IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jscmgt/v57y2021i4p3-25.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

I Wasn’t Expecting That! The Relational Impact of Negotiation Strategy Expectation Violations

Author

Listed:
  • Stephanie P. Thomas
  • Monique L. Ueltschy Murfield
  • Jacqueline K. Eastman

Abstract

While negotiation within ongoing buyer–supplier relationships is a key element in supply chain management, the emphasis in the literature has been on one‐time, isolated event negotiations. This research, through three scenario‐based experiments with supply chain managers, considers how buyers’ perceptions of past negotiation strategies help to develop future negotiation strategy expectations of their suppliers. If the buyers’ strategy expectations are not met (violated) by the suppliers, these buyers will seek to understand why. Using the combination of expectancy violation theory and attribution theory, this research examines the relational impact of a negotiation strategy expectation violation and the role of extra‐relational factors. The results suggest that relationship history does influence how buyers respond to negotiation strategy expectation violations and that the relational impact of a negative violation is tempered by the history as opposed to a single event reaction. While the findings support that extra‐relational factors can also have a relational impact, buyers perceive differences based on the type of extra‐relational factor (organizational or external) and the type of relational outcome (commitment and relationship value). The results of the interaction of the strategy expectation violation and extra‐relational factor may stretch the boundary conditions of attribution theory. The findings suggest that suppliers should consider how their buying partners may perceive their negotiation behavior and determine the potential relational ramifications of behavior outside of the buyers’ expectations based on previous exchanges.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephanie P. Thomas & Monique L. Ueltschy Murfield & Jacqueline K. Eastman, 2021. "I Wasn’t Expecting That! The Relational Impact of Negotiation Strategy Expectation Violations," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 57(4), pages 3-25, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jscmgt:v:57:y:2021:i:4:p:3-25
    DOI: 10.1111/jscm.12252
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12252
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jscm.12252?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lutz Kaufmann & Jens Esslinger & Craig R. Carter, 2018. "Toward Relationship Resilience: Managing Buyer‐Induced Breaches of Psychological Contracts During Joint Buyer–Supplier Projects," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 54(4), pages 62-85, October.
    2. Young K. Ro & Hung-Chung Su & Yi-Su Chen, 2016. "A Tale of Two Perspectives on an Impending Supply Disruption," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 52(1), pages 3-20, January.
    3. Yuan, Yang & Feng, Bo & Lai, Fujun & Collins, Brian J., 2018. "The role of trust, commitment, and learning orientation on logistic service effectiveness," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 37-50.
    4. Thomas, Rodney W. & Esper, Terry L. & Stank, Theodore P., 2010. "Testing the Negative Effects of Time Pressure in Retail Supply Chain Relationships," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 86(4), pages 386-400.
    5. John L. Graham & Alma T. Mintu & Waymond Rodgers, 1994. "Explorations of Negotiation Behaviors in Ten Foreign Cultures Using a Model Developed in the United States," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(1), pages 72-95, January.
    6. Dabholkar, Pratibha A, 1994. "Incorporating Choice into an Attitudinal Framework: Analyzing Models of Mental Comparison Processes," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 21(1), pages 100-118, June.
    7. Fisher, Robert J, 1993. "Social Desirability Bias and the Validity of Indirect Questioning," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 20(2), pages 303-315, September.
    8. Pilling, Bruce K. & Crosby, Lawrence A. & Jackson, Donald Jr., 1994. "Relational bonds in industrial exchange: An experimental test of the transaction cost economic framework," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 237-251, July.
    9. Patton, Charles & Balakrishnan, P.V. (Sundar), 2010. "The impact of expectation of future negotiation interaction on bargaining processes and outcomes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(8), pages 809-816, August.
    10. Stephane Timmer & Lutz Kaufmann, 2019. "Do Managers’ Dark Personality Traits Help Firms in Coping with Adverse Supply Chain Events?," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 55(4), pages 67-97, October.
    11. Jens Esslinger & Stephanie Eckerd & Lutz Kaufmann & Craig Carter, 2019. "Who Cares? Supplier Reactions to Buyer Claims after Psychological Contract Over‐Fulfillments," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 55(4), pages 98-128, October.
    12. Sangho Chae & Thomas Y. Choi & Daesik Hur, 2017. "Buyer Power and Supplier Relationship Commitment: A Cognitive Evaluation Theory Perspective," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 53(2), pages 39-60, April.
    13. Weiner, Bernard, 2000. "Attributional Thoughts about Consumer Behavior," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 27(3), pages 382-387, December.
