IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v104y2023i4p395-405.html

The causal nexus between innovation and economic growth: An OECD study

Author

Listed:
  • Bablu Kumar Dhar
  • Jakhongir Shaturaev
  • Khayrilla Kurbonov
  • Rajabov Nazirjon

Abstract

Objective Innovation contributes to economic growth by generating new ideas and improving production processes. At the same time, countries with high economic growth have the freedom to promote innovation. This article aims to examine the causal relationship between innovation and economic growth. Method An innovation index was constructed using factors of innovation, utilizing principal component analysis. The study used Granger causality to investigate the causal relationship between innovation and economic growth. The sample comprised 34 OECD countries during the period 1961–2018. Results The results showed that the United States had the highest innovation index, while Luxembourg had the highest economic growth. The study found both unidirectional and bidirectional causal relationships between innovation and economic growth. Conclusions The study highlights the importance of innovation in driving economic growth and provides insights into the complex and dynamic relationship between these two variables. The findings could be useful for policymakers in designing effective strategies to promote innovation and foster economic growth in their respective countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Bablu Kumar Dhar & Jakhongir Shaturaev & Khayrilla Kurbonov & Rajabov Nazirjon, 2023. "The causal nexus between innovation and economic growth: An OECD study," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 104(4), pages 395-405, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:104:y:2023:i:4:p:395-405
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.13261
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13261
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.13261?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sunaga, Miho, 2017. "Endogenous growth cycles with financial intermediaries and entrepreneurial innovation," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 191-206.
    2. Eric Staples, 2020. "Innovations in Early Maritime Technology in Mesopotamia and the Arabian Gulf," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 101(7), pages 2539-2554, December.
    3. Galindo, Miguel-Ángel & Méndez, María Teresa, 2014. "Entrepreneurship, economic growth, and innovation: Are feedback effects at work?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(5), pages 825-829.
    4. Robert M. Solow, 1956. "A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 70(1), pages 65-94.
    5. M. Ishaq Nadiri, 1993. "Innovations and Technological Spillovers," NBER Working Papers 4423, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Corey A. DeAngelis & Angela K. Dills, 2020. "Does Compulsory Schooling Affect Innovation? Evidence from the United States," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 101(5), pages 1728-1742, September.
    7. Ioan Radu PETRARIU & Robert BUMBAC & Radu CIOBANU, 2013. "Innovation: a path to competitiveness and economic growth. The case of CEE countries," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 0(5(582)), pages 15-26, May.
    8. Poh Wong & Yuen Ho & Erkko Autio, 2005. "Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Economic Growth: Evidence from GEM data," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 335-350, January.
    9. Farkhod Aminjonov, 2020. "Policy Innovations and Rationale for Sustainable Energy Transition in the UAE," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 101(7), pages 2398-2412, December.
    10. Rudra P. Pradhan & Mak B. Arvin & John H. Hall & Mahendhiran Nair, 2016. "Innovation, financial development and economic growth in Eurozone countries," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(16), pages 1141-1144, November.
    11. Schumpeter, Joseph A., 1947. "The Creative Response in Economic History," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 7(2), pages 149-159, November.
    12. Dale T. Mortensen & Christopher A. Pissarides, 1998. "Technological Progress, Job Creation and Job Destruction," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 1(4), pages 733-753, October.
    13. Nadiri, M.I., 1993. "Innovations and Technological Spillovers," Working Papers 93-31, C.V. Starr Center for Applied Economics, New York University.
    14. Melissa Kerr Chiovenda, 2020. "Derrida's Unconditional Hospitality as the Improbable: An Example of Innovation in Refugee Care," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 101(7), pages 2437-2449, December.
    15. Richard E. Caves, 1998. "Industrial Organization and New Findings on the Turnover and Mobility of Firms," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 36(4), pages 1947-1982, December.
    16. Dirk Czarnitzki & Otto Toivanen, 2013. "Innovation Policy and Economic Growth," European Economy - Economic Papers 2008 - 2015 482, Directorate General Economic and Financial Affairs (DG ECFIN), European Commission.
    17. Sophia Soyoung Jeong & Dhia Waddah Talib Ali Alhanaee, 2020. "Prosocial Motivation as a Driver of Social Innovation in the UAE," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 101(7), pages 2450-2464, December.
