IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v104y2023i3p230-247.html

Moral intuitions and vaccine hesitancy during the COVID‐19 pandemic

Author

Listed:
  • John Iceland
  • Eric Silver
  • Kerby Goff

Abstract

Background While the COVID‐19 pandemic has resulted in millions of deaths worldwide, the rapid development and distribution of novel vaccines reduced the scale of severe illness and death. Even so, many people remain unvaccinated. Objective We investigate the extent to which various moral intuitions are associated with COVID‐19 vaccine hesitancy. Methods We use data from a 2021 national YouGov sample of U.S. adults and logistic regression to examine the association between moral intuitions, net of other factors, and getting vaccinated for COVID‐19. Results Individualizing moral intuitions, which emphasize care and fairness, are positively associated with the likelihood of getting vaccinated. We also find that binding moral intuitions—which emphasize loyalty, respect for authority, and sanctity of the human body—are negatively associated with getting vaccinated and that this association is driven largely by sanctity. Finally, those whose moral intuitions emphasize liberty are significantly less likely to get vaccinated. Conclusion Moral intuitions are strongly associated with vaccine hesitancy, suggesting that the success of public health measures during a global health crisis depends on addressing the variety of underlying moral concerns that influence people's attitudes and behaviors.

Suggested Citation

  • John Iceland & Eric Silver & Kerby Goff, 2023. "Moral intuitions and vaccine hesitancy during the COVID‐19 pandemic," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 104(3), pages 230-247, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:104:y:2023:i:3:p:230-247
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.13243
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13243
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.13243?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ansolabehere, Stephen & Schaffner, Brian F., 2014. "Does Survey Mode Still Matter? Findings from a 2010 Multi-Mode Comparison," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(3), pages 285-303, July.
    2. Samuel Stroope & Rhiannon A. Kroeger & Courtney E. Williams & Joseph O. Baker, 2021. "Sociodemographic correlates of vaccine hesitancy in the United States and the mediating role of beliefs about governmental conspiracies," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 102(6), pages 2472-2481, November.
    3. Long H. Nguyen & Amit D. Joshi & David A. Drew & Jordi Merino & Wenjie Ma & Chun-Han Lo & Sohee Kwon & Kai Wang & Mark S. Graham & Lorenzo Polidori & Cristina Menni & Carole H. Sudre & Adjoa Anyane-Ye, 2022. "Author Correction: Self-reported COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and uptake among participants from different racial and ethnic groups in the United States and United Kingdom," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-1, December.
    4. Sanders, David & Clarke, Harold D. & Stewart, Marianne C. & Whiteley, Paul, 2007. "Does Mode Matter For Modeling Political Choice? Evidence From the 2005 British Election Study," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(3), pages 257-285, July.
    5. Yaqub, Ohid & Castle-Clarke, Sophie & Sevdalis, Nick & Chataway, Joanna, 2014. "Attitudes to vaccination: A critical review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 1-11.
    6. Freimuth, Vicki S. & Jamison, Amelia M. & An, Ji & Hancock, Gregory R. & Quinn, Sandra Crouse, 2017. "Determinants of trust in the flu vaccine for African Americans and Whites," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 70-79.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jamison, Amelia M. & Quinn, Sandra Crouse & Freimuth, Vicki S., 2019. "“You don't trust a government vaccine”: Narratives of institutional trust and influenza vaccination among African American and white adults," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 87-94.
    2. Hannan, Kellie & Cullen, Francis T. & Butler, Leah C. & Graham, Amanda & Burton, Alexander L. & Burton, Velmer S. Jr., 2020. "Racial Sympathy and Support for Capital Punishment: A Case Study in Concept Transfer," SocArXiv xybj9, Center for Open Science.