    14. Stephanie Eckerd & Kenneth K. Boyer & Yinan Qi & Adam Eckerd & James A. Hill, 2016. "Supply Chain Psychological Contract Breach: An Experimental Study across National Cultures," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 52(3), pages 68-82, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Schmidt, Christoph G. & Wuttke, David A. & Heese, H. Sebastian & Wagner, Stephan M., 2023. "Antecedents of public reactions to supply chain glitches," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    2. Lutz Kaufmann & Moritz Schreiner & Felix Reimann, 2023. "Narratives in supplier negotiations—The interplay of narrative design elements, structural power, and outcomes," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 59(1), pages 66-94, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aslam, Haris & Wanke, Peter & Khalid, Amna & Roubaud, David & Waseem, Maimoona & Chiappetta Jabbour, Charbel Jose & Grebinevych, Oksana & Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, Ana Beatriz, 2022. "A scenario-based experimental study of buyer supplier relationship commitment in the context of a psychological contract breach: Implications for supply chain management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    2. Lutz Kaufmann & Moritz Schreiner & Felix Reimann, 2023. "Narratives in supplier negotiations—The interplay of narrative design elements, structural power, and outcomes," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 59(1), pages 66-94, January.
    3. Saif Mir & Misty Blessley & Zach Zacharia & John Aloysius, 2022. "Mending fences in a buyer–supplier relationship: The role of justice in relationship restoration," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 58(3), pages 23-46, July.
    4. G. Rejikumar & Aswathy Asokan-Ajitha & Sofi Dinesh & Ajay Jose, 2022. "The role of cognitive complexity and risk aversion in online herd behavior," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 585-621, June.
    5. Thomas, Rodney W. & Esper, Terry L. & Stank, Theodore P., 2010. "Testing the Negative Effects of Time Pressure in Retail Supply Chain Relationships," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 86(4), pages 386-400.
    6. David J. Ketchen & Lutz Kaufmann & Craig R. Carter, 2022. "Configurational approaches to theory development in supply chain management: Leveraging underexplored opportunities," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 58(3), pages 71-88, July.
    7. Julia Hartmann & Sebastian Forkmann & Sabine Benoit & Stephan C. Henneberg, 2022. "A consumer perspective on managing the consequences of chain liability," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 58(4), pages 58-89, October.
    8. Jiachun Lu & Lutz Kaufmann & Craig R. Carter, 2021. "How Informal Exchanges Impact Formal Sourcing Collaboration (and What Supply Managers Can Do about It)," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 57(4), pages 26-62, October.
    9. Rodney Thomas & Jessica L. Darby & David Dobrzykowski & Remko van Hoek, 2021. "Decomposing Social Sustainability: Signaling Theory Insights into Supplier Selection Decisions," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 57(4), pages 117-136, October.
    10. Davis-Sramek, Beth & Robinson, Jessica L. & Darby, Jessica L. & Thomas, Rodney W., 2020. "Exploring the differential roles of environmental and social sustainability in carrier selection decisions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    11. Young K. Ro & Hung-Chung Su & Yi-Su Chen, 2016. "A Tale of Two Perspectives on an Impending Supply Disruption," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 52(1), pages 3-20, January.
    12. Wang, Yonggui & Zhang, Lu, 2021. "How customer entitlement influences supplier performance in B2B relationships in emerging economy? A moderated mediation model of institutional environments," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 689-700.
    13. Stephanie Eckerd & Sean Handley & Fabrice Lumineau, 2022. "Trust violations in buyer–supplier relationships: Spillovers and the contingent role of governance structures," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 58(3), pages 47-70, July.
    14. Niels J. Pulles & Raymond P.A. Loohuis, 2020. "Managing Buyer‐Supplier Conflicts: The Effect of Buyer Openness And Directness On A Supplier's Willingness to Adapt," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 56(4), pages 65-81, October.
    15. Huo, Baofeng & Liu, Ruolei & Tian, Min, 2022. "The bright side of dependence asymmetry: Mitigating power use and facilitating relational ties," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    16. Rongfang Yan & Dejun Kou & Bin Lu, 2019. "Optimal Order Policies for Dual-Sourcing Supply Chains under Random Supply Disruption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-14, January.
    17. Gillani, Alvina & Kutaula, Smirti & Budhwar, Pawan S., 2021. "Psychological contract breach: Unraveling the dark side of business-to-business relationships," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 631-641.
    18. Overstreet, Robert E. & Morgan, Tyler R. & Laczniak, Russell N. & Daugherty, Patricia J., 2022. "Stemming the tide of increasing retail returns: Implications of targeted returns policies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 551-562.
    19. Cheng, Junjun & Chen, Bo & Huang, Zihang, 2023. "Collective-based ad transparency in targeted hotel advertising: Consumers’ regulatory focus underlying the crowd safety effect," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    20. Dharshing, Samdruk & Hille, Stefanie Lena & Wüstenhagen, Rolf, 2017. "The Influence of Political Orientation on the Strength and Temporal Persistence of Policy Framing Effects," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 295-305.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jscmgt:v:57:y:2021:i:4:p:3-25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1523-2409 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.