IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/stanee/v59y2005i2p119-158.html

Divisia price and quantity indices: 80 years after

Author

Listed:
  • Bert M. Balk

Abstract

This paper reviews and extends the theory of price and quantity indices which are defined as line integrals, the two types being those of Divisia and Montgomery. The properties of these indices are systematically explored, whereby in particular attention is paid to the path‐(in)dependency issue. Two sections discuss the problem of how to approximate the line integral indices when only data at discrete points of time are available. It appears that every bilateral index can be conceived as the outcome of a line integral index over a particular curve in price–quantity space. The classical position is that chained bilateral indices are rationalized by Divisia indices. This rationalization is only interesting when the Divisia indices themselves possess a proper foundation in economic theory. The final sections are therefore devoted to the role played by the Divisia indices in micro‐economic theory.

Suggested Citation

  • Bert M. Balk, 2005. "Divisia price and quantity indices: 80 years after," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 59(2), pages 119-158, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:stanee:v:59:y:2005:i:2:p:119-158
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9574.2005.00284.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9574.2005.00284.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-9574.2005.00284.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. W. Erwin Diewert, 1980. "Aggregation Problems in the Measurement of Capital," NBER Chapters, in: The Measurement of Capital, pages 433-538, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. W. Erwin Diewert & Robert C. Feenstra, 2021. "Estimating the Benefits of New Products," NBER Chapters, in: Big Data for Twenty-First-Century Economic Statistics, pages 437-473, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Robert C. Feenstra & Christopher R. Knittel, 2009. "Reassessing the US Quality Adjustment to Computer Prices: The Role of Durability and Changing Software," NBER Chapters, in: Price Index Concepts and Measurement, pages 129-160, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Xi Chen & Tatiana Plotnikova, 2018. "The Measurement of Capital: Retrieving Initial Values from Panel Data," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 64(3), pages 542-562, September.
    4. Diewert, W, Erwin & Feenstra, Robert, 2017. "Estimating the Benefits and Costs of New and Disappearing Products," Microeconomics.ca working papers tina_marandola-2017-12, Vancouver School of Economics, revised 19 Dec 2017.
    5. Trajtenberg, Manuel, 1989. "Product Innovations, Price Indices and the (Mis)Measurement of Economic Performance," Foerder Institute for Economic Research Working Papers 275471, Tel-Aviv University > Foerder Institute for Economic Research.
    6. Nicholas Oulton & Gavin Wallis, 2015. "Integrated Estimates of Capital Stocks and Services for the United Kingdom: 1950-2013," CEP Discussion Papers dp1342, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    7. Bernstein, Jeffrey I. & Mamuneas, Theofanis P., 2006. "R&D depreciation, stocks, user costs and productivity growth for US R&D intensive industries," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 70-98, January.
    8. Nicholas Oulton, 2007. "Ex Post Versus Ex Ante Measures Of The User Cost Of Capital," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 53(2), pages 295-317, June.
    9. B. Balk & H. Lorenz & J. Whalley & V. Valli & M. Kräkel, 1999. "Book reviews," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 69(1), pages 96-111, February.
    10. Valentin Zelenyuk, 2024. "Aggregation in efficiency and productivity analysis: a brief review with new insights and justifications for constant returns to scale," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 62(3), pages 321-334, December.
    11. Diewert, Erwin & Fixler, Dennis & Zieschang, Kimberly, 2012. "Problems with the Measurement of Banking Services in a National Accounting Framework," Economics working papers erwin_diewert-2012-14, Vancouver School of Economics, revised 04 Apr 2012.
    12. C. J. O'Donnell, 2012. "Alternative Indexes for Multiple Comparisons of Quantities and Prices," CEPA Working Papers Series WP052012, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
    13. Munisamy, Gopinath & Roe, Terry L., 1995. "General Equilibrium Analysis of Supply and Factor Returns in U.S. Agriculture, 1949-91," Bulletins 7516, University of Minnesota, Economic Development Center.
    14. Catherine J. Morrison Paul & Donald Siegel, 1999. "Estimation of Scale Economies Underlying Growth and Productivity: The Empirical Implications of Data Aggregation," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 65(4), pages 739-756, April.
    15. Linlin Sun & Ruo-en Ren, 2008. "Estimates of China capital input index by industries (1981–2000)," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 3(3), pages 462-481, September.
    16. Christos Pantzios, 2000. "Trade Restrictiveness in the Presence of 'New' Goods," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 93-101, January.
    17. Munisamy Gopinath & Terry L. Roe, 1999. "Modeling inter‐sectoral growth linkages: An application to U.S. agriculture," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 21(2), pages 131-144, October.
    18. W. Erwin Diewert & Koji Nomura & Chihiro Shimizu, 2025. "Estimating flexible functional forms using macroeconomic data," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 69(5), pages 2671-2697, November.
    19. Charles R. Hulten, 2000. "Total Factor Productivity: A Short Biography," NBER Working Papers 7471, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    20. Gopinath, Munisamy & Carver, Jason, 2002. "Total Factor Productivity And Processed Food Trade: A Cross-Country Analysis," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 27(2), pages 1-15, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:stanee:v:59:y:2005:i:2:p:119-158. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0039-0402 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.