IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jcmkts/v63y2025i2p507-525.html

Brexit Rhapsody: Exploring Patterns of Issue Salience in the Negotiations

Author

Listed:
  • David Moloney
  • Mads Dagnis Jensen

Abstract

This study revisits the salience of the Brexit negotiations using an advanced Decision‐Making in the European Union (EU) methodology to assess the relative importance of 20 key issues amongst the EU27 member states, the European Commission and the UK. Unlike earlier studies that suggest more uniform salience levels, except for the UK, our analysis identifies eight clusters of actors influenced by their political, economic and geographical contexts. These differences in salience levels have been conducive to logrolling, which likely supported a unified EU stance and a successful agreement with the UK. Additionally, our research quantitatively confirms the UK's distinct salience position, highlighting its isolation and reducing its ability to use divisive negotiation tactics. These findings offer insights into both the dynamics of past Brexit negotiations and ongoing EU–UK policy developments. They contribute to the analysis of Brexit and international negotiations in general by systematically exploring salience in high‐level diplomatic negotiations.

Suggested Citation

  • David Moloney & Mads Dagnis Jensen, 2025. "Brexit Rhapsody: Exploring Patterns of Issue Salience in the Negotiations," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(2), pages 507-525, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:63:y:2025:i:2:p:507-525
    DOI: 10.1111/jcms.13624
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13624
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jcms.13624?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Diana Panke, 2012. "Lobbying Institutional Key Players: How States Seek to Influence the European Commission, the Council Presidency and the European Parliament," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(1), pages 129-150, January.
    2. Andreas Dür & Gemma Mateo, 2010. "Bargaining Power and Negotiation Tactics: The Negotiations on the EU's Financial Perspective, 2007–13," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(3), pages 557-578, June.
    3. Simon Usherwood, 2021. "‘Our European Friends and Partners’? Negotiating the Trade and Cooperation Agreement," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(S1), pages 115-123, September.
    4. Dirk Leuffen & Thomas Malang & Sebastian Wörle, 2014. "Structure, Capacity or Power? Explaining Salience in EU Decision-Making," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(3), pages 616-631, May.
    5. Leonard August Schuette, 2021. "Forging Unity: European Commission Leadership in the Brexit Negotiations," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(5), pages 1142-1159, September.
    6. repec:bla:jcmkts:v:48:y:2010:i::p:557-578 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Magnus Lundgren & Stefanie Bailer & Lisa M Dellmuth & Jonas Tallberg & Silvana Târlea, 2019. "Bargaining success in the reform of the Eurozone," European Union Politics, , vol. 20(1), pages 65-88, March.
    8. Mads Dagnis Jensen & Jesper Dahl Kelstrup, 2019. "House United, House Divided: Explaining the EU's Unity in the Brexit Negotiations," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(S1), pages 28-39, September.
    9. Brigid Laffan, 2019. "How the EU27 Came to Be," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(S1), pages 13-27, September.
    10. Javier Arregui, 2016. "Determinants of Bargaining Satisfaction Across Policy Domains in the European Union Council of Ministers," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(5), pages 1105-1122, September.
    11. Benjamin Martill & Uta Staiger, 2021. "Negotiating Brexit: The Cultural Sources of British Hard Bargaining," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(2), pages 261-277, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stefanie Walter, 2021. "EU‐27 Public Opinion on Brexit," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(3), pages 569-588, May.
    2. Leonard August Schuette, 2021. "Forging Unity: European Commission Leadership in the Brexit Negotiations," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(5), pages 1142-1159, September.
    3. Fabio Wasserfallen & Dirk Leuffen & Zdenek Kudrna & Hanno Degner, 2019. "Analysing European Union decision-making during the Eurozone crisis with new data," European Union Politics, , vol. 20(1), pages 3-23, March.
    4. Monika Brusenbauch Meislová, 2023. "In Quest for Discursive Legitimation of Ongoing Policy Processes: Constructing Brexit as a Success Story," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(3), pages 815-833, May.
    5. Garz, Marcel & Maaß, Sabrina, 2021. "Cartels in the European Union, antitrust action, and public attention," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 533-547.
    6. David Phinnemore, 2023. "The United Kingdom: Turning its Back on Influencing the EU?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(6), pages 1488-1511, November.
    7. Jeffry Frieden & Stefanie Walter, 2019. "Analyzing inter-state negotiations in the Eurozone crisis and beyond," European Union Politics, , vol. 20(1), pages 134-151, March.
    8. Ulrich Krotz & Lucas Schramm, 2021. "An Old Couple in a New Setting: Franco-German Leadership in the Post-Brexit EU," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(1), pages 48-58.
    9. Fabio Franchino & Camilla Mariotto, 2021. "Noncompliance risk, asymmetric power and the design of enforcement of the European economic governance," European Union Politics, , vol. 22(4), pages 591-610, December.
    10. repec:bla:glopol:v:8:y:2017:i:s5:p:102-112 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Christian Freudlsperger & Martin Weinrich, 2022. "Decentralized EU Policy Coordination in Crisis? The Case of Germany," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(5), pages 1356-1373, September.
    12. Angelou, Angelos, 2025. "Linking crises: inter-crisis learning and the European Commission’s approach to the National Recovery and Resilience Plans," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 123867, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    13. Joshua C Fjelstul, 2022. "Explaining public opinion on the enforcement of the Stability and Growth Pact during the European sovereign debt crisis," European Union Politics, , vol. 23(2), pages 192-211, June.
    14. Leonard Schuette & Hylke Dijkstra, 2023. "The show must go on: The EU's quest to sustain multilateral institutions since 2016," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(5), pages 1318-1336, September.
    15. Monika Brusenbauch Meislová & Julie Elizabeth Smith & Ed Turner, 2026. "Anatomy of a Stalemate: Making Sense of the EU–UK Youth Mobility Controversy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(2), pages 902-911, March.
    16. von Malmborg, Fredrik, 2022. "Theorising member state lobbying on European Union policy on energy efficiency," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    17. Daniel Finke & Stefanie Bailer, 2019. "Crisis bargaining in the European Union: Formal rules or market pressure?," European Union Politics, , vol. 20(1), pages 109-133, March.
    18. Enrico Borghetto & Lucia Quaglia & Igor Guardiancich, 2026. "Reform Agendas in National Recovery and Resilience Plans: Partisan Politics and Domestic Usages of Europe," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(1), pages 75-99, January.
    19. James P Cross & AustÄ— VaznonytÄ—, 2020. "Can we do what we say we will do? Issue salience, government effectiveness, and the legislative efficiency of Council Presidencies," European Union Politics, , vol. 21(4), pages 657-679, December.
    20. Bruch, Nils & Knodt, Michèle & Ringel, Marc, 2024. "Advocating harder soft governance for the European Green Deal. Stakeholder perspectives on the revision of the EU governance regulation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    21. Silvana Târlea & Stefanie Bailer & Hanno Degner & Lisa M Dellmuth & Dirk Leuffen & Magnus Lundgren & Jonas Tallberg & Fabio Wasserfallen, 2019. "Explaining governmental preferences on Economic and Monetary Union Reform," European Union Politics, , vol. 20(1), pages 24-44, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:63:y:2025:i:2:p:507-525. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0021-9886 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.