IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/inecol/v28y2024i6p1684-1698.html

Sustainability of bio‐based polyethylene: The influence of biomass sourcing and end‐of‐life

Author

Listed:
  • Linda Ritzen
  • Benjamin Sprecher
  • Conny Bakker
  • Ruud Balkenende

Abstract

Bio‐based polymers may present a sustainable, circular way to reduce the environmental impact of plastics because they are produced from biomass that absorbs CO2 during its growth. However, sourcing (type of biomass used and cultivation location), production, and end‐of‐life affect the environmental impact of bio‐based plastics. We assessed the effect of sourcing and end‐of‐life options on the environmental impact of bio‐based high‐density polyethylene (bio‐HDPE) in 31 sourcing scenarios and five end‐of‐life options. Our study found that careful consideration of biomass sourcing (biomass type and production location) and end‐of‐life is needed to optimize the environmental impact of bio‐based plastics. If these aspects are not considered, the environmental impact of bio‐HDPE may exceed that of its petrochemical‐based counterpart. The direct availability of fermentable sugars indicated a lower environmental impact. The production location affected the resources needed for biomass cultivation and the environmental impact of processing due to the energy mix. Recently published guidelines do not allow biogenic carbon to be accounted for during the production stage, but only upon the incineration of the plastic. Our results show that this way of attributing biogenic carbon results in an apparent disadvantage for bio‐based plastics compared to petrochemical‐based plastics. Furthermore, it disadvantaged mechanical recycling of bio‐based plastics compared to incineration, a result out of line with circular economy principles.

Suggested Citation

  • Linda Ritzen & Benjamin Sprecher & Conny Bakker & Ruud Balkenende, 2024. "Sustainability of bio‐based polyethylene: The influence of biomass sourcing and end‐of‐life," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 28(6), pages 1684-1698, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:28:y:2024:i:6:p:1684-1698
    DOI: 10.1111/jiec.13555
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13555
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jiec.13555?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lars Wietschel & Lukas Messmann & Andrea Thorenz & Axel Tuma, 2021. "Environmental benefits of large‐scale second‐generation bioethanol production in the EU: An integrated supply chain network optimization and life cycle assessment approach," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(3), pages 677-692, June.
    2. Merrild, Hanna & Damgaard, Anders & Christensen, Thomas H., 2008. "Life cycle assessment of waste paper management: The importance of technology data and system boundaries in assessing recycling and incineration," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 52(12), pages 1391-1398.
    3. Christin Liptow & Anne‐Marie Tillman, 2012. "A Comparative Life Cycle Assessment Study of Polyethylene Based on Sugarcane and Crude Oil," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 16(3), pages 420-435, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Allacker, K. & Mathieux, F. & Manfredi, S. & Pelletier, N. & De Camillis, C. & Ardente, F. & Pant, R., 2014. "Allocation solutions for secondary material production and end of life recovery: Proposals for product policy initiatives," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 1-12.
    2. Murphy, Sinnott & Pincetl, Stephanie, 2013. "Zero waste in Los Angeles: Is the emperor wearing any clothes?," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 40-51.
    3. Clauser, Nicolas & Scown, Corinne D. & Pett-Ridge, Jennifer & Sagues, William Joe, 2025. "A techno-economic assessment of carbon dioxide removal pathways via biochemical conversion of lignocellulose to biofuels and bioplastics," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    4. Yang, F. & Meerman, J.C. & Faaij, A.P.C., 2021. "Carbon capture and biomass in industry: A techno-economic analysis and comparison of negative emission options," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    5. Turner, David A. & Williams, Ian D. & Kemp, Simon, 2015. "Greenhouse gas emission factors for recycling of source-segregated waste materials," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 105(PA), pages 186-197.
    6. Lukas Messmann & Lars Wietschel & Andrea Thorenz & Axel Tuma, 2023. "Assessing the social dimension in strategic network optimization for a sustainable development: The case of bioethanol production in the EU," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(3), pages 760-776, June.
    7. Minoglou, Minas & Komilis, Dimitrios, 2013. "Optimizing the treatment and disposal of municipal solid wastes using mathematical programming—A case study in a Greek region," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 46-57.
    8. Tiejun Dai, 2024. "Assessing the Ecological Cost of Material Flow in China’s Waste Paper Recycling System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-18, February.
    9. Furszyfer Del Rio, Dylan D. & Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Griffiths, Steve & Bazilian, Morgan & Kim, Jinsoo & Foley, Aoife M. & Rooney, David, 2022. "Decarbonizing the pulp and paper industry: A critical and systematic review of sociotechnical developments and policy options," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    10. Andrade Díaz, Christhel & Clivot, Hugues & Albers, Ariane & Zamora-Ledezma, Ezequiel & Hamelin, Lorie, 2023. "The crop residue conundrum: Maintaining long-term soil organic carbon stocks while reinforcing the bioeconomy, compatible endeavors?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 329(C).
    11. Margallo, M. & Dominguez-Ramos, A. & Aldaco, R. & Bala, A. & Fullana, P. & Irabien, A., 2014. "Environmental sustainability assessment in the process industry: A case study of waste-to-energy plants in Spain," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 144-155.
    12. Lisa Duval & Guillaume Majeau‐Bettez & François Saunier & François Maréchal & Manuele Margni, 2024. "Optimization of the end‐of‐life tire repartition within the European treatment system to minimize its environmental impacts," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 28(3), pages 512-526, June.
    13. Alvarenga, Rodrigo A.F. & Dewulf, Jo, 2013. "Plastic vs. fuel: Which use of the Brazilian ethanol can bring more environmental gains?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 49-52.
    14. Manfredi, Simone & Goralczyk, Malgorzata, 2013. "Life cycle indicators for monitoring the environmental performance of European waste management," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 8-16.
    15. Klöckner, Christian Andreas & Oppedal, Inger Olin, 2011. "General vs. domain specific recycling behaviour—Applying a multilevel comprehensive action determination model to recycling in Norwegian student homes," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 55(4), pages 463-471.
    16. Roel J. K. Helmes & Pietro Goglio & Silvia Salomoni & Daan S. van Es & Iris Vural Gursel & Lusine Aramyan, 2022. "Environmental Impacts of End-of-Life Options of Biobased and Fossil-Based Polyethylene Terephthalate and High-Density Polyethylene Packaging," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-16, September.
    17. Ferrão, Paulo & Ribeiro, Paulo & Rodrigues, João & Marques, Alexandra & Preto, Miguel & Amaral, Miguel & Domingos, Tiago & Lopes, Ana & Costa, e Inês, 2014. "Environmental, economic and social costs and benefits of a packaging waste management system: A Portuguese case study," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 67-78.
    18. Koller, Martin & Sandholzer, Daniel & Salerno, Anna & Braunegg, Gerhart & Narodoslawsky, Michael, 2013. "Biopolymer from industrial residues: Life cycle assessment of poly(hydroxyalkanoates) from whey," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 64-71.
    19. Lausselet, Carine & Cherubini, Francesco & Oreggioni, Gabriel David & del Alamo Serrano, Gonzalo & Becidan, Michael & Hu, Xiangping & Rørstad, Per Kr. & Strømman, Anders Hammer, 2017. "Norwegian Waste-to-Energy: Climate change, circular economy and carbon capture and storage," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 50-61.
    20. Jabbarzadeh, Armin & Shamsi, Meisam, 2025. "Designing a resilient and sustainable multi-feedstock bioethanol supply chain: Integration of mathematical modeling and machine learning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 377(PB).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:28:y:2024:i:6:p:1684-1698. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1088-1980 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.