IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/chsofr/v199y2025ip1s0960077925005752.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Combining deliberate study and heuristics to form opinions on interconnected questions

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Ruijie
  • Zhou, Yuhao
  • Medo, Matúš

Abstract

The ever-increasing complexity of the world around us challenges our ability to understand it. We study a model where an individual forms opinions about many interconnected questions. This model was shown to be challenging for a boundedly rational agent. We extend it by assuming that the individual combines a targeted study of some questions and various heuristics for the remaining ones. We find that the highest opinion accuracy is generally achieved when neither one question is studied particularly well nor when many questions are studied a little. Despite big differences in accuracy between the considered heuristics, the optimal number of questions in which the study budget is invested grows linearly with the budget for all of them. The study budget necessary to achieve the desired opinion accuracy exhibits a simple scaling with the total number of questions. In this way, we exemplify efficient learning in a complex system using simple heuristics.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Ruijie & Zhou, Yuhao & Medo, Matúš, 2025. "Combining deliberate study and heuristics to form opinions on interconnected questions," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 199(P1).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:199:y:2025:i:p1:s0960077925005752
    DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2025.116562
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960077925005752
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.chaos.2025.116562?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:199:y:2025:i:p1:s0960077925005752. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thayer, Thomas R. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/chaos-solitons-and-fractals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.