IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jcmkts/v64y2026i1p75-99.html

Reform Agendas in National Recovery and Resilience Plans: Partisan Politics and Domestic Usages of Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Enrico Borghetto
  • Lucia Quaglia
  • Igor Guardiancich

Abstract

This article examines the agency of national executives in shaping the reform agendas within the National Recovery and Resilience Plans (NRRPs) under the EU's Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF). Through a comparative analysis of NRRPs drafting in Germany, France, Italy and Spain, and an in‐depth longitudinal study of Italy, we argue that the partisan profile of national executives, to a significant extent, accounts for which reforms were included in the respective national plans, while the domestic usage of Europe by national executives explains how they went about embedding those reforms in the NRRPs. In terms of research design, we first match the reform priorities outlined in the political manifestos of the governing parties and those included in the NRRPs. Second, through a systematic analysis of press coverage, we sketch out how national executives leveraged (or not) Europe domestically during the drafting of their respective plans. Our findings contribute to shed light on the interplay between domestic political dynamics and EU‐level requirements, demonstrating how governments navigated the tension between fulfilling their electoral mandates, building domestic support for their reform agendas and adhering to EU guidelines and constraints.

Suggested Citation

  • Enrico Borghetto & Lucia Quaglia & Igor Guardiancich, 2026. "Reform Agendas in National Recovery and Resilience Plans: Partisan Politics and Domestic Usages of Europe," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(1), pages 75-99, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:64:y:2026:i:1:p:75-99
    DOI: 10.1111/jcms.13738
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13738
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jcms.13738?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:64:y:2026:i:1:p:75-99. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0021-9886 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.