IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/inecol/v27y2023i2p548-561.html

Client‐side energy and GHGs assessment of advertising and tracking in the news websites

Author

Listed:
  • Fabio Pesari
  • Giovanni Lagioia
  • Annarita Paiano

Abstract

Electronic devices consume energy both in the production and the use phase. Furthermore, the “hidden” impacts linked to their use are not frequently assessed and they depend on the behavior of the users, besides the servers and complex web networks. It must be underlined that many websites employ ads and trackers as part of their monetization strategy and, in order for online ads and trackers to work, they add an additional code to be executed on the users’ machines, which in turn requires more processing power. Considering that the Internet had an estimated 4.9 billion users in 2021, the global energy and carbon impacts of online ads and trackers might be significant. To investigate this phenomenon, we designed a novel automated framework for bottom‐up estimation of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions attributable to software using exclusively free and open source software. Our process involved the building of a random sample of global news websites which we visited with and without an ad‐blocker, each time collecting power usage in identical conditions. The gathered data were put into an ordinary least squares (OLS)‐based linear regression model, which showed that ads and trackers on news websites require on average an additional 6.13 W of power on personal computers. This result was then tuned to global environmental and technological parameters to estimate that in 2019, on the client side, ads and trackers on the news websites consumed 0.61 TWh of electrical energy, emitted 0.29 MtCO2eq of GHG, and cost all Internet users approximately 140 million USD (purchasing power parity) of electrical energy. This article met the requirements for a gold‐gold JIE data openness badge described at http://jie.click/badges.

Suggested Citation

  • Fabio Pesari & Giovanni Lagioia & Annarita Paiano, 2023. "Client‐side energy and GHGs assessment of advertising and tracking in the news websites," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(2), pages 548-561, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:27:y:2023:i:2:p:548-561
    DOI: 10.1111/jiec.13376
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13376
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jiec.13376?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul Teehan & Milind Kandlikar, 2012. "Sources of Variation in Life Cycle Assessments of Desktop Computers," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 16(s1), pages 182-194, April.
    2. Paiano, Annarita & Lagioia, Giovanni & Cataldo, Andrea, 2013. "A critical analysis of the sustainability of mobile phone use," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 162-171.
    3. Darrel C. Ince & Leslie Hatton & John Graham-Cumming, 2012. "The case for open computer programs," Nature, Nature, vol. 482(7386), pages 485-488, February.
    4. Andrew Hook & Victor Court & Benjamin K Sovacool & Steven Sorrell, 2020. "A Systematic Review of the Energy and Climate Impacts of Teleworking," Working Papers hal-03192905, HAL.
    5. Mauro Cordella & Felice Alfieri & Javier Sanfelix, 2021. "Reducing the carbon footprint of ICT products through material efficiency strategies: A life cycle analysis of smartphones," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(2), pages 448-464, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Johan Colding & Stephan Barthel & Robert Ljung & Felix Eriksson & Stefan Sjöberg, 2022. "Urban Commons and Collective Action to Address Climate Change," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(1), pages 103-114.
    2. Diana Blagu & Denisa Szabo & Diana Dragomir & Călin Neamțu & Daniela Popescu, 2022. "Offering Carbon Smart Options through Product Development to Meet Customer Expectations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-21, August.
    3. Michel Noussan & Matteo Jarre, 2021. "Assessing Commuting Energy and Emissions Savings through Remote Working and Carpooling: Lessons from an Italian Region," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, November.
    4. Kevin Nabor Paredes-Canencio & Ana Lasso & Rosaura Castrillon & Juan R. Vidal-Medina & Enrique C. Quispe, 2024. "Carbon footprint of higher education institutions," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(12), pages 30239-30272, December.
    5. Milovantseva, Natalia & Fitzpatrick, Colin, 2015. "Barriers to electronics reuse of transboundary e-waste shipment regulations: An evaluation based on industry experiences," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 170-177.
    6. Dario Alessandro de Pinto & Donato Milella & Daniele Macali & Riccardo Basile & Carmen Lavinia & Giovanni Murano & Marco Rao & Roberta Roberto & Andrea Tortora & Alessandro Zini, 2026. "The environmental impact of remote working: insights from a survey conducted in Banca d'Italia," Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers) 999, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    7. repec:plo:pone00:0061217 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Tian, Guang & Jenkins, Bryce & Danton, Bob, 2025. "Quantifying the influences of telecommuting on household total trips and VMT generation," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    9. DeCarolis, Joseph F. & Hunter, Kevin & Sreepathi, Sarat, 2012. "The case for repeatable analysis with energy economy optimization models," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 1845-1853.
    10. Raihanian Mashhadi, Ardeshir & Behdad, Sara, 2018. "Discriminant effects of consumer electronics use-phase attributes on household energy prediction," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 346-355.
    11. Fouquet, Roger & Hippe, Ralph, 2022. "Twin transitions of decarbonisation and digitalisation: a historical perspective on energy and information in European economies," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 115544, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Tsiliyannis, Christos Aristeides, 2015. "Sustainability by cyclic manufacturing: Assessment of resource preservation under uncertain growth and returns," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 155-170.
    13. Handy, Susan, 2025. "Telecommuting," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt94x127n7, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    14. Ivan Faiella & Luciano Lavecchia, 2021. "Households' energy demand and the effects of carbon pricing in Italy," Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers) 614, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    15. Burleyson, Casey D. & Rahman, Aowabin & Rice, Jennie S. & Smith, Amanda D. & Voisin, Nathalie, 2021. "Multiscale effects masked the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on electricity demand in the United States," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    16. Anne Aguiléra & Eléonore Pigalle, 2021. "The Future and Sustainability of Carpooling Practices. An Identification of Research Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-16, October.
    17. Viktorija Bobinaite & Inga Konstantinaviciute & Arvydas Galinis & Mária Bartek-Lesi & Viktor Rácz & Bettina Dézsi, 2022. "Energy Sufficiency in the Household Sector of Lithuania and Hungary: The Case of Heated Floor Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-19, December.
    18. Paweł Ziemba & Mateusz Piwowarski & Kesra Nermend, 2023. "Remote Work in Post-Pandemic Reality—Multi-Criteria Evaluation of Teleconferencing Software," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-20, June.
    19. Li, Kai & Yan, Erjia, 2018. "Co-mention network of R packages: Scientific impact and clustering structure," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 87-100.
    20. Máté János Lőrincz & José Luis Ramírez-Mendiola & Jacopo Torriti, 2021. "Impact of Time-Use Behaviour on Residential Energy Consumption in the United Kingdom," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-32, October.
    21. Josh Lepawsky & Kathia Cáceres & Marco Gusukuma & Ramzy Kahhat, 2023. "Carbon and water conservation value of independent, place‐based repair in Lima, Peru," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(3), pages 896-907, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:27:y:2023:i:2:p:548-561. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1088-1980 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.