IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revpol/v39y2022i3p255-281.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Collective learning and COVID‐19 mitigation in Ghana

Author

Listed:
  • Alex Osei‐Kojo
  • Paul Lawer Kenney
  • Clement Mensah Damoah
  • Albert Ahenkan

Abstract

COVID‐19 has created significant uncertainty and disruption among governments and people across the globe. Policy studies present various theoretical frameworks that allow scholars and practitioners to make sense of these developments in a structured and systematic fashion. In this paper, we combined the collective learning framework with documentary data and process tracing analysis to describe, first, the features of the COVID‐19 collective learning setting in Ghana. Next, we explored the linkages among learning processes, learning products, and COVID‐19 mitigation. We found that diverse policy actors operated at distinct levels of government and performed different functions in managing the pandemic. Furthermore, we confirmed all three phases of learning (acquisition, translation, and dissemination) in Ghana's context. Lastly, policies, such as public gathering management, mandatory mask‐wearing, partial lockdown, and fiscal and tax reliefs enabled the government to mitigate the pandemic's impact on people. We conclude by highlighting the implications of these findings for policy learning scholarship. 2019冠状病毒病(COVID‐19)已为全球政府和人民带来显著的不确定性和干扰。政策研究展示了不同理论框架,以供学者和从业人员从结构化和系统性方式理解这些发展。本文中,我们将集体学习框架与文献数据及过程追踪分析相结合,描述加纳COVID‐19集体学习情境的特征。随后,我们探究了学习过程、学习结果和COVID‐19缓解之间的联系。我们发现,不同的政策行动者在独特的政府层面进行操作,并在管理大流行一事中发挥不同作用。此外,我们证实了加纳情境下学习的三个阶段(获取、转化和传播)。最后,与例如公共集会管理、强制佩戴口罩、局部封城、以及财政和税收减免相关的一系列政策都为政府缓解大流行对人们造成的影响一事提供适宜条件。我们的结论强调了这些研究发现对政策学习文献产生的意义。 COVID‐19 ha creado una gran incertidumbre y trastornos entre los gobiernos y las personas de todo el mundo. Los estudios de políticas presentan varios marcos teóricos que permiten a los académicos y profesionales dar sentido a estos desarrollos de una manera estructurada y sistemática. En este artículo, combinamos el marco de aprendizaje colectivo con datos documentales y análisis de seguimiento de procesos para describir, en primer lugar, las características del entorno de aprendizaje colectivo COVID‐19 en Ghana. A continuación, exploramos los vínculos entre los procesos de aprendizaje, los productos de aprendizaje y la mitigación de COVID‐19. Descubrimos que diversos actores políticos operaban en distintos niveles de gobierno y desempeñaban diferentes funciones en el manejo de la pandemia. Además, confirmamos las tres fases del aprendizaje (adquisición, traducción y difusión) en el contexto de Ghana. Por último, políticas como la gestión de reuniones públicas, el uso obligatorio de máscaras, el cierre parcial y las desgravaciones fiscales permitieron al gobierno mitigar el impacto de la pandemia en las personas. Concluimos destacando las implicaciones de estos hallazgos para la erudición del aprendizaje de políticas.

