IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/srbeha/v30y2013i1p15-30.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Appreciative Inquiry Method—A Suitable Candidate for Action Research?

Author

Listed:
  • Frank Stowell

Abstract

The Appreciative Inquiry method (AIM) is an approach to ‘finding out’ about issues of concern. The method has been used in a variety of situations where the issue to be investigated is well defined and accepted by the stakeholders. We have also found that the method provides a framework for undertaking research in the field or action research. The new researcher undertaking action research can find such an undertaking to be daunting. The dilemma is finding an approach that will enable insight into a situation without the method used distorting its findings. We have found that thinking about the underlying philosophy and the approach to be adopted is a key decision to be made in advance before embarking upon the research. In this paper, we consider the contribution that AIM can make to action research by providing examples of the outcomes of enquiry into several distinctly different areas of interest. Although springing from research ideas about knowledge elicitation, there have been several developments that enhance its capability for enquiry and as a consequence its potential as a method for action research. Since its conception, AIM has been used in a number of projects and developed through several research programmes and has shown its usefulness in supporting the researchers' investigations. This paper provides a summary of the developments with reference to some applications that have contributed to the idea and in moving its application forward. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Frank Stowell, 2013. "The Appreciative Inquiry Method—A Suitable Candidate for Action Research?," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 15-30, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:30:y:2013:i:1:p:15-30
    DOI: 10.1002/sres.2117
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2117
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sres.2117?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Philippe Baumard, 1999. "Tacit Knowledge in Organizations," Post-Print hal-03227234, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Woodfield Paul & Woods Christine & Shepherd Deborah, 2017. "Appreciating Entrepreneurship: A New Approach for Field Research," Entrepreneurship Research Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 7(2), pages 1-17, April.
    2. Frank Stowell, 2022. "The Appreciative Inquiry Method: From knowledge elicitation to organisational inquiry," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(4), pages 765-775, July.
    3. Finisdore, John & Rhodes, Charles & Haines-Young, Roy & Maynard, Simone & Wielgus, Jeffrey & Dvarskas, Anthony & Houdet, Joel & Quétier, Fabien & Lamothe, Karl A. & Ding, Helen & Soulard, François &, 2020. "The 18 benefits of using ecosystem services classification systems," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Frédéric CREPLET, 2004. "Les Portails d’entreprise : une réponse aux dimensions de l’entreprise « processeur de connaissances »," Working Papers of BETA 2004-07, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    2. Starbuck, William H. & Barnett, Michael L. & Baumard, Philippe, 2008. "Payoffs and pitfalls of strategic learning," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 7-21, April.
    3. Tomi Rajala, 2019. "Mind the Information Expectation Gap," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 10(1), pages 104-125, March.
    4. Jamal Shamsie & Michael J. Mannor, 2013. "Looking Inside the Dream Team: Probing Into the Contributions of Tacit Knowledge as an Organizational Resource," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(2), pages 513-529, April.
    5. Jacob Kinoti Nkarichia & Dr. Jepkemboi Choge & Dr. Mwaura Kimani, 2020. "An Asessment Of Influence Of Suspension As Teachers’ Discipline Management Strategy On Kenya Certificate Of Secondary Examination In Public Secondary Schools In Tharaka Nithi County, Kenya," International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 7(9), pages 95-112, September.
    6. Mathias Thoenig & Thierry Verdier, 2010. "A macroeconomic perspective on Knowledge Management," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 33-63, March.
    7. Philippe Baumard, 2009. "An Asymmetric Perspective on Coopetitive Strategies," Post-Print hal-03229117, HAL.
    8. Frédéric CREPLET & Olivier DUPOUET & Francis KERN & Francis MUNIER, 2000. "Tie Organizational and Cognitive Duality of the firm with community concept," Working Papers of BETA 2000-08, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    9. Ian Clarke & William Mackaness & Barbara Ball & Masahide Horita, 2003. "The Devil is in the Detail: Visualising Analogical Thought in Retail Location Decisionmaking," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 30(1), pages 15-36, February.
    10. Matzler, Kurt & Renzl, Birgit & Müller, Julia & Herting, Stephan & Mooradian, Todd A., 2008. "Personality traits and knowledge sharing," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 301-313, June.
    11. Donald Hislop, 2003. "The Complex Relations Between Communities of Practice and the Implementation of Technological Innovations," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 7(02), pages 163-188.
    12. Teresa Carla Oliveira, 2006. "Implicit Logic in Managerial Discourse: A Case Study in Choice of Selection Criteria," Notas Económicas, Faculty of Economics, University of Coimbra, issue 23, pages 53-71, June.
    13. Nasrullah K. Khilji & Stephen A. Roberts, 2015. "An Exploratory Study of Knowledge Management for Enhanced Efficiency and Effectiveness: The Transformation of the Planning System in the UK Local Government," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(01), pages 1-15.
    14. Creplet, F. & Dupouet, O. & Kern, F. & Mehmanpazir, B. & Munier, F., 2001. "Consultants and experts in management consulting firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(9), pages 1517-1535, December.
    15. Daniela Ionescu & Maria Madalina Nita & Marilena Gughea, 2011. "Important Feature Of Organizational Survival -Alliance Between Creativity And Knowledge Management," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 4, pages 91-95, December.
    16. Elliot Bendoly & Anandhi Bharadwaj & Sundar Bharadwaj, 2012. "Complementary Drivers of New Product Development Performance: Cross‐Functional Coordination, Information System Capability, and Intelligence Quality," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 21(4), pages 653-667, July.
    17. Cristiana Parisi, 2013. "The impact of organisational alignment on the effectiveness of firms’ sustainability strategic performance measurement systems: an empirical analysis," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 17(1), pages 71-97, February.
    18. Cohendet, Patrick & Meyer-Krahmer, Frieder, 2001. "The theoretical and policy implications of knowledge codification," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(9), pages 1563-1591, December.
    19. Gotvassli, Kjell-Age, 2008. "Community Knowledge - A Catalyst for Innovation," Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy, Mid-Continent Regional Science Association, vol. 38(2), pages 1-14.
    20. J H Powell & J Swart, 2008. "Scaling knowledge: how does knowledge accrue in systems?," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 59(12), pages 1633-1643, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:30:y:2013:i:1:p:15-30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/1092-7026 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.