IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/boh/actaub/v13y2010i2p93-104.html

Application of fuzzy multicriteria decision making on the factors of corporate culture
[Využití Fuzzy Vícekriteriálního Rozhodování Pro Hodnocení Faktorů Podnikové Kultury]

Author

Listed:
  • Martin Pech

    (University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice)

Abstract

The paper deals with application of fuzzy AHP method in multicriteria decision making. The decision on the final goal is made considering the weights of criteria and alternatives. Application of fuzzy AHP was demonstrated on selecting process of the most significant factors of corporate culture based on Denison's model of corporate culture and determination of its weights. The described weights are depending on expert's assessments, which may vary depending on different experiences and priorities. In order to overcome this problem, some researchers and authors made the Saaty's AHP modified and fuzzified to formulate and control the uncertainty. It was used linguistic weights and the assessments are away from certainty. In the analysis under imprecision judgements, the criteria weights are presented as triangular fuzzy numbers to get more reasonable and realistic solutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin Pech, 2010. "Application of fuzzy multicriteria decision making on the factors of corporate culture [Využití Fuzzy Vícekriteriálního Rozhodování Pro Hodnocení Faktorů Podnikové Kultury]," Acta Universitatis Bohemiae Meridionalis, University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Faculty of Economics, vol. 13(2), pages 93-104.
    • Handle: RePEc:boh:actaub:v:13:y:2010:i:2:p:93-104
    DOI: 10.32725/acta.2010.024
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://acta.ef.jcu.cz/doi/10.32725/acta.2010.024.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://acta.ef.jcu.cz/doi/10.32725/acta.2010.024.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.32725/acta.2010.024?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sheu, Jiuh-Biing, 2004. "A hybrid fuzzy-based approach for identifying global logistics strategies," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 39-61, January.
    2. Kahraman, Cengiz & Cebeci, Ufuk & Ruan, Da, 2004. "Multi-attribute comparison of catering service companies using fuzzy AHP: The case of Turkey," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(2), pages 171-184, January.
    3. Pi-Fang Hsu & Bi-Yu Chen, 2007. "Developing and Implementing a Selection Model for Bedding Chain Retail Store Franchisee Using Delphi and Fuzzy AHP," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 41(2), pages 275-290, April.
    4. Leung, L. C. & Cao, D., 2000. "On consistency and ranking of alternatives in fuzzy AHP," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(1), pages 102-113, July.
    5. Buckley, James J. & Feuring, Thomas & Hayashi, Yoichi, 2001. "Fuzzy hierarchical analysis revisited," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(1), pages 48-64, February.
    6. Cheng-Ru Wu & Che-Wei Chang & Hung-Lung Lin, 2008. "FAHP Sensitivity Analysis for Measurement Nonprofit Organizational Performance," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 42(3), pages 283-302, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Heo, Eunnyeong & Kim, Jinsoo & Boo, Kyung-Jin, 2010. "Analysis of the assessment factors for renewable energy dissemination program evaluation using fuzzy AHP," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(8), pages 2214-2220, October.
    2. Tolga Kaynak & Münevver Gizem Gümüş, 2025. "Biogas potential estimation and geospatial decision-making: a hybrid MCDA approach to optimizing biogas facility locations," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(5), pages 12193-12232, May.
    3. Zhü, Kèyù, 2014. "Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process: Fallacy of the popular methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 236(1), pages 209-217.
    4. Kahraman, Cengiz & Ertay, Tijen & Buyukozkan, Gulcin, 2006. "A fuzzy optimization model for QFD planning process using analytic network approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 171(2), pages 390-411, June.
