IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v103y2022i5p1248-1259.html

Labor union, between group inequality, and individual attitudes toward redistribution

Author

Listed:
  • Sung Min Han
  • Fangjin Ye

Abstract

Objectives We attempt to examine how union membership affects redistributive attitudes. We argue that the impact of union membership on support for redistributive policies is conditional on the economic inequality between the union and nonunion members (between group inequality [BGI]). When BGI is high, unions have less incentive to emphasize the solidaristic redistributive norm because the majority of union members would not be the beneficiaries of government redistribution. Methods We employ multilevel modeling using the International Social Survey Programme (ISSP) datasets that cover 39 countries between 1985 and 2010. Results We find that the positive effect of union membership on individual support for redistributive policies decreases as the level of BGI increases. Conclusion Our study demonstrates the importance of group‐level inequality as the contextual factor in explaining the nexus between union membership and preferences for government redistribution. It also suggests that unions play a substantial role in shaping members’ attitudes toward government policies in general.

Suggested Citation

  • Sung Min Han & Fangjin Ye, 2022. "Labor union, between group inequality, and individual attitudes toward redistribution," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 103(5), pages 1248-1259, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:103:y:2022:i:5:p:1248-1259
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.13207
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13207
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.13207?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Iversen, Torben & Soskice, David, 2006. "Electoral Institutions and the Politics of Coalitions: Why Some Democracies Redistribute More Than Others," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 100(2), pages 165-181, May.
    2. Andrew Hildreth & Stephen Pudney, "undated". "Employers, Workers and Unions: An Analysis of a Firm-Worker Panel with Endogenous Sampling, Attrition and Missing Data," Discussion Papers in Economics 96/15, Division of Economics, School of Business, University of Leicester.
    3. David Macdonald, 2019. "Labor Unions and Support for Redistribution in an Era of Inequality," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 100(4), pages 1197-1214, June.
    4. Ahlquist, John S. & Clayton, Amanda B. & Levi, Margaret, 2014. "Provoking Preferences: Unionization, Trade Policy, and the ILWU Puzzle," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 68(1), pages 33-75, January.
    5. M Rama, 2000. "Wage misalignment in CFA countries: were labour market policies to blame?," Journal of African Economies, Centre for the Study of African Economies, vol. 9(4), pages 475-511.
    6. Thomas C. Buchmueller & John Dinardo & Robert G. Valletta, 2002. "Union Effects on Health Insurance Provision and Coverage in the United States," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 55(4), pages 610-627, July.
    7. Roland Benabou & Efe A. Ok, 2001. "Social Mobility and the Demand for Redistribution: The Poum Hypothesis," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 116(2), pages 447-487.
    8. Rueda, David, 2005. "Insider–Outsider Politics in Industrialized Democracies: The Challenge to Social Democratic Parties," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 99(1), pages 61-74, February.
    9. Frederick Solt, 2020. "Measuring Income Inequality Across Countries and Over Time: The Standardized World Income Inequality Database," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 101(3), pages 1183-1199, May.
    10. Alison L. Booth & Mark L. Bryan, 2004. "The Union Membership Wage-Premium Puzzle: Is There a Free Rider Problem?," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 57(3), pages 402-421, April.
    11. David Rueda & Daniel Stegmueller, 2016. "The Externalities of Inequality: Fear of Crime and Preferences for Redistribution in Western Europe," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 60(2), pages 472-489, April.
    12. Nina Torm, 2018. "Does union membership pay off?: Evidence from Vietnamese SMEs," WIDER Working Paper Series 71, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    13. James P. Allan & Lyle Scruggs, 2004. "Political Partisanship and Welfare State Reform in Advanced Industrial Societies," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 48(3), pages 496-512, July.
    14. Shayo, Moses, 2009. "A Model of Social Identity with an Application to Political Economy: Nation, Class, and Redistribution," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 103(2), pages 147-174, May.
