IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/stanee/v69y2015i2p171-196.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the inefficiency of the restricted maximum likelihood

Author

Listed:
  • Nicholas T. Longford

Abstract

type="main" xml:id="stan12055-abs-0001"> The restricted maximum likelihood is preferred by many to the full maximum likelihood for estimation with variance component and other random coefficient models, because the variance estimator is unbiased. It is shown that this unbiasedness is accompanied in some balanced designs by an inflation of the mean squared error. An estimator of the cluster-level variance that is uniformly more efficient than the full maximum likelihood is derived. Estimators of the variance ratio are also studied.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicholas T. Longford, 2015. "On the inefficiency of the restricted maximum likelihood," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 69(2), pages 171-196, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:stanee:v:69:y:2015:i:2:p:171-196
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/stan.12055
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kubokawa, T., 1995. "Estimation of Variance Components in Mixed Linear Models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(2), pages 210-236, May.
    2. Stavros Kourouklis, 2012. "A New Estimator of the Variance Based on Minimizing Mean Squared Error," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 66(4), pages 234-236, November.
    3. Ciprian M. Crainiceanu & David Ruppert, 2004. "Likelihood ratio tests in linear mixed models with one variance component," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 66(1), pages 165-185, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Longford Nicholas T., 2021. "Unreported standard errors in meta-analysis," Statistics in Transition New Series, Statistics Poland, vol. 22(4), pages 1-17, December.
    2. Nicholas T. Longford, 2021. "Unreported standard errors in meta-analysis," Statistics in Transition New Series, Polish Statistical Association, vol. 22(4), pages 1-17, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nicholas Longford, 2014. "On the inefficiency of the restricted maximum likelihood," Economics Working Papers 1415, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    2. Benjamin R. Saville & Amy H. Herring, 2009. "Testing Random Effects in the Linear Mixed Model Using Approximate Bayes Factors," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 65(2), pages 369-376, June.
    3. Long Qu & Tobias Guennel & Scott L. Marshall, 2013. "Linear Score Tests for Variance Components in Linear Mixed Models and Applications to Genetic Association Studies," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 69(4), pages 883-892, December.
    4. Zhenzhen Zhang & Thomas M. Braun & Karen E. Peterson & Howard Hu & Martha M. Téllez-Rojo & Brisa N. Sánchez, 2018. "Extending Tests of Random Effects to Assess for Measurement Invariance in Factor Models," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 10(3), pages 634-650, December.
    5. Chen, Haiqiang & Fang, Ying & Li, Yingxing, 2015. "Estimation And Inference For Varying-Coefficient Models With Nonstationary Regressors Using Penalized Splines," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 31(4), pages 753-777, August.
    6. Ferreira, Marco A.R. & Porter, Erica M. & Franck, Christopher T., 2021. "Fast and scalable computations for Gaussian hierarchical models with intrinsic conditional autoregressive spatial random effects," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    7. Philip T. Reiss & R. Todd Ogden, 2010. "Functional Generalized Linear Models with Images as Predictors," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 66(1), pages 61-69, March.
    8. Braun, Julia & Sabanés Bové, Daniel & Held, Leonhard, 2014. "Choice of generalized linear mixed models using predictive crossvalidation," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 190-202.
    9. Andrada Ivanescu & Ana-Maria Staicu & Fabian Scheipl & Sonja Greven, 2015. "Penalized function-on-function regression," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 539-568, June.
    10. Tang, Min & Slud, Eric V. & Pfeiffer, Ruth M., 2014. "Goodness of fit tests for linear mixed models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 176-193.
    11. Sonja Greven & Fabian Scheipl, 2016. "Comment," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 111(516), pages 1568-1573, October.
    12. Kruse, René-Marcel & Silbersdorff, Alexander & Säfken, Benjamin, 2022. "Model averaging for linear mixed models via augmented Lagrangian," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    13. Takumi Saegusa & Chongzhi Di & Ying Qing Chen, 2014. "Hypothesis testing for an extended cox model with time-varying coefficients," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 70(3), pages 619-628, September.
    14. Sumanta Adhya & Tathagata Banerjee & Gaurangadeb Chattopadhyay, 2012. "Inference on finite population categorical response: nonparametric regression-based predictive approach," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 96(1), pages 69-98, January.
    15. Sweeney Elizabeth & Crainiceanu Ciprian & Gertheiss Jan, 2016. "Testing differentially expressed genes in dose-response studies and with ordinal phenotypes," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 15(3), pages 213-235, June.
    16. Xuhua Liu & Xingzhong Xu, 2016. "Confidence distribution inferences in one-way random effects model," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 25(1), pages 59-74, March.
    17. Baey, Charlotte & Cournède, Paul-Henry & Kuhn, Estelle, 2019. "Asymptotic distribution of likelihood ratio test statistics for variance components in nonlinear mixed effects models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 107-122.
    18. Satkartar K. Kinney & David B. Dunson, 2007. "Fixed and Random Effects Selection in Linear and Logistic Models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 63(3), pages 690-698, September.
    19. Gumedze, Freedom N. & Welham, Sue J. & Gogel, Beverley J. & Thompson, Robin, 2010. "A variance shift model for detection of outliers in the linear mixed model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(9), pages 2128-2144, September.
    20. repec:jss:jstsof:43:c01 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Merve Yasemin Tekbudak & Marcela Alfaro-Córdoba & Arnab Maity & Ana-Maria Staicu, 2019. "A comparison of testing methods in scalar-on-function regression," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 103(3), pages 411-436, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:stanee:v:69:y:2015:i:2:p:171-196. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0039-0402 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.