IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/ajlecn/v1y2010i2n4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The European Company (SE): Practical Failure or Model for Other Supranational Company Types?

Author

Listed:
  • Schmidt Jessica

    (Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena)

Abstract

Since 2004, European undertakings have had the possibility to opt for a supranational type of company: The "European Company" or "Societas Europaea" (SE). A considerable - though overall not huge - number of enterprises have already availed themselves of this new opportunity, including, inter alia, famous names like the German industry giants Allianz SE, BASF SE, and Porsche Automobil Holding SE or the French reinsurer SCOR SE. The paper will first provide an overview of the salient features of this new supranational "European" type of company. The primary focus will be on the most important advantages (e.g., cross-border transfer of seat and restructuring, flexibility with respect to internal structure, "European corporate identity") and disadvantages (e.g., rather complex legal framework, no special tax provisions) of using this supranational corporate vehicle, both from a legal and an economic point of view and illustrating the respective aspects by way of examples from the practical experience gained with the SE so far. Based on this, the paper will then examine whether the SE has really turned out to be the "practical failure" that many predicted or whether it could actually serve as a model for other supranational company types ? not only on the European level, but also on a wider international or even global level, especially for Asian countries as well.

Suggested Citation

  • Schmidt Jessica, 2010. "The European Company (SE): Practical Failure or Model for Other Supranational Company Types?," Asian Journal of Law and Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 1(2), pages 1-24, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:ajlecn:v:1:y:2010:i:2:n:4
    DOI: 10.2202/2154-4611.1008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2202/2154-4611.1008
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2202/2154-4611.1008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Doralt Maria, 2007. "Cross-Border Mergers – A Glimpse into the Future," European Company and Financial Law Review, De Gruyter, vol. 4(1), pages 17-42, April.
    2. Hopt Klaus J. & Leyens Patrick C., 2004. "Board Models in Europe – Recent Developments of Internal Corporate Governance Structures in Germany, the United Kingdom, France, and Italy," European Company and Financial Law Review, De Gruyter, vol. 1(2), pages 135-168, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robert Boyer, 2005. "What future for codetermination and corporate governance in Germany?," PSE Working Papers halshs-00590710, HAL.
    2. Ichiro Iwasaki, 2013. "Firm-Level Determinants of Board System Choice: Evidence from Russia," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Association for Comparative Economic Studies, vol. 55(4), pages 636-671, December.
    3. International Monetary Fund, 2008. "Germany: Selected Issues," IMF Staff Country Reports 2008/081, International Monetary Fund.
    4. Iwasaki, Ichiro, 2011. "Executive Board: The Russian Experience," RRC Working Paper Series 32, Russian Research Center, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    5. Robert Boyer, 2005. "What future for codetermination and corporate governance in Germany?," Working Papers halshs-00590710, HAL.
    6. David Hillier & Julio Pindado & Valdoceu de Queiroz & Chabela de la Torre, 2011. "The impact of country-level corporate governance on research and development," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 42(1), pages 76-98, January.
    7. Kim, Kenneth A. & Kitsabunnarat-Chatjuthamard, P. & Nofsinger, John R., 2007. "Large shareholders, board independence, and minority shareholder rights: Evidence from Europe," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 13(5), pages 859-880, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:ajlecn:v:1:y:2010:i:2:n:4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.