    18. Chang, Shu-Hwa & Huang, Liang-Chou, 2010. "The nexus of finance and GDP growth in Japan: Do real interest rates matter?," Japan and the World Economy, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 235-242, December.
    19. David B. Audretsch, 1995. "Innovation and Industry Evolution," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262011468, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rana P. Maradana & Rudra P. Pradhan & Saurav Dash & Kunal Gaurav & Manju Jayakumar & Debaleena Chatterjee, 2017. "Does innovation promote economic growth? Evidence from European countries," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-23, December.
    2. repec:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:special3:p:402-418 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Fanglin LI & Michael APPIAH & Regina Naa Amua DODOO, 2020. "The Effects Of Technology And Labor On Growth In Emerging Countries," Management Research and Practice, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 12(2), pages 39-47, June.
    4. Pradhan, Rudra P. & Arvin, Mak B. & Bahmani, Sahar, 2018. "Are innovation and financial development causative factors in economic growth? Evidence from a panel granger causality test," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 130-142.
    5. Otilia Georgiana Floroiu, 2020. "Innovation For Growth: Evidence From Cee Eurozone Candidates," Oradea Journal of Business and Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 5(special), pages 124-134, June.
    6. Ismail Senturk & Fiaz Ahmad Sulehri & Syeda Mehak Ali, 2022. "Financial Development and Innovation Led-Growth: A Case of Selected Developing Countries," Journal of Policy Research (JPR), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 8(3), pages 81-97, September.
    7. Rodica Crudu, 2019. "The Role of Innovative Entrepreneurship in the Economic Development of EU Member Countries," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 15(1), pages 35-60.
    8. Janusz Myszczyszyn & Irena Lacka & Sylwia Golab & Beata Bedzik & Blazej Supron, 2021. "A Preliminary Analysis of the Relationship between Economic Growth and Selected Innovativeness Indicators on the Example of Four European Union Countries," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 2), pages 402-418.
    9. Pradhan, Rudra P. & Arvin, Mak B. & Nair, Mahendhiran & Bennett, Sara E., 2020. "The dynamics among entrepreneurship, innovation, and economic growth in the Eurozone countries," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 42(5), pages 1106-1122.
    10. Mariia Shkolnykova & Lasse Steffens & Jan Wedemeier, 2024. "Systems of innovation: Path of economic transition and differences in institutions in central and Eastern Europe?," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(1), March.
    11. Eric Bartelsman & Andrea Bassanini & John Haltiwanger & Ron Jarmin & Stefano Scarpetta & Thorsten Schank, 2002. "The Spread of ICT and Productivity Growth: Is Europe Really Lagging Behind in the New Economy?," CEPN Working Papers halshs-00289168, HAL.
    12. Aparicio, Sebastian & Urbano, David & Audretsch, David, 2016. "Institutional factors, opportunity entrepreneurship and economic growth: Panel data evidence," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 45-61.
    13. Nicholas Tsounis & Ian Steedman, 2021. "A New Method for Measuring Total Factor Productivity Growth Based on the Full Industry Equilibrium Approach: The Case of the Greek Economy," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-21, August.
    14. Carmela Martin & Francisco J. Velazquez & Bernard Funck, 2001. "European Integration and Income Convergence : Lessons for Central and Eastern European Countries," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 13968, April.
    15. Mohsen Mohammadi Khyareh & Nasrin Rostami, 2022. "Macroeconomic Conditions, Innovation and Competitiveness," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(2), pages 1321-1340, June.
    16. Pedro de Faria & Francisco Lima, 2012. "Interdependence and spillovers: is firm performance affected by others’ innovation activities?," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(36), pages 4765-4775, December.
    17. Dai, Lu & Zhang, Jiajun & Luo, Shougui, 2022. "Effective R&D capital and total factor productivity: Evidence using spatial panel data models," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    18. Capolupo, Rosa, 2009. "The New Growth Theories and Their Empirics after Twenty Years," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), vol. 3, pages 1-72.
    19. Rosa Capolupo, 2005. "THE NEW GROWTH THEORIES AND THEIR EMPIRICS, Discussion Paper in Economics, University of Glasgow, N. 2005-04 (http://www.gla.ac.uk/Acad/Economics," GE, Growth, Math methods 0506003, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Schubert, Torben & Jäger, Angela & Türkeli, Serdar & Visentin, Fabiana, 2020. "Addressing the productivity paradox with big data: A literature review and adaptation of the CDM econometric model," MERIT Working Papers 2020-050, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    21. Mark Partridge & Shawn M. Rohlin & Amanda L. Weinstein, 0. "Firm formation and survival in the shale boom," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-22.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:104:y:2023:i:4:p:395-405. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.