IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/popmgt/v32y2023i5p1529-1549.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

When preemptive risk mitigation is insufficient: The effectiveness of continuity and resilience techniques during COVID‐19

Author

Listed:
  • Anne E. Dohmen
  • Jason R. W. Merrick
  • Lance W. Saunders
  • Theodore P. Stank
  • Thomas J. Goldsby

Abstract

The extreme demand volatility caused by corona virus 2019 (COVID‐19) overwhelmed most preemptive measures enacted by firms to mitigate disruptions in their supply chains. This led to the rapid implementation of reactive measures to provide business continuity. The operations and supply chain management literature has grouped these reactive techniques into those that involve the reconfiguration of firm resources and those that involve changes to its decision‐making processes. Unfortunately, little of this work has empirically assessed the efficacy of individual reactive techniques on business continuity after the onset of a disruption such as COVID‐19. The research reported in this paper addresses this gap through an experimental design and discrete‐event simulation to empirically test the impact on firm outcomes of resource reconfiguration techniques versus those related to adaptive decision‐making processes. Data from a canned foods manufacturer is used to populate the simulation and isolate the impact of these reactive changes implemented in March 2020 at the beginning of the COVID‐19 disruption on the attainment of business continuity in the 3 months following the COVID‐19 disruption. The results show that for this company, decision‐making changes—specifically changes to planning process cadence and time horizon—had more impact on business continuity than those focused on resource reconfiguration (increasing capacity through stock keeping unit (SKU) prioritization and increasing the number of shifts). These results, in addition to qualitative data collected from company executives to provide context for the modeling results, are used to provide insights that are generalizable to many firms.