    5. Shang, Delei & Yin, Guangzhi & Li, Xiaoshuang & Li, Yaoji & Jiang, Changbao & Kang, Xiangtao & Liu, Chao & Zhang, Chi, 2015. "Analysis for Green Mine (phosphate) performance of China: An evaluation index system," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(P2), pages 71-84.
    6. Talinli, Ilhan & Topuz, Emel & Uygar Akbay, Mehmet, 2010. "Comparative analysis for energy production processes (EPPs): Sustainable energy futures for Turkey," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(8), pages 4479-4488, August.
    7. Özgür Kabak & Da Ruan, 2011. "A comparison study of fuzzy MADM methods in nuclear safeguards evaluation," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 209-226, October.
    8. María Carmen Carnero, 2015. "Auditing model for the introduction of computerised maintenance management system," International Journal of Data Science, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(1), pages 17-41.
    9. Seung-Jin Han & Won-Jae Lee & So-Hee Kim & Sang-Hoon Yoon & Hyunwoong Pyun, 2022. "Assessing Expected Long-term Benefits for the Olympic Games: Delphi-AHP Approach from Korean Olympic Experts," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, December.
    10. Irina Vinogradova-Zinkevič, 2023. "Comparative Sensitivity Analysis of Some Fuzzy AHP Methods," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-41, December.
    11. Mikhailov, L., 2004. "A fuzzy approach to deriving priorities from interval pairwise comparison judgements," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 159(3), pages 687-704, December.
    12. Hala A. Effat & Ahmed El-Zeiny & M. Sowilem & K. Mansour & Khaled Elwan, 2024. "Geospatial modeling for planning an optimum and least-cost route to link three historical sites in El-Fayoum desert, Egypt," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(11), pages 27765-27785, November.
    13. Gaurav Khatwani & Gopal Das, 2016. "Evaluating combination of individual pre-purchase internet information channels using hybrid fuzzy MCDM technique: demographics as moderators," International Journal of Indian Culture and Business Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(1), pages 28-49.
    14. Dinulescu Ruxandra & Dobrin Cosmin, 2022. "Applying the fuzzy analytical hierarchy process for classifying and prioritizing healthcare quality attributes," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 17(1), pages 15-40, March.
    15. Parida Jewpanya & Pinit Nuangpirom & Warisa Nakkiew & Siwasit Pitjamit & Pakpoom Jaichomphu, 2025. "Optimizing Tourist Destination Selection Using AHP and Fuzzy AHP Based on Individual Preferences for Personalized Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-19, January.
    16. Mohammad Muzahidul Islam & Laizu Akter & A.K.M. Kanak Pervez & Md. Nur Nabi & Md. Momin Uddin & Zakaria Arifin, 2020. "Application of combined SWOT and AHP for strategy development: evidence from pottery industry of Bangladesh," Asian Journal of Agriculture and rural Development, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 10(1), pages 81-94, June.
    17. Keon Chul Park & Dong-Hee Shin, 2017. "Security assessment framework for IoT service," Telecommunication Systems: Modelling, Analysis, Design and Management, Springer, vol. 64(1), pages 193-209, January.
    18. Ngoc Thach Pham & Anh Duc Do & Quang Vinh Nguyen & Van Loi Ta & Thi Thanh Binh Dao & Dieu Linh Ha & Xuan Truong Hoang, 2021. "Research on Knowledge Management Models at Universities Using Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-15, January.
    19. Quadri Noorulhasan Naveed & Mohamed Rafik Noor Qureshi & Nasser Tairan & AbdulHafeez Mohammad & Asadullah Shaikh & Alhuseen O Alsayed & Asadullah Shah & Fahad Mazaed Alotaibi, 2020. "Evaluating critical success factors in implementing E-learning system using multi-criteria decision-making," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-25, May.
    20. Wanke, Peter Fernandes & Chiappetta Jabbour, Charbel José & Moreira Antunes, Jorge Junio & Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, Ana Beatriz & Roubaud, David & Sobreiro, Vinicius Amorim & Santibanez Gonzalez‬, Erne, 2021. "An original information entropy-based quantitative evaluation model for low-carbon operations in an emerging market," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:boh:actaub:v:13:y:2010:i:2:p:93-104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/efjcucz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.