IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/manchs/v88y2020i1p211-228.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Structural Change and the Problem of Phantom Break Locations

Author

Listed:
  • Yao Rao
  • Brendan McCabe

Abstract

It is well known, in structural break problems, that it is much easier to detect the existence of a break in a data set than to determine the location of such a break in the sample span. This paper investigates why, in the context of Gaussian linear regressions, using a decision theory framework. The nub of the problem, even for moderately sized breaks, is that the posterior probability distribution of the possible break points is usually not very informative about the true break location. The information content is measured here by a proper scoring rule. Hence, even a locally optimal break location procedure, as introduced here, is ineffective. In the regression context, it turns out to be quite common, indeed the norm, for break location procedures to misidentify the true break position up to 100 per cent of the time. Unfortunately too, the magnitude of the difference between the misidentified and true break locations is usually not small.

Suggested Citation

  • Yao Rao & Brendan McCabe, 2020. "Structural Change and the Problem of Phantom Break Locations," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 88(1), pages 211-228, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:manchs:v:88:y:2020:i:1:p:211-228
    DOI: 10.1111/manc.12298
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/manc.12298
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/manc.12298?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jushan Bai, 1997. "Estimation Of A Change Point In Multiple Regression Models," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 79(4), pages 551-563, November.
    2. Ploberger, Werner & Krämer;, Walter, 1990. "The Local Power of the CUSUM and CUSUM of Squares Tests," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 6(3), pages 335-347, September.
    3. Elliott, Graham & Muller, Ulrich K., 2007. "Confidence sets for the date of a single break in linear time series regressions," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 141(2), pages 1196-1218, December.
    4. Tilmann Gneiting & Fadoua Balabdaoui & Adrian E. Raftery, 2007. "Probabilistic forecasts, calibration and sharpness," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 69(2), pages 243-268, April.
    5. Andrews, Donald W. K. & Lee, Inpyo & Ploberger, Werner, 1996. "Optimal changepoint tests for normal linear regression," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 70(1), pages 9-38, January.
    6. Ploberger, Werner & Kramer, Walter, 1992. "The CUSUM Test with OLS Residuals," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 60(2), pages 271-285, March.
    7. B. P. M. McCabe & M. J. Harrison, 1980. "Testing the Constancy of Regression Relationships Over Time Using Least Squares Residuals," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 29(2), pages 142-148, June.
    8. Rao, Yao & McCabe, Brendan, 2017. "Is MORE LESS? The role of data augmentation in testing for structural breaks," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 131-134.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rao, Yao & McCabe, Brendan, 2017. "Is MORE LESS? The role of data augmentation in testing for structural breaks," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 131-134.
    2. Perron, Pierre & Yabu, Tomoyoshi, 2009. "Estimating deterministic trends with an integrated or stationary noise component," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 151(1), pages 56-69, July.
    3. Ai Deng & Pierre Perron, 2005. "The Limit Distribution of the CUSUM of Square Test Under Genreal MIxing Conditions," Boston University - Department of Economics - Working Papers Series WP2005-046, Boston University - Department of Economics.
    4. Makram El-Shagi & Sebastian Giesen, 2013. "Testing for Structural Breaks at Unknown Time: A Steeplechase," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 41(1), pages 101-123, January.
    5. Deng, Ai & Perron, Pierre, 2008. "A non-local perspective on the power properties of the CUSUM and CUSUM of squares tests for structural change," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 142(1), pages 212-240, January.
    6. Sven Otto & Jorg Breitung, 2020. "Backward CUSUM for Testing and Monitoring Structural Change with an Application to COVID-19 Pandemic Data," Papers 2003.02682, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2022.
    7. Seong Yeon Chang & Pierre Perron, 2018. "A comparison of alternative methods to construct confidence intervals for the estimate of a break date in linear regression models," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(6), pages 577-601, July.
    8. Eiji Kurozumi & Yohei Yamamoto, 2015. "Confidence sets for the break date based on optimal tests," Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 18(3), pages 412-435, October.
    9. Otto, Sven & Breitung, Jörg, 2020. "Backward CUSUM for Testing and Monitoring Structural Change," VfS Annual Conference 2020 (Virtual Conference): Gender Economics 224533, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    10. Alaa Abi Morshed & Elena Andreou & Otilia Boldea, 2018. "Structural Break Tests Robust to Regression Misspecification," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-39, May.
    11. Jiang, Liang & Wang, Xiaohu & Yu, Jun, 2018. "New distribution theory for the estimation of structural break point in mean," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 205(1), pages 156-176.
    12. Ploberger, Werner & Kramer, Walter, 1996. "A trend-resistant test for structural change based on OLS residuals," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 70(1), pages 175-185, January.
    13. Luger, Richard, 2001. "A modified CUSUM test for orthogonal structural changes," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 73(3), pages 301-306, December.
    14. Raffaella Giacomini & Barbara Rossi, 2010. "Forecast comparisons in unstable environments," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(4), pages 595-620.
    15. Boldea, Otilia & Hall, Alastair R., 2013. "Estimation and inference in unstable nonlinear least squares models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 172(1), pages 158-167.
    16. Martin Feldstein & James H. Stock, 1994. "The Use of a Monetary Aggregate to Target Nominal GDP," NBER Chapters, in: Monetary Policy, pages 7-69, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    17. Alastair R. Hall & Denise R. Osborn & Nikolaos Sakkas, 2017. "The asymptotic behaviour of the residual sum of squares in models with multiple break points," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(6-9), pages 667-698, October.
    18. Jamel Jouini, 2006. "Bootstrap Tests in Bivariate VAR Process with Single Structural Change : Power versus Corrected Size and Empirical Illustration," Working Papers halshs-00410759, HAL.
    19. Rossi, Barbara, 2013. "Advances in Forecasting under Instability," Handbook of Economic Forecasting, in: G. Elliott & C. Granger & A. Timmermann (ed.), Handbook of Economic Forecasting, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 0, pages 1203-1324, Elsevier.
    20. Burcu Kapar & William Pouliot, 2013. "Multiple Change-Point Detection in Linear Regression Models via U-Statistic Type Processes," Discussion Papers 13-13, Department of Economics, University of Birmingham.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:manchs:v:88:y:2020:i:1:p:211-228. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/semanuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.