Suggested Citation

  • Anne E. Dohmen & Jason R. W. Merrick & Lance W. Saunders & Theodore P. Stank & Thomas J. Goldsby, 2023. "When preemptive risk mitigation is insufficient: The effectiveness of continuity and resilience techniques during COVID‐19," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(5), pages 1529-1549, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:popmgt:v:32:y:2023:i:5:p:1529-1549
    DOI: 10.1111/poms.13677
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13677
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/poms.13677?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Simon Thevenin & Yossiri Adulyasak & Jean‐François Cordeau, 2021. "Material Requirements Planning Under Demand Uncertainty Using Stochastic Optimization," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(2), pages 475-493, February.
    2. Morris A. Cohen & Panos Kouvelis, 2021. "Revisit of AAA Excellence of Global Value Chains: Robustness, Resilience, and Realignment," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(3), pages 633-643, March.
    3. Brian Tomlin, 2006. "On the Value of Mitigation and Contingency Strategies for Managing Supply Chain Disruption Risks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(5), pages 639-657, May.
    4. David Simchi‐Levi & He Wang & Yehua Wei, 2018. "Increasing Supply Chain Robustness through Process Flexibility and Inventory," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 27(8), pages 1476-1491, August.
    5. ManMohan S. Sodhi & Christopher S. Tang, 2021. "Supply Chain Management for Extreme Conditions: Research Opportunities," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 57(1), pages 7-16, January.
    6. Isik Bicer & Verena Hagspiel & Suzanne de Treville, 2018. "Valuing Supply-Chain Responsiveness Under Demand Jumps," Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper Series 18-44, Swiss Finance Institute.
    7. Dmitry Ivanov & Alexandre Dolgui, 2020. "Viability of intertwined supply networks: extending the supply chain resilience angles towards survivability. A position paper motivated by COVID-19 outbreak," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(10), pages 2904-2915, May.
    8. Cheryl Gaimon & Karthik Ramachandran, 2021. "The Knowledge Value Chain: An Operational Perspective," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(3), pages 715-724, March.
    9. Thomas W. Lucas & W. David Kelton & Paul J. Sánchez & Susan M. Sanchez & Ben L. Anderson, 2015. "Changing the paradigm: Simulation, now a method of first resort," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 62(4), pages 293-303, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Priom Mahmud & Sanjoy Kumar Paul & Abdullahil Azeem & Priyabrata Chowdhury, 2021. "Evaluating Supply Chain Collaboration Barriers in Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-28, July.
    2. Basu R, Jothi & Abdulrahman, Muhammad D. & Yuvaraj, M., 2023. "Improving agility and resilience of automotive spares supply chain: The additive manufacturing enabled truck model," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    3. Dmitry Ivanov, 2022. "Viable supply chain model: integrating agility, resilience and sustainability perspectives—lessons from and thinking beyond the COVID-19 pandemic," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 1411-1431, December.
    4. Liu, Zhongyi & Li, Mengyu & Zhai, Xin, 2022. "Managing supply chain disruption threat via a strategy combining pricing and self-protection," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    5. Bianco, Débora & Bueno, Adauto & Godinho Filho, Moacir & Latan, Hengky & Miller Devós Ganga, Gilberto & Frank, Alejandro G. & Chiappetta Jabbour, Charbel Jose, 2023. "The role of Industry 4.0 in developing resilience for manufacturing companies during COVID-19," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    6. Huang, Hongfu & He, Yong & Li, Dong & Li, Shanshan, 2023. "Competing multinationals’ backshoring decisions: Tax arbitrage versus production reliability tradeoff," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(2), pages 515-532.
    7. El Baz, Jamal & Ruel, Salomée, 2021. "Can supply chain risk management practices mitigate the disruption impacts on supply chains’ resilience and robustness? Evidence from an empirical survey in a COVID-19 outbreak era," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    8. Taleizadeh, Ata Allah & Tafakkori, Keivan & Thaichon, Park, 2021. "Resilience toward supply disruptions: A stochastic inventory control model with partial backordering under the base stock policy," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    9. Shoufeng Ji & Pengyun Zhao & Tingting Ji, 2023. "A Hybrid Optimization Method for Sustainable and Flexible Design of Supply–Production–Distribution Network in the Physical Internet," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-34, April.
    10. René Y. Glogg & Anna Timonina-Farkas & Ralf W. Seifert, 2022. "Modeling and mitigating supply chain disruptions as a bilevel network flow problem," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 395-423, July.
    11. Mohammad Nabipour & M. Ali Ülkü, 2021. "On Deploying Blockchain Technologies in Supply Chain Strategies and the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Literature Review and Research Outlook," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-32, September.
    12. Gupta, Varun & Ivanov, Dmitry & Choi, Tsan-Ming, 2021. "Competitive pricing of substitute products under supply disruption," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    13. Christian F. Durach & Tomas Repasky & Frank Wiengarten, 2023. "Patterns in firms’ inventories and flexibility levels after a low‐probability, high‐impact disruption event: Empirical evidence from the Great East Japan Earthquake," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(6), pages 1705-1723, June.
    14. Ramani, Vinay & Ghosh, Debabrata & Sodhi, ManMohan S., 2022. "Understanding systemic disruption from the Covid-19-induced semiconductor shortage for the auto industry," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    15. Lohmer, Jacob & Bugert, Niels & Lasch, Rainer, 2020. "Analysis of resilience strategies and ripple effect in blockchain-coordinated supply chains: An agent-based simulation study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    16. Karmaker, Chitra Lekha & Bari, A.B.M. Mainul & Anam, Md. Zahidul & Ahmed, Tazim & Ali, Syed Mithun & de Jesus Pacheco, Diego Augusto & Moktadir, Md. Abdul, 2023. "Industry 5.0 challenges for post-pandemic supply chain sustainability in an emerging economy," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    17. Cecil Ash & Uday Venkatadri & Claver Diallo & Peter Vanberkel & Ahmed Saif, 2023. "PPE Supply Optimization Under Risks of Disruption from the COVID-19 Pandemic," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 1-29, June.
    18. K. Katsaliaki & P. Galetsi & S. Kumar, 2022. "Supply chain disruptions and resilience: a major review and future research agenda," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 965-1002, December.
    19. Aghajani, Mojtaba & Ali Torabi, S. & Altay, Nezih, 2023. "Resilient relief supply planning using an integrated procurement-warehousing model under supply disruption," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    20. Remko van Hoek, 2021. "Exploring Progress with Supply Chain Risk Management during the First Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-18, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:popmgt:v:32:y:2023:i:5:p:1529-1549. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1937-5956 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.