IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/mathfi/v8y1998i2p153-161.html

A Note on Hedging in ARCH and Stochastic Volatility Option Pricing Models

Author

Listed:
  • René Garcia
  • Èric Renault

Abstract

Recently, Duan (1995) proposed a GARCH option pricing formula and a corresponding hedging formula. In a similar ARCH‐type model for the underlying asset, Kallsen and Taqqu (1994) arrived at a hedging formula different from Duan's although they concur on the pricing formula. In this note, we explain this difference by pointing out that the formula developed by Kallsen and Taqqu corresponds to the usual concept of hedging in the context of ARCH‐type models. We argue, however, that Duan's formula has some appeal and we propose a stochastic volatility model that ensures its validity. We conclude by a comparison of ARCH‐type and stochastic volatility option pricing models.

Suggested Citation

  • René Garcia & Èric Renault, 1998. "A Note on Hedging in ARCH and Stochastic Volatility Option Pricing Models," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 8(2), pages 153-161, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:mathfi:v:8:y:1998:i:2:p:153-161
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-9965.00049
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9965.00049
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-9965.00049?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ma, Junmei & Wang, Chen & Xu, Wei, 2025. "A new lattice approach for risk-minimization hedging under generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 321(3), pages 1021-1035.
    2. Peter Christoffersen & Kris Jacobs, 2002. "Which Volatility Model for Option Valuation?," CIRANO Working Papers 2002s-33, CIRANO.
    3. Jean Pierre Fernández Prada Saucedo & Gabriel Rodríguez, 2020. "Modeling the Volatility of Returns on Commodities: An Application and Empirical Comparison of GARCH and SV Models," Documentos de Trabajo / Working Papers 2020-484, Departamento de Economía - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.
    4. Peter Christoffersen & Kris Jacobs, 2004. "Which GARCH Model for Option Valuation?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(9), pages 1204-1221, September.
    5. GARCIA, René & RENAULT, Éric, 1998. "Risk Aversion, Intertemporal Substitution, and Option Pricing," Cahiers de recherche 9801, Universite de Montreal, Departement de sciences economiques.
    6. Ryszard Kokoszczyński & Paweł Sakowski & Robert Ślepaczuk, 2017. "Which Option Pricing Model Is the Best? HF Data for Nikkei 225 Index Options," Central European Economic Journal, Sciendo, vol. 4(51), pages 18-39, December.
    7. Bauwens, Luc & Lubrano, Michel, 2002. "Bayesian option pricing using asymmetric GARCH models," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 9(3), pages 321-342, August.
    8. Maciej Augustyniak & Frédéric Godin & Clarence Simard, 2017. "Assessing the effectiveness of local and global quadratic hedging under GARCH models," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(9), pages 1305-1318, September.
    9. Bruno R'emillard & Sylvain Rubenthaler, 2012. "Optimal hedging in discrete time," Papers 1211.5035, arXiv.org.
    10. Xu Cheng & Eric Renault & Paul Sangrey, 2024. "Identifying the Volatility Risk Price Through the Leverage Effect," PIER Working Paper Archive 24-013, Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania.
    11. Cheng, Xu & Renault, Eric & Sangrey, Paul, 2025. "Identifying the volatility risk price through the leverage effect," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    12. Fengler, Matthias R. & Hin, Lin-Yee, 2015. "Semi-nonparametric estimation of the call-option price surface under strike and time-to-expiry no-arbitrage constraints," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 184(2), pages 242-261.
    13. Jin-Chuan Duan & Peter H. Ritchken & Zhiqiang Sun, 2006. "Jump starting GARCH: pricing and hedging options with jumps in returns and volatilities," Working Papers (Old Series) 0619, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland.
    14. Matthias R. Fengler & Helmut Herwartz & Christian Werner, 2012. "A Dynamic Copula Approach to Recovering the Index Implied Volatility Skew," Journal of Financial Econometrics, Oxford University Press, vol. 10(3), pages 457-493, June.
    15. Maciej Augustyniak & Alexandru Badescu, 2021. "On the computation of hedging strategies in affine GARCH models," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(5), pages 710-735, May.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • G1 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:mathfi:v:8:y:1998:i:2:p:153-161. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0960-1627 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.