IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jageco/v46y1995i2p241-251.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Bias Between Sampling Frames For Farm Surveys

Author

Listed:
  • Harriet Emerson
  • Robert MacFarlane

Abstract

This paper proposes a methodology for quantifying the relative bias inherent in various farm sampling frames. It can be applied to any area or region for which a significant sample of farms is required. A random survey examined the relative representativeness of selected farm characteristics by National Farmers' Union of Scotland (NFUS) and Scottish Landowners' Federation (SLF) membership lists, the British Telecom Yellow Pages farm business listings, and the Scottish Office Agriculture and Fisheries Department June census returns on farm holdings. It is suggested that a methodology to assess comparative bias should be employed prior to any extensive work requiring the use of a sampling frame for farm holdings or businesses, to ensure that the most appropriate framework is chosen and a greater understanding of research findings achieved.

Suggested Citation

  • Harriet Emerson & Robert MacFarlane, 1995. "Comparative Bias Between Sampling Frames For Farm Surveys," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(2), pages 241-251, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jageco:v:46:y:1995:i:2:p:241-251
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-9552.1995.tb00770.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.1995.tb00770.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1477-9552.1995.tb00770.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hammond, R. & McCullagh, Patrick S., 1978. "Quantitative Techniques in Geography: An Introduction," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, edition 2, number 9780198740674.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lobley, Matt & Butler, Allan, 2010. "The impact of CAP reform on farmers' plans for the future: Some evidence from South West England," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 341-348, August.
    2. Himelein, Kristen & Eckman, Stephanie & Murray, Siobhan, 2013. "The use of random geographic cluster sampling to survey pastoralists," Policy Research Working Paper Series 6589, The World Bank.
    3. Himelein Kristen & Eckman Stephanie & Murray Siobhan, 2014. "Sampling Nomads: A New Technique for Remote, Hard-to-Reach, and Mobile Populations," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 30(2), pages 1-23, June.
    4. Butler, Allan J. & Winter, Michael, 2008. "Agricultural Tenure in England and Wales 2007," Research Reports 47560, University of Exeter, Centre for Rural Policy Research.
    5. L. Tsourgiannis & M. Warren & A. Karasavvoglou & J. Eddison, 2012. "Marketing Strategies for the Primary Sector: An Empirical Study," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 147-178.
    6. Tate, Graham & Mbzibain, Aurelian, 2011. "The future contribution of bioenergy enterprises to rural business viability in the United Kingdom," International Journal of Agricultural Management, Institute of Agricultural Management, vol. 1(2), pages 1-15.
    7. Islam, Moinul & Kotani, Koji & Managi, Shunsuke, 2016. "Climate perception and flood mitigation cooperation: A Bangladesh case study," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 117-133.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lina Eklund & Jonathan Seaquist, 2015. "Meteorological, agricultural and socioeconomic drought in the Duhok Governorate, Iraqi Kurdistan," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 76(1), pages 421-441, March.
    2. Gonzalez, X.P. & Marey, M.F. & Alvarez, C.J., 2007. "Evaluation of productive rural land patterns with joint regard to the size, shape and dispersion of plots," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 92(1-3), pages 52-62, January.
    3. Gonzalez, X. P. & Alvarez, C. J. & Crecente, R., 2004. "Evaluation of land distributions with joint regard to plot size and shape," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 82(1), pages 31-43, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jageco:v:46:y:1995:i:2:p:241-251. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0021-857X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.