Suggested Citation

  • Alex Osei‐Kojo & Paul Lawer Kenney & Clement Mensah Damoah & Albert Ahenkan, 2022. "Collective learning and COVID‐19 mitigation in Ghana," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 39(3), pages 255-281, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:39:y:2022:i:3:p:255-281
    DOI: 10.1111/ropr.12465
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12465
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ropr.12465?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Williams, Russell Alan, 2009. "Exogenous Shocks in Subsystem Adjustment and Policy Change: The Credit Crunch and Canadian Banking Regulation," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 29(1), pages 29-53, April.
    2. Weaver, R. Kent, 1986. "The Politics of Blame Avoidance," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 6(4), pages 371-398, October.
    3. Deserai A. Crow & Elizabeth A. Albright & Todd Ely & Elizabeth Koebele & Lydia Lawhon, 2018. "Do Disasters Lead to Learning? Financial Policy Change in Local Government," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 35(4), pages 564-589, July.
    4. Betty Vandenbosch & Chris Higgins, 1996. "Information Acquisition and Mental Models: An Investigation into the Relationship Between Behaviour and Learning," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 7(2), pages 198-214, June.
    5. Alessia Contu & Hugh Willmott, 2003. "Re-Embedding Situatedness: The Importance of Power Relations in Learning Theory," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 14(3), pages 283-296, June.
    6. Claire A. Dunlop & Claudio M. Radaelli, 2013. "Systematising Policy Learning: From Monolith to Dimensions," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 61(3), pages 599-619, October.
    7. Janet Frantz & Hajime Sato, 2005. "The fertile soil for policy learning," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 38(2), pages 159-176, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Heather Millar, 2020. "Problem Uncertainty, Institutional Insularity, and Modes of Learning in Canadian Provincial Hydraulic Fracturing Regulation," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 37(6), pages 765-796, November.
    2. Michael Kaethler, 2019. "Curating creative communities of practice: the role of ambiguity," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 8(1), pages 1-17, December.
    3. Anders Gustafsson, 2019. "Busy doing nothing: why politicians implement inefficient policies," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 282-299, September.
    4. Emmanuelle Vaast & Geoff Walsham, 2009. "Trans-Situated Learning: Supporting a Network of Practice with an Information Infrastructure," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 547-564, December.
    5. Henrik Serup Christensen & Lauri Rapeli, 2021. "Immediate rewards or delayed gratification? A conjoint survey experiment of the public’s policy preferences," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 54(1), pages 63-94, March.
    6. Yannis Papadopoulos, 2018. "How does knowledge circulate in a regulatory network? Observing a European Platform of Regulatory Authorities meeting," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(4), pages 431-450, December.
    7. Sofia Vasilopoulou & Daphne Halikiopoulou & Theofanis Exadaktylos, 2014. "Greece in Crisis: Austerity, Populism and the Politics of Blame," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(2), pages 388-402, March.
    8. Andrew J. Rosman, 2011. "Auditors' going‐concern judgments: rigid, adaptive, or both?," Review of Accounting and Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 10(1), pages 30-45, February.
    9. Schimank, Uwe & Stucke, Andreas (ed.), 1994. "Coping with Trouble: How Science Reacts to Political Disturbances of Research Conditions," Schriften aus dem Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung Köln, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, volume 14, number 14.
    10. Simon Turner, 2013. "Absorptive Capacity: The Role of Communities of Practice," Working Papers wp444, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
    11. Livia Johannesson & Noomi Weinryb, 2021. "How to blame and make a difference: perceived responsibility and policy consequences in two Swedish pro-migrant campaigns," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 54(1), pages 41-62, March.
    12. Fredrik von Malmborg & Peter A. Strachan, 2023. "Advocacy Coalitions and Paths to Policy Change for Promoting Energy Efficiency in European Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-21, April.
    13. Yumin Shu & Zhongying Qi, 2020. "The Effect of Market-Oriented Government Fiscal Expenditure on the Evolution of Industrial Structure: Evidence from Shenzhen, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-17, May.
    14. Sten Hansson, 2018. "The discursive micro-politics of blame avoidance: unpacking the language of government blame games," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 51(4), pages 545-564, December.
    15. Laurie Field, 2017. "Interest Differences and Organizational Learning," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-14, August.
    16. Raissa Ulbrich & Claudia Pahl-Wostl, 2019. "The German Permaculture Community from a Community of Practice Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-21, February.
    17. Zohlnhöfer, Reimut, 1999. "Der lange Schatten der schönen Illusion: Finanzpolitik nach der deutschen Einheit, 1990 - 1998," Working papers of the ZeS 09/1999, University of Bremen, Centre for Social Policy Research (ZeS).
    18. Argenton, Cédric & Potters, Jan & Yang, Yadi, 2023. "Receiving credit: On delegation and responsibility," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    19. Yoshio Iida & Christiane Schwieren, 2016. "Contributing for Myself, but Free riding for My Group?," German Economic Review, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 17(1), pages 36-47, February.
    20. Ekaterina Domorenok & Anthony R. Zito, 2021. "Engines of learning? Policy instruments, cities and climate governance," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 54(3), pages 507-528, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:39:y:2022:i:3:p:255-281. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipsonea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.