design and the meta-analysis of randomized trials with crossovers. Third, we included the results from more recent studies. This analysis provides a window into various topics in causal inference and comparative effectiveness research.

Suggested Citation

  • G. Baker Stuart & S. Lindeman Karen, 2013. "Revisiting a Discrepant Result: A Propensity Score Analysis, the Paired Availability Design for Historical Controls, and a Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials," Journal of Causal Inference, De Gruyter, vol. 1(1), pages 51-82, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:causin:v:1:y:2013:i:1:p:51-82:n:7
    DOI: 10.1515/jci-2013-0005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/jci-2013-0005
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/jci-2013-0005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Akaike, Hirotugu, 1981. "Likelihood of a model and information criteria," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 3-14, May.
    2. Imbens, Guido W & Angrist, Joshua D, 1994. "Identification and Estimation of Local Average Treatment Effects," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 62(2), pages 467-475, March.
    3. Jing Cheng, 2009. "Estimation and Inference for the Causal Effect of Receiving Treatment on a Multinomial Outcome," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 65(1), pages 96-103, March.
    4. Constantine E. Frangakis & Donald B. Rubin, 2002. "Principal Stratification in Causal Inference," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 58(1), pages 21-29, March.
    5. Dean A. Follmann & Michael A. Proschan, 1999. "Valid Inference in Random Effects Meta-Analysis," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 55(3), pages 732-737, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrea Mercatanti & Fan Li, 2017. "Do debit cards decrease cash demand?: causal inference and sensitivity analysis using principal stratification," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 66(4), pages 759-776, August.
    2. Huber, Martin & Meier, Jonas & Wallimann, Hannes, 2022. "Business analytics meets artificial intelligence: Assessing the demand effects of discounts on Swiss train tickets," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 22-39.
    3. Neil Christy & Amanda Ellen Kowalski, 2024. "Counting Defiers in Health Care: A Design-Based Model of an Experiment Can Reveal Evidence Against Monotonicity," Papers 2412.16352, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2025.
    4. Simon Calmar Andersen & Louise Beuchert & Phillip Heiler & Helena Skyt Nielsen, 2023. "A Guide to Impact Evaluation under Sample Selection and Missing Data: Teacher's Aides and Adolescent Mental Health," Papers 2308.04963, arXiv.org.
    5. James J. Heckman & Rodrigo Pinto, 2018. "Unordered Monotonicity," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 86(1), pages 1-35, January.
    6. Weili Ding & Steven F. Lehrer, 2010. "Estimating Treatment Effects from Contaminated Multiperiod Education Experiments: The Dynamic Impacts of Class Size Reductions," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 92(1), pages 31-42, February.
    7. Eva Deuchert & Martin Huber & Mark Schelker, 2019. "Direct and Indirect Effects Based on Difference-in-Differences With an Application to Political Preferences Following the Vietnam Draft Lottery," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(4), pages 710-720, October.
    8. Carlos A. Flores & Alfonso Flores-Lagunes, 2007. "Identification and Estimation of Casual Mechanisms and Net Effects of a Treatment," Working Papers 0706, University of Miami, Department of Economics.
    9. Deuchert, Eva & Eugster, Beatrix, 2019. "Income and substitution effects of a disability insurance reform," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 1-14.
    10. Bia, Michela & Flores-Lagunes, Alfonso & Mercatanti, Andrea, 2018. "Evaluation of Language Training Programs in Luxembourg using Principal Stratification," GLO Discussion Paper Series 289, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    11. Vira Semenova, 2020. "Generalized Lee Bounds," Papers 2008.12720, arXiv.org, revised May 2025.
    12. Baker Stuart G & Lindeman Karen S & Kramer Barnett S, 2011. "Clarifying the Role of Principal Stratification in the Paired Availability Design," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 7(1), pages 1-11, May.
    13. Stuart G. Baker & Daniel J. Sargent & Marc Buyse & Tomasz Burzykowski, 2012. "Predicting Treatment Effect from Surrogate Endpoints and Historical Trials: An Extrapolation Involving Probabilities of a Binary Outcome or Survival to a Specific Time," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 68(1), pages 248-257, March.
    14. Kédagni, Désiré, 2023. "Identifying treatment effects in the presence of confounded types," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 234(2), pages 479-511.
    15. Masayuki Sawada, 2019. "Noncompliance in randomized control trials without exclusion restrictions," Papers 1910.03204, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2021.
    16. Huber, Martin & Steinmayr, Andreas, 2017. "A Framework for Separating Individual Treatment Effects From Spillover, Interaction, and General Equilibrium Effects," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 21, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
    17. Patrick Kline & Christopher R. Walters, 2016. "Evaluating Public Programs with Close Substitutes: The Case of HeadStart," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 131(4), pages 1795-1848.
    18. Heckman, James & Pinto, Rodrigo, 2024. "Econometric causality: The central role of thought experiments," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 243(1).
    19. Martijn van Hasselt & Timothy Ferland & Jeremy Bray & Arnie Aldridge, 2017. "Bayesian Estimation of the Complier Average Casual Effect," UNCG Economics Working Papers 17-14, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Department of Economics.
    20. Michela Bia & German Blanco & Marie Valentova, 2021. "The Causal Impact of Taking Parental Leave on Wages: Evidence from 2005 to 2015," LISER Working Paper Series 2021-08, Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LISER).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:causin:v:1:y:2013:i:1:p:51-82:n:7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyterbrill.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.