IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/boh/actaub/v14y2011i2p19-28.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamics of sectoral contributions to productivity development in context of business cycle
[Dynamika Přínosů Sektorů Národního Hospodářství K Vývoji Produktivity Při Zohlednění Hospodářského Cyklu]

Author

Listed:
  • Martina Novotná

    (University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice)

  • Tomáš Volek

    (University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice)

Abstract

The main aim of this paper is to analyse sectoral contributions to dynamics productivity and output development in context of business cycle. Used dates were Czech Republic behind years 1995-2009 (15 years). The main used indicators were labour productivity and capital productivity. The analysis has showed, that dynamics changes in growth rate of productivity has clear link to business cycle. Dynamic changes of growth rate labour and capital productivity in the context of business cycle is influence primarily by secondary sector (industry) and tertiary sector (private services). On the contrary, quaternary sector (public services) and quinary sector (developing services) have no significant relation to growth rate of productivity and business cycle. The growth rate of labour or capital productivity are not influenced by changes in structure of employment or investment.

Suggested Citation

  • Martina Novotná & Tomáš Volek, 2011. "Dynamics of sectoral contributions to productivity development in context of business cycle [Dynamika Přínosů Sektorů Národního Hospodářství K Vývoji Produktivity Při Zohlednění Hospodářského Cyklu," Acta Universitatis Bohemiae Meridionalis, University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Faculty of Economics, vol. 14(2), pages 19-28.
    • Handle: RePEc:boh:actaub:v:14:y:2011:i:2:p:19-28
    DOI: 10.32725/acta.2011.019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://acta.ef.jcu.cz/doi/10.32725/acta.2011.019.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://acta.ef.jcu.cz/doi/10.32725/acta.2011.019.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.32725/acta.2011.019?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Scott Atkinson & Claudia Halabí, 2005. "Economic Efficiency and Productivity Growth in the Post-Privatization Chilean Hydroelectric Industry," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 245-273, May.
    2. Tomáš Volek & Martina Novotná, 2010. "Development of sectoral productivity in context of output fluctuation [Vývoj Sektorové Produktivity V Souvislosti S Fluktuací Výstupu]," Acta Universitatis Bohemiae Meridionalis, University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Faculty of Economics, vol. 13(3), pages 65-71.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Diaconu, Oana & Oprescu, Gheorghe & Pittman, Russell, 2009. "Electricity reform in Romania," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 114-124, March.
    2. Cesaroni, Giovanni & Kerstens, Kristiaan & Van de Woestyne, Ignace, 2019. "Short- and long-run plant capacity notions: Definitions and comparison," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(1), pages 387-397.
    3. Kerstens, Kristiaan & O’Donnell, Christopher & Van de Woestyne, Ignace, 2019. "Metatechnology frontier and convexity: A restatement," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(2), pages 780-792.
    4. See, Kok Fong & Coelli, Tim, 2014. "Total factor productivity analysis of a single vertically integrated electricity utility in Malaysia using a Törnqvist index method," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 62-72.
    5. See, Kok Fong & Coelli, Tim, 2012. "An analysis of factors that influence the technical efficiency of Malaysian thermal power plants," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 677-685.
    6. See, Kok Fong & Coelli, Tim, 2013. "Estimating and decomposing productivity growth of the electricity generation industry in Malaysia: A stochastic frontier analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 207-214.
    7. Seifert, Stefan, 2015. "Productivity Growth and its Sources - A StoNED Metafrontier Analyis of the German Electricity Generating Sector," VfS Annual Conference 2015 (Muenster): Economic Development - Theory and Policy 112975, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    8. Tim Coelli & Gholamreza Hajargasht & C.A. Knox Lovell, 2008. "Econometric Estimation of an Input Distance Function in a System of Equations," CEPA Working Papers Series WP012008, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
    9. Jin, Qianying & Kerstens, Kristiaan & Van de Woestyne, Ignace, 2020. "Metafrontier productivity indices: Questioning the common convexification strategy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(2), pages 737-747.
    10. Pittman, Russell, 2007. "Restructuring the Russian electricity sector: Re-creating California?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 1872-1883, March.
    11. Russell Pittman & Vanessa Yanhua Zhang, 2008. "Electricity Restructuring in China: The Elusive Quest for Competition," EAG Discussions Papers 200805, Department of Justice, Antitrust Division.
    12. Kok Fong See & Tim Coelli, 2009. "The Effects of Competition Policy on TFP Growth: Some Evidence from the Malaysian Electricity Supply Industry," CEPA Working Papers Series WP062009, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
    13. Cesaroni, Giovanni & Giovannola, Daniele, 2015. "Average-cost efficiency and optimal scale sizes in non-parametric analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(1), pages 121-133.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:boh:actaub:v:14:y:2011:i:2:p:19-28. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/efjcucz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.