    3. Helen Dickinson & Anne Kavanagh & Stefanie Dimov & Marissa Shields & Ashley McAllister, 2023. "Political legitimacy and vaccine hesitancy: Disability support workers in Australia," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 42(1), pages 104-116.
    4. Lahijani, Ariana Y. & King, Adrian R. & Gullatte, Mary M. & Hennink, Monique & Bednarczyk, Robert A., 2021. "HPV Vaccine Promotion: The church as an agent of change," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    5. Rinscheid, Adrian & Wüstenhagen, Rolf, 2018. "Divesting, Fast and Slow: Affective and Cognitive Drivers of Fading Voter Support for a Nuclear Phase-Out," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 51-61.
    6. Philipp Wassler & Giacomo Del Chiappa & Thi Hong Hai Nguyen & Giancarlo Fedeli & Nigel L. Williams, 2022. "Increasing vaccination intention in pandemic times: a social marketing perspective," Italian Journal of Marketing, Springer, vol. 2022(1), pages 37-58, March.
    7. Joana Mendonça & Ana Patrícia Hilário, 2023. "Healthism vis-à-vis Vaccine Hesitancy: Insights from Parents Who Either Delay or Refuse Children’s Vaccination in Portugal," Societies, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-15, August.
    8. repec:beo:swcetp:23-03 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Theiss Bendixen, 2020. "How cultural evolution can inform the science of science communication—and vice versa," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-10, December.
    10. Helbling, Marc & Jungkunz, Sebastian, 2020. "Social divides in the age of globalization," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 43(6), pages 1187-1210.
    11. Piatak Jaclyn, 2023. "Do Sociocultural Factors Drive Civic Engagement? An Examination of Political Interest and Religious Attendance," Nonprofit Policy Forum, De Gruyter, vol. 14(2), pages 185-204, April.
    12. Baumberg, Ben, 2016. "Benefit `myths'? The accuracy and inaccuracy of public beliefs about the benefits system," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 103512, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    13. Capers, Marshae & Chamberlain, Jillian & Cline, Jordan & Metcalfe, Christi & Murphy, Akili, 2024. "Beyond George Floyd: Assessing sentiments on police fund reallocation and its intersection with race and racial resentment," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    14. Vincenzo Carrieri & Raffele Lagravinese & Giuliano Resce, 2021. "Predicting vaccine hesitancy from area‐level indicators: A machine learning approach," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(12), pages 3248-3256, December.
    15. Mohammad Reza Farzanegan & Hans Philipp Hofmann, 2021. "An Old Plug and a New Virus: Effect of Public Corruption on the Covid-19 Immunization Progress," CESifo Working Paper Series 9307, CESifo.
    16. David M. Konisky & Llewelyn Hughes & Charles H. Kaylor, 2016. "Extreme weather events and climate change concern," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 134(4), pages 533-547, February.
    17. Antonini, Marcello & Genie, Mesfin G. & Attwell, Katie & Attema, Arthur E. & Ward, Jeremy K. & Melegaro, Alessia & Torbica, Aleksandra & Kelly, Brian & Berardi, Chiara & Sequeira, Ana Rita & McGregor,, 2025. "Are we ready for the next pandemic? Public preferences and trade-offs between vaccine characteristics and societal restrictions across 21 countries," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 366(C).
    18. McFadden, Brandon R. & Malone, Trey, 2018. "How will mandatory labeling of genetically modified food nudge consumer decision-making?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 186-194.
    19. Hill, Patrick L. & Burrow, Anthony L. & Strecher, Victor J., 2021. "Sense of purpose in life predicts greater willingness for COVID-19 vaccination," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    20. Craig F. Berning & Brian E. Roe, 2017. "Assessing the National Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard of 2016: Can Americans Access Electronic Disclosure Information?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-9, May.
    21. Anderson, Brilé & Bernauer, Thomas, 2016. "How much carbon offsetting and where? Implications of efficiency, effectiveness, and ethicality considerations for public opinion formation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 387-395.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:104:y:2023:i:3:p:230-247. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.