IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/blg/reveco/v73y2021i2p62-80.html

Exploring The Relationship Between Worker S Adaptive Performance And Co-Creation Process In Indonesia S Creative Industry

Author

Listed:
  • NANDINI Widya

    (School of Business and Management)

  • GUSTOMO Aurik

    (School of Business and Management)

  • SUSHANDOYO Dedy

    (School of Business and Management)

Abstract

Today, a new market perspective has emerged that changes the former view through the concept of co-creation. However, the explanation regarding this interaction is still limited. Therefore, this research attempts to examine the interaction between the company and the market thoroughly based on the customers co-creation process in Indonesia s media and application development companies. To achieve those research objectives, we conducted a preliminary study through semi-structured interviews. This study found that the tinkering co-creation process exists in these two sectors of the creative industry. This preliminary study also found that workers adaptive performance is pivotal toward the co-creation process between the company and the customer. Therefore, it demands adaptive workers to have a better approach to product development with their clients. Thus, it is showed that co-creation processes are one of the keys to developing a sustainable competitive advantage for companies.

Suggested Citation

  • NANDINI Widya & GUSTOMO Aurik & SUSHANDOYO Dedy, 2021. "Exploring The Relationship Between Worker S Adaptive Performance And Co-Creation Process In Indonesia S Creative Industry," Revista Economica, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 73(2), pages 62-80, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:blg:reveco:v:73:y:2021:i:2:p:62-80
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://economice.ulbsibiu.ro/revista.economica/archive/73205nandini&gustomo&sushandoyo.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Merita Bernik & Yudi Azis & Dwi Kartini & Budi Harsanto, 2015. "Managing Innovation of SMEs in Creative Industry for Interactive Game Subsector and TV and Radio Subsector Based on Local Wisdom in Development of Competitiveness Business (Case Study SMESs in Bandung)," International Journal of Business and Administrative Studies, Professor Dr. Bahaudin G. Mujtaba, vol. 1(2), pages 49-53.
    2. James G. March, 1991. "Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(1), pages 71-87, February.
    3. Andreas Hein & Jörg Weking & Maximilian Schreieck & Manuel Wiesche & Markus Böhm & Helmut Krcmar, 2019. "Value co-creation practices in business-to-business platform ecosystems," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 29(3), pages 503-518, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lerch, Christian M. & Horvat, Djerdj & Jasny, Johannes, 2024. "When manufacturers turn into digital platform providers: A transformation model to understand the platformization pathway," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    2. Zander, Udo & Lu, Lixin & Chimenti, Gianluca, 2025. "The platform economy and futures of market societies: Salient tensions in ecosystem evolution," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    3. Marlen Gabriele Arnold & Kai Hockerts, 2011. "The greening dutchman: Philips' process of green flagging to drive sustainable innovations," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(6), pages 394-407, September.
    4. Berenguer Contri, Gloria & Gil Saura, Irene & Gil, Roberto & Vallejo Auñón, Luisa & Juma Michilena, Israel Javier, 2024. "ICT and value co-creation in B2B: the new way of loyalty in service," Cuadernos de Gestión, Universidad del País Vasco - Instituto de Economía Aplicada a la Empresa (IEAE).
    5. Hsieh, Chia-Chun & Ma, Zhiming & Novoselov, Kirill E., 2019. "Accounting conservatism, business strategy, and ambiguity," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 41-55.
    6. Xiong, Jiwei & Wang, Tao & Yang, Haibin, 2024. "Innovation search after failure: The role of peers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    7. Arman Avadikyan & Gilles Lambert & Christophe Lerch, 2016. "A Multi-Level Perspective on Ambidexterity: The Case of a Synchrotron Research Facility," Working Papers of BETA 2016-44, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    8. Henri A. Schildt & Markku V.J. Maula & Thomas Keil, 2005. "Explorative and Exploitative Learning from External Corporate Ventures," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 29(4), pages 493-515, July.
    9. Josse Delfgaauw & Otto H. Swank, 2016. "Task‐Specific Human Capital and Organizational Inertia," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(3), pages 608-626, September.
    10. Peixu He & Yana Pei & Chunpei Lin & Di Ye, 2021. "Ambidextrous Marketing Capabilities, Exploratory and Exploitative Market-Based Innovation, and Innovation Performance: An Empirical Study on China’s Manufacturing Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-21, January.
    11. Insoo Cho & Peter F. Orazem, 2021. "How endogenous risk preferences and sample selection affect analysis of firm survival," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 1309-1332, April.
    12. Tomasz Helbin & Amy Van Looy, 2021. "Is Business Process Management (BPM) Ready for Ambidexterity? Conceptualization, Implementation Guidelines and Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-25, February.
    13. Kornberger, Martin & Justesen, Lise & Mouritsen, Jan, 2011. "“When you make manager, we put a big mountain in front of you”: An ethnography of managers in a Big 4 Accounting Firm," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 36(8), pages 514-533.
    14. Morgan Swink & Kejia Hu & Xiande Zhao, 2022. "Analytics applications, limitations, and opportunities in restaurant supply chains," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(10), pages 3710-3726, October.
    15. Son K. Lam & Thomas E. DeCarlo & Ashish Sharma, 2019. "Salesperson ambidexterity in customer engagement: do customer base characteristics matter?," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 659-680, July.
    16. Inseong Song & Jonghoon Bae, 2016. "Politics, strong institution and competitive advantage: an examination of organizational aspiration for competition," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 412-443, December.
    17. Raluca Zoltan & Romulus Vancea, 2022. "Taylorism and Ambidexterity – A Systemic Perspective on Integrating Exploration and Exploitation in Organizations," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(1), pages 768-775, September.
    18. Alan Hevner & Isabelle Comyn-Wattiau & Jacky Akoka & Nicolas Prat, 2018. "A pragmatic approach for identifying and managing design science research goals and evaluation criteria," Post-Print hal-02283783, HAL.
    19. Jonathan H. Reed, 2022. "Operational and strategic change during temporary turbulence: evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 589-608, June.
    20. Felipe A. Csaszar & Nicolaj Siggelkow, 2010. "How Much to Copy? Determinants of Effective Imitation Breadth," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(3), pages 661-676, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
    • M12 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Personnel Management; Executives; Executive Compensation
    • M50 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Personnel Economics - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:blg:reveco:v:73:y:2021:i:2:p:62-80. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eduard Alexandru Stoica (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feulbro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.