IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/popmgt/v30y2021i9p2925-2943.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Simple Mechanisms for Sequential Capacity Allocations

Author

Listed:
  • Bosung Kim
  • Sang Won Kim
  • Seyed M. R. Iravani
  • Kun Soo Park

Abstract

We consider a sequential capacity allocation problem of a firm to its retail branches that sell the firm's product. The orders of the retail branches to the headquarters arrive sequentially, and each allocation decision has to be made before the next order arrives. The objective of the headquarters is to maximize the overall firm profit, that is, the total profit of all the retail branches. Each retail branch makes ordering decision independently by using private information about its local market condition in order to maximize its own profit. Hence, they may strategically inflate their order quantities in their favor, potentially hurting the firm profit. We first discuss the importance of capacity rationing in maximizing the firm's profit by finding the first‐best allocation outcome, the optimal solution without information asymmetry. Based on this, we design mechanisms that effectively overcome the information asymmetry. First, we design a simple threshold‐type mechanism where truthful reporting is optimal and capacity rationing is implemented by limiting allocation beyond a pre‐specified threshold. We show this mechanism is optimal within the class of mechanisms that do not allow any side payments. We also design a mechanism with side payments that is optimal among all possible mechanisms. In particular, we show that this payment‐based mechanism achieves the first‐best allocation, fully overcoming information asymmetry. Although optimal, it may not be practical because of the complexity in the side payment menu, so we also propose a simple variant of it with only a few parameters. Our extensive numerical study shows that our simple threshold‐type and payment‐based mechanisms achieve near‐optimal performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Bosung Kim & Sang Won Kim & Seyed M. R. Iravani & Kun Soo Park, 2021. "Simple Mechanisms for Sequential Capacity Allocations," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(9), pages 2925-2943, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:popmgt:v:30:y:2021:i:9:p:2925-2943
    DOI: 10.1111/poms.13411
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13411
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/poms.13411?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oded Berman & Richard C. Larson, 2001. "Deliveries in an Inventory/Routing Problem Using Stochastic Dynamic Programming," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(2), pages 192-213, May.
    2. Shouqiang Wang & Peng Sun & Francis de Véricourt, 2016. "Inducing Environmental Disclosures: A Dynamic Mechanism Design Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(2), pages 371-389, April.
    3. Guttorm Schjelderup & Lars Sorgard, 1997. "Transfer Pricing as a Strategic Device for Decentralized Multinationals," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 4(3), pages 277-290, July.
    4. Soo-Haeng Cho & Christopher S. Tang, 2014. "Technical Note---Capacity Allocation Under Retail Competition: Uniform and Competitive Allocations," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(1), pages 72-80, February.
    5. Ricardo Alonso & Wouter Dessein & Niko Matouschek, 2008. "When Does Coordination Require Centralization?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 98(1), pages 145-179, March.
    6. Burcu Balcik & Seyed Iravani & Karen Smilowitz, 2014. "Multi-vehicle sequential resource allocation for a nonprofit distribution system," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(12), pages 1279-1297, December.
    7. Zhixin Liu, 2012. "Equilibrium analysis of capacity allocation with demand competition," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 59(3‐4), pages 254-265, April.
    8. Mallik, Suman & Harker, Patrick T., 2004. "Coordinating supply chains with competition: Capacity allocation in semiconductor manufacturing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 159(2), pages 330-347, December.
    9. Ashok Kumar & Leroy B. Schwarz & James E. Ward, 1995. "Risk-Pooling Along a Fixed Delivery Route Using a Dynamic Inventory-Allocation Policy," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(2), pages 344-362, February.
    10. Ricardo Alonso & Wouter Dessein & Niko Matouschek, 2008. "When Does Coordination Require Centralization? Corrigendum," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 98(3), pages 1195-1196, June.
    11. Martin I. Reiman & Rodrigo Rubio & Lawrence M. Wein, 1999. "Heavy Traffic Analysis of the Dynamic Stochastic Inventory-Routing Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(4), pages 361-380, November.
    12. Georgia Perakis & Guillaume Roels, 2008. "Regret in the Newsvendor Model with Partial Information," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(1), pages 188-203, February.
    13. Robert W. Lien & Seyed M. R. Iravani & Karen R. Smilowitz, 2014. "Sequential Resource Allocation for Nonprofit Operations," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(2), pages 301-317, April.