    15. Sung Eun Kim & Yotam Margalit, 2017. "Informed Preferences? The Impact of Unions on Workers' Policy Views," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 61(3), pages 728-743, July.
    16. Nina Torm, 2018. "Does union membership pay off?: Evidence from Vietnamese SMEs," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2018-71, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michel André Maréchal & Alain Cohn & Jeffrey Yusof & Raymond Fisman, 2025. "Whose Preferences Matter for Redistribution? Cross-Country Evidence," Journal of Political Economy Microeconomics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 3(1), pages 1-24.
    2. Lucas Ronconi & Ravi Kanbur & Santiago López-Cariboni, 2019. "Who demands labour (de)regulation in the developing world?: Insider-outsider theory revisited," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2019-90, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    3. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/13pk3v50kg9i9q98f7erie10rb is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Gilles Le Garrec, 2014. "Fairness, socialization and the cultural deman for redistribution," Documents de Travail de l'OFCE 2014-20, Observatoire Francais des Conjonctures Economiques (OFCE).
    5. Gilles Le Garrec, 2018. "Fairness, social norms and the cultural demand for redistribution," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 50(2), pages 191-212, February.
    6. Xabier Garcia-Fuente, 2021. "The Paradox of Redistribution in Time. Social Spending in 53 Countries, 1967-2018," LIS Working papers 815, LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg.
    7. Gilles Le Garrec, 2014. "Fairness, socialization and the cultural deman for redistribution," Working Papers hal-03429910, HAL.
    8. Yan, Alan Nigel, 2023. "The minimal effects of union membership on political attitudes," SocArXiv zabrq, Center for Open Science.
    9. Salmai Qari & Kai Konrad & Benny Geys, 2012. "Patriotism, taxation and international mobility," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 151(3), pages 695-717, June.
    10. Gilles Le Garrec, 2014. "Fairness, socialization and the cultural deman for redistribution," Sciences Po Economics Publications (main) hal-03429910, HAL.
    11. Lucas RONCONI & Ravi KANBUR & Santiago LÓPEZ‐CARIBONI, 2023. "Who demands labour (de)regulation in the developing world? Revisiting the insider–outsider theory," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 162(2), pages 223-243, June.
    12. Kanbur, Ravi & Ronconi, Lucas & López-Cariboni, Santiago, 2020. "Who demands labour (de)regulation in the developing world? Insider–outsider theory revisited," CEPR Discussion Papers 14277, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    13. Støstad, Morten Nyborg & Cowell, Frank, 2024. "Inequality as an externality: Consequences for tax design," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    14. Heise, Arne & Serfraz Khan, Ayesha, 2018. "The welfare state and liberal democracy: A political economy approach," ZÖSS-Discussion Papers 71, University of Hamburg, Centre for Economic and Sociological Studies (CESS/ZÖSS).
    15. Salomon, Katja, 2020. "Dynamics of immigrant resentment in Europe," Discussion Papers, Presidential Department P 2020-002, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    16. Windsteiger, Lisa, 2022. "The redistributive consequences of segregation and misperceptions," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    17. Yeandle, Alex & Green, Jane & Le Corre, Tiphaine, 2024. "Economic hardship and support for redistribution: synthesising five themes in the literature," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 125294, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    18. El Rafhi, Bilal & Darcillon, Thibault, 2024. "The evolution of affluent support for redistribution in Germany in the context of rising inequalities," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    19. Andreoli, Francesco & Olivera, Javier, 2020. "Preferences for redistribution and exposure to tax-benefit schemes in Europe," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    20. Pavithra Suryanarayan, 2017. "When do the poor vote for the right-wing and why: Status inequality and vote choice in the Indian states," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2017-20, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    21. Andreas Georgiadis & Alan Manning, 2012. "Spend it like Beckham? Inequality and redistribution in the UK, 1983–2004," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 151(3), pages 537-563, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:103:y:2022:i:5:p:1248-1259. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.