IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jomstd/v50y2013i1p92-125.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Useful Are the Strategic Tools We Teach in Business Schools?

Author

Listed:
  • Robert P. Wright
  • Sotirios E. Paroutis
  • Daniela P. Blettner

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert P. Wright & Sotirios E. Paroutis & Daniela P. Blettner, 2013. "How Useful Are the Strategic Tools We Teach in Business Schools?," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(1), pages 92-125, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:50:y:2013:i:1:p:92-125
    DOI: 10.1111/joms.2013.50.issue-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/10.1111/joms.2013.50.issue-1
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/joms.2013.50.issue-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cheng, Kuo-Tai, 2016. "Test of the mediating effects of regulatory decision tools in the communications regulator," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 277-289.
    2. Gerrit Anton De Waal & Paul Knott, 2019. "Npd Tools, Thoroughness And Performance In Small Firms," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(06), pages 1-26, August.
    3. Fernandez-Vidal, Jorge & Gonzalez, Reyes & Gasco, Jose & Llopis, Juan, 2022. "Digitalization and corporate transformation: The case of European oil & gas firms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    4. Eero Vaara & Juha-Antti Lamberg, 2016. "Taking historical embeddedness seriously : Three historical approaches to advance strategy process and practice research," Post-Print hal-02276732, HAL.
    5. Shameen Prashantham & Mark P. Healey, 2022. "Strategy as Practice Research: Reflections on its Rationale, Approach, and Contributions," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(8), pages 1-17, December.
    6. Roper, Angela & Hodari, Demian, 2015. "Strategy tools: Contextual factors impacting use and usefulness," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 1-12.
    7. John Cantrell & Elias Kyriazis & Gary Noble, 2015. "Developing CSR Giving as a Dynamic Capability for Salient Stakeholder Management," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 130(2), pages 403-421, August.
    8. Idoko, Onyaglanu & MacKay, R. Bradley, 2021. "The performativity of strategic foresight tools: Horizon scanning as an activation device in strategy formation within a UK financial institution," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    9. Ashish Arora & Michelle Gittelman & Sarah Kaplan & John Lynch & Will Mitchell & Nicolaj Siggelkow & Philip Gylfe & Henrika Franck & Curtis Lebaron & Saku Mantere, 2016. "Video methods in strategy research: Focusing on embodied cognition," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(1), pages 133-148, January.
    10. Albana Berisha Qehaja & Enver Kutllovci & Justina Shiroka Pula, 2017. "Strategic Management Tools and Techniques Usage: a Qualitative Review," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 65(2), pages 585-600.
    11. Wenzel, Matthias & Stjerne, Iben Sandal, 2021. "Heuristics-in-use: Toward a practice theory of organizational heuristics," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    12. Binz Astrachan, Claudia & Astrachan, Joseph H. & Kotlar, Josip & Michiels, Anneleen, 2021. "Addressing the theory-practice divide in family business research: The case of shareholder agreements," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 12(1).
    13. Gary T. Burke & Carola Wolf, 2021. "The Process Affordances of Strategy Toolmaking when Addressing Wicked Problems," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(2), pages 359-388, March.
    14. Marc Fréchet & Hervé Goy, 2017. "Does strategy formalization foster innovation? Evidence from a French sample of small to medium-sized enterprises," Post-Print hal-01623788, HAL.
    15. Sammut-Bonnici, Tanya & Paroutis, Sotirios, 2013. "Developing a Dominant Logic of Strategic Innovation," MPRA Paper 50577, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Maria Jose Murcia & Hector O. Rocha & Julian Birkinshaw, 2018. "Business Schools at the Crossroads? A Trip Back from Sparta to Athens," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(2), pages 579-591, June.
    17. Ramirez, R. & Bhatti, Y. & Tapinos, E., 2020. "Exploring how experience and learning curves decrease the time invested in scenario planning interventions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    18. Wołczek Przemysław, 2019. "Solutions Supporting The Strategy Implementation – Model Proposal," Management Sciences. Nauki o Zarządzaniu, Sciendo, vol. 24(2), pages 49-59, June.
    19. Roger Moser & Srinath Rengarajan & Gopalakrishnan Narayanamurthy, 2021. "Decision Intelligence: Creating a Fit between Intelligence Requirements and Intelligence Processing Capacities," IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, , vol. 10(2), pages 160-177, July.
    20. Julia Balogun & Claus Jacobs & Paula Jarzabkowski & Saku Mantere & Eero Vaara, 2014. "Placing Strategy Discourse in Context: Sociomateriality, Sensemaking, and Power," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(2), pages 175-201, March.
    21. Rengarajan, Srinath & Moser, Roger & Narayanamurthy, Gopalakrishnan, 2021. "Strategy tools in dynamic environments – An expert-panel study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:50:y:2013:i:1:p:92-125. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-2380 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.