    14. Li, Yina & Xu, Xuejun & Zhao, Xiande & Yeung, Jeff Hoi Yan & Ye, Fei, 2012. "Supply chain coordination with controllable lead time and asymmetric information," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 217(1), pages 108-119.
    15. Felix Papier, 2016. "Supply Allocation Under Sequential Advance Demand Information," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(2), pages 341-361, April.
    16. Gérard P. Cachon & Martin A. Lariviere, 1999. "Capacity Choice and Allocation: Strategic Behavior and Supply Chain Performance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(8), pages 1091-1108, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yuanzheng Ma & Tong Wang & Huan Zheng, 2023. "On fairness and efficiency in nonprofit operations: Dynamic resource allocations," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(6), pages 1778-1792, June.
    2. Jianbin Li & Niu Yu & Zhixin Liu & Xueyuan Cai, 2017. "Allocation with demand competition: Uniform, proportional, and lexicographic mechanisms," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(2), pages 85-107, March.
    3. Zhu, Mengping & Liu, Zhixue & Li, Jianbin & Zhu, Stuart X., 2020. "Electric vehicle battery capacity allocation and recycling with downstream competition," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(1), pages 365-379.
    4. Can Zhang & Atalay Atasu & Turgay Ayer & L. Beril Toktay, 2020. "Truthful Mechanisms for Medical Surplus Product Allocation," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(4), pages 735-753, July.
    5. Zhai, Xin & Ward, James E. & Schwarz, Leroy B., 2011. "Coordinating a one-warehouse N-retailer distribution system under retailer-reporting," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(1), pages 204-211, November.
    6. Zhibin (Ben) Yang & Xinxin Hu & Haresh Gurnani & Huiqi Guan, 2018. "Multichannel Distribution Strategy: Selling to a Competing Buyer with Limited Supplier Capacity," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(5), pages 2199-2218, May.
    7. Cai, Xueyuan & Li, Jianbin & Lian, Zhaotong & Liu, Zhixin, 2022. "Fixed allocation of capacity for multiple retailers under demand competition," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    8. Sonntag, Danja R. & Schrotenboer, Albert H. & Kiesmüller, Gudrun P., 2023. "Stochastic inventory routing with time-based shipment consolidation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(3), pages 1186-1201.
    9. Chakraborty, Abhishek & Mandal, Prasenjit, 2021. "Channel efficiency and retailer tier dominance in a supply chain with a common manufacturer," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(1), pages 100-121.
    10. Gemma Berenguer & Zuo-Jun (Max) Shen, 2020. "OM Forum—Challenges and Strategies in Managing Nonprofit Operations: An Operations Management Perspective," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(5), pages 888-905, September.
    11. Tony Haitao Cui & Yinghao Zhang, 2018. "Cognitive Hierarchy in Capacity Allocation Games," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(3), pages 1250-1270, March.
    12. Eirini Spiliotopoulou & Karen Donohue & Mustafa Çagri Gürbüz, 2022. "Ordering Behavior and the Impact of Allocation Mechanisms in an Integrated Distribution System," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(2), pages 422-441, February.
    13. Xiaoshuai Fan & Ying‐Ju Chen & Christopher S. Tang, 2023. "Allocating scarce resources in the presence of private information and heterogeneous favoritism," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(7), pages 2068-2086, July.
    14. Kim, Bosung & Park, Kun Soo, 2016. "Organizational structure of a global supply chain in the presence of a gray market: Information asymmetry and valuation difference," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 71-80.
    15. Patrick Jaillet & Jonathan F. Bard & Liu Huang & Moshe Dror, 2002. "Delivery Cost Approximations for Inventory Routing Problems in a Rolling Horizon Framework," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(3), pages 292-300, August.
    16. Ziteng Wang & Yue Dai & Shu‐Cherng Fang & Zhong‐Zhong Jiang & Yifan Xu, 2020. "Inventory transshipment game with limited supply: Trap or treat," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 67(6), pages 383-403, September.
    17. Persson, Petra, 2018. "Attention manipulation and information overload," Behavioural Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 2(1), pages 78-106, May.
    18. Andrei Hagiu & Julian Wright, 2015. "Marketplace or Reseller?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(1), pages 184-203, January.
    19. Gianmarco Daniele & Amedeo Piolatto & Willem Sas, 2018. "Who Sent You? Strategic Voting, Transfers and Bailouts in a Federation," Working Papers. Serie AD 2018-05, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie).
    20. Nicholas Bloom & Luis Garicano & Raffaella Sadun & John Van Reenen, 2014. "The Distinct Effects of Information Technology and Communication Technology on Firm Organization," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(12), pages 2859-2885, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:popmgt:v:30:y:2021:i:9:p:2925-2943. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1937-5956 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.