IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/poango/v9y2021i1p48-58.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Old Couple in a New Setting: Franco-German Leadership in the Post-Brexit EU

Author

Listed:
  • Ulrich Krotz

    (European University Institute, Italy)

  • Lucas Schramm

    (European University Institute, Italy)

Abstract

What are the implications of Brexit for the nature, role, and potential of Franco-German leadership in the EU? Brexit, we contend, is both an expression and a further cause of two broader underlying developments in the contemporary EU: First, a stronger and more prominent German part and position, and second, disintegrative tendencies in several EU policy fields and the EU polity as a whole. This, in turn, has major implications for Franco-German bilateralism and for Franco-German leadership in the EU. In light of a stronger Germany, a relatively weaker France, and significant centrifugal forces, the two largest EU member states must not only realign their bilateral relationship but must also act as a stabilizer in and for the EU. We show that during the EU’s recent crises, not least during the Brexit negotiations and the recovery from the Covid-19 pandemic, France and Germany did exercise joint leadership. We also show, however, that major discrepancies persist between the two countries in particular policy fields and with regard to longer-term European objectives. Brexit, with its numerous calamities and implications, thus once again moves Franco-German leadership—and its shortcomings—to center stage in Europe. When it comes to leadership in the EU, there remains no viable alternative to the Franco-German duo. Yet, in order to provide constructive leadership and successfully shape the EU, the two countries must bridge substantial differences and be ready to carry disproportionately high burdens.

Suggested Citation

  • Ulrich Krotz & Lucas Schramm, 2021. "An Old Couple in a New Setting: Franco-German Leadership in the Post-Brexit EU," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(1), pages 48-58.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v:9:y:2021:i:1:p:48-58
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/3645
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brigid Laffan, 2019. "How the EU27 Came to Be," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(S1), pages 13-27, September.
    2. Joachim Schild, 2010. "Mission Impossible? The Potential for Franco-German Leadership in the Enlarged EU," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48, pages 1367-1390, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Edoardo Bressanelli & Nicola Chelotti, 2021. "Assessing What Brexit Means for Europe: Implications for EU Institutions and Actors," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(1), pages 1-4.
    2. Ulrich Krotz & Lucas Schramm, 2022. "Embedded Bilateralism, Integration Theory, and European Crisis Politics: France, Germany, and the Birth of the EU Corona Recovery Fund," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(3), pages 526-544, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stefanie Walter, 2021. "EU‐27 Public Opinion on Brexit," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(3), pages 569-588, May.
    2. Sven Van Kerckhoven, 2021. "Post-Brexit Leadership in European Finance," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(1), pages 59-68.
    3. Hanno Degner & Dirk Leuffen, 2019. "Franco-German cooperation and the rescuing of the Eurozone," European Union Politics, , vol. 20(1), pages 89-108, March.
    4. Rachel Minto, 2020. "Sticky Networks in Times of Change: The Case of the European Women's Lobby and Brexit," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(6), pages 1587-1604, November.
    5. Leonard August Schuette, 2021. "Forging Unity: European Commission Leadership in the Brexit Negotiations," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(5), pages 1142-1159, September.
    6. Ulrich Krotz & Lucas Schramm, 2022. "Embedded Bilateralism, Integration Theory, and European Crisis Politics: France, Germany, and the Birth of the EU Corona Recovery Fund," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(3), pages 526-544, May.
    7. Simon Usherwood, 2021. "‘Our European Friends and Partners’? Negotiating the Trade and Cooperation Agreement," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(S1), pages 115-123, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v:9:y:2021:i:1:p:48-58. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.