IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jcmkts/v55y2017i5p1127-1143.html

Why Implement without a Tangible Threat? The Effect of a Soft Instrument on National Migrant Integration Policies

Author

Listed:
  • Pierre Georges Van Wolleghem

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Pierre Georges Van Wolleghem, 2017. "Why Implement without a Tangible Threat? The Effect of a Soft Instrument on National Migrant Integration Policies," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(5), pages 1127-1143, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:55:y:2017:i:5:p:1127-1143
    DOI: 10.1111/jcms.12553
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/jcms.12553
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jcms.12553?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ospina, Raydonal & Ferrari, Silvia L.P., 2012. "A general class of zero-or-one inflated beta regression models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(6), pages 1609-1623.
    2. Sabine Saurugger, 2007. "Democratic ‘Misfit’? Conceptions of Civil Society Participation in France and the European Union," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 55(2), pages 384-404, June.
    3. Dai, Xinyuan, 2005. "Why Comply? The Domestic Constituency Mechanism," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 59(2), pages 363-398, April.
    4. Scharpf, Fritz W., 2003. "Problem-solving effectiveness and democratic accountability in the EU," MPIfG Working Paper 03/1, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    5. Haverland, Markus, 2000. "National Adaptation to European Integration: The Importance of Institutional Veto Points," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(1), pages 83-103, April.
    6. Thomson, Robert & Torenvlied, René & Arregui, Javier, 2007. "The Paradox of Compliance: Infringements and Delays in Transposing European Union Directives," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 37(4), pages 685-709, October.
    7. Treib, Oliver, . "Implementing and complying with EU governance outputs," Living Reviews in European Governance (LREG), Institute for European integration research (EIF).
    8. Sabine Saurugger, 2007. "Democratic 'Misfit'? Conceptions of Civil Society Participation in France and the European Union," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 55, pages 384-404, June.
    9. Browne, Eric C. & Franklin, Mark N., 1973. "Aspects of Coalition Payoffs in European Parliamentary Democracies," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 67(2), pages 453-469, June.
    10. Christoph Knill & Andrea Lenschow, 2005. "Compliance, Competition and Communication: Different Approaches of European Governance and their Impact on National Institutions," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(3), pages 583-606, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nicu Marcu & Marian Siminică & Graţiela Georgiana Noja & Mirela Cristea & Carmen Elena Dobrotă, 2018. "Migrants’ Integration on the European Labor Market: A Spatial Bootstrap, SEM and Network Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-20, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rosa Sanchez Salgado, 2014. "Rebalancing EU Interest Representation? Associative Democracy and EU Funding of Civil Society Organizations," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(2), pages 337-353, March.
    2. Nora Dörrenbächer & Ellen Mastenbroek, 2019. "Passing the buck? Analyzing the delegation of discretion after transposition of European Union law," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(1), pages 70-85, March.
    3. Michael Krug & Maria Rosaria Di Nucci & Lucas Schwarz & Irene Alonso & Isabel Azevedo & Massimo Bastiani & Anna Dyląg & Erik Laes & Arthur Hinsch & Gaidis Klāvs & Ivars Kudreņickis & Pouyan Maleki & G, 2023. "Implementing European Union Provisions and Enabling Frameworks for Renewable Energy Communities in Nine Countries: Progress, Delays, and Gaps," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-29, May.
    4. Megan Horst & Nathan McClintock & Adrien Baysse-Lainé & Ségolène Darly & Flaminia Paddeu & Coline Perrin & Kristin Reynolds & Christophe-Toussaint Soulard, 2021. "Translating land justice through comparison: a US–French dialogue and research agenda," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 38(4), pages 865-880, December.
    5. Christian B. Jensen, 2007. "Implementing Europe," European Union Politics, , vol. 8(4), pages 451-477, December.
    6. Becker, Marie, 2025. "Transposing EU-legislation on critical infrastructure protection legal implementation performance in the Baltic Sea region," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    7. Bieber, Tonia, 2011. "Convergence through communication and competition? The internationalization of secondary and higher education policies in Switzerland," TranState Working Papers 147, University of Bremen, Collaborative Research Center 597: Transformations of the State.
    8. Teräväinen, Tuula & Lehtonen, Markku & Martiskainen, Mari, 2011. "Climate change, energy security, and risk--debating nuclear new build in Finland, France and the UK," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 3434-3442, June.
    9. Brooke Luetgert & Tanja Dannwolf, 2009. "Mixing Methods," European Union Politics, , vol. 10(3), pages 307-334, September.
    10. Stijn van Voorst & Ellen Mastenbroek, 2017. "Enforcement tool or strategic instrument? The initiation of ex-post legislative evaluations by the European Commission," European Union Politics, , vol. 18(4), pages 640-657, December.
    11. Enrico Bergamini & Georg Zachmann, 2020. "Exploring EU’s Regional Potential in Low-Carbon Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-28, December.
    12. Agni Kalfagianni & Oran R. Young, 2022. "The politics of multilateral environmental agreements lessons from 20 years of INEA," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 245-262, June.
    13. Guillermo Martínez-Flórez & Artur J. Lemonte & Germán Moreno-Arenas & Roger Tovar-Falón, 2022. "The Bivariate Unit-Sinh-Normal Distribution and Its Related Regression Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(17), pages 1-26, August.
    14. Diesenreiter, Carina & Österle, August, 2021. "Patients as EU citizens? The implementation and corporatist stakeholders’ perceptions of the EU cross-border health care directive in Austria," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(11), pages 1498-1505.
    15. Christopher Pallas & Johannes Urpelainen, 2012. "NGO monitoring and the legitimacy of international cooperation: A strategic analysis," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-32, March.
    16. Salvatore D. Tomarchio & Antonio Punzo, 2019. "Modelling the loss given default distribution via a family of zero‐and‐one inflated mixture models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 182(4), pages 1247-1266, October.
    17. Jasper Krommendijk, 2015. "The domestic effectiveness of international human rights monitoring in established democracies. The case of the UN human rights treaty bodies," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 10(4), pages 489-512, December.
    18. Mehmet Ugur, 2010. "Open‐Ended Membership Prospect and Commitment Credibility: Explaining the Deadlock in EU–Turkey Accession Negotiations," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(4), pages 967-991, September.
    19. Carlos Rojas & Bernardo Riffo & Ernesto Guerra, 2023. "Word Retrieval After the 80s: Evidence From Specific and Multiple Words Naming Tasks," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(2), pages 21582440231, May.
    20. Gourieroux, Christian & Lu, Yang, 2019. "Least impulse response estimator for stress test exercises," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 62-77.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:55:y:2017:i:5:p:1127-1143. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0021-